McInally Samantha, Claiborne Daniel T, El-Badry Elina, Xu Rui, Qin Qianhong, Ende Zachary, Deymier Martin J, Rhodes Jake W, Gilmour Jill, Kilembe William, Karita Etienne, Allen Susan A, Yue Ling, Hunter Eric
Emory Vaccine Center at Emory National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Front Microbiol. 2025 Aug 11;16:1649731. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1649731. eCollection 2025.
HIV-1 subtype A and subtype C infections have different rates of clinical disease progression, with subtype C infected individuals in the IAVI Protocol C multisite acute infection cohort having a 60% faster CD4 loss compared to subtype A.
In order to investigate whether differences were due to the phenotype of the transmitted founder virus (TFV), or inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, known to drive pathogenesis, we PCR amplified, sequenced and constructed infectious molecular HIV-1 clones from the plasma of 30 acutely infected individuals in Rwanda and Zambia. We next compared the inflammatory plasma cytokine/chemokine profiles of individuals pre- and post-the estimated date of infection of 20 Rwandan individuals infected with subtype A and 34 Zambians infected with subtype C HIV-1.
A comparison of the replicative capacity of 14 subtype A and 16 subtype C TFV showed that they had similar replicative capacity (RC) scores. Nevertheless, high TFV RC scores were linked to more rapid CD4 T cell loss, and higher inflammatory cytokine levels irrespective of subtype. Multivariable analyses showed that individuals infected with subtype C exhibited a significant increase in the levels of eleven pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines after infection, while, in subtype A infections only six cytokines were significantly elevated postinfection. Despite these differences, at 3-months post infection, similar overall biomarker profiles were observed in individuals infected with subtype A or subtype C viruses, primarily due to higher pre-infection baseline biomarker levels in Rwanda. In the combined cohort, we found a highly significant association between faster CD4 T cell decline and higher levels of ITAC (CXCL11), which in turn was linked to higher TFV RC.
Overall, the data presented here argue against TFV RC as the basis for different pathogenic outcomes in the subtypes A and C. Moreover, levels of inflammatory cytokines that might drive disease progression were similar during acute infection indicating that additional studies are required to understand the mechanism underlying differences in disease progression between the two subtypes. For both subtypes, high levels of ITAC during acute HIV-1 infection are linked to rapid disease progression.
HIV-1 A亚型和C亚型感染具有不同的临床疾病进展速率,在国际艾滋病疫苗倡议组织(IAVI)C方案多中心急性感染队列中,C亚型感染个体的CD4细胞损失速度比A亚型快60%。
为了研究差异是否归因于传播奠基病毒(TFV)的表型,或已知驱动发病机制的炎性细胞因子和趋化因子,我们从卢旺达和赞比亚30名急性感染个体的血浆中进行PCR扩增、测序并构建了具有传染性的分子HIV-1克隆。接下来,我们比较了20名感染A亚型的卢旺达个体和34名感染C亚型HIV-1的赞比亚个体在估计感染日期前后的炎性血浆细胞因子/趋化因子谱。
对14个A亚型和16个C亚型TFV的复制能力进行比较,结果显示它们具有相似的复制能力(RC)评分。然而,无论亚型如何,高TFV RC评分都与更快的CD4 T细胞损失以及更高的炎性细胞因子水平相关。多变量分析表明,感染C亚型的个体在感染后11种促炎细胞因子/趋化因子的水平显著升高,而在A亚型感染中,只有6种细胞因子在感染后显著升高。尽管存在这些差异,但在感染后3个月时,感染A亚型或C亚型病毒的个体观察到相似的总体生物标志物谱,这主要是由于卢旺达个体感染前的基线生物标志物水平较高。在合并队列中,我们发现CD4 T细胞下降更快与较高水平的ITAC(CXCL11)之间存在高度显著的关联,而ITAC又与较高的TFV RC相关。
总体而言,此处呈现的数据表明TFV RC并非A亚型和C亚型不同致病结果的基础。此外,在急性感染期间,可能驱动疾病进展的炎性细胞因子水平相似,这表明需要进一步研究以了解这两种亚型疾病进展差异的潜在机制。对于这两种亚型,急性HIV-1感染期间高水平ITAC均与疾病快速进展相关。