• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
["Global forgetting" and extreme communicative events].["全球遗忘"与极端交流事件]
Cad Saude Publica. 2025 Aug 22;41(8):e00048825. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPT048825. eCollection 2025.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
4
Memory in the digital age.数字时代的记忆。
Open Res Eur. 2024 Jan 12;3:123. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.16228.2. eCollection 2023.
5
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
7
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Fabricating mice and dementia: opening up relations in multi-species research制造小鼠与痴呆症:开启多物种研究中的关联
9
Reducing health inequalities through general practice: a realist review and action framework.通过全科医疗减少健康不平等:一个现实主义综述和行动框架。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Mar;12(7):1-104. doi: 10.3310/YTWW7032.
10
Autistic People's Experience of Empathy and the Autistic Empathy Deficit Narrative.自闭症患者的共情体验与自闭症共情缺陷叙事
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):321-330. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0001. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Chambers that echo hate, bubbles that distill fear: the constitution of Self and intolerance as roots of disinformation.
Cien Saude Colet. 2025 Apr;30(4):e10492023. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232025304.10492023. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
2
Fake news and the seven sins of capital: a metaphorical analysis of vices in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.假新闻与资本的七宗罪:新冠疫情背景下的罪恶隐喻分析。
Cad Saude Publica. 2022 May 30;38(5):e00195421. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPT195421. eCollection 2022.
3
Gossip drives vicarious learning and facilitates social connection.八卦促进替代性学习,并促进社会联系。
Curr Biol. 2021 Jun 21;31(12):2539-2549.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.03.090. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
4
COVID-19, fake news, and the sleep of communicative reason producing monsters: the narrative of risks and the risks of narratives.COVID-19、假新闻和沟通理性的睡眠产生的怪物:风险叙事和叙事风险。
Cad Saude Publica. 2020;36(7):e00101920. doi: 10.1590/0102-311x00101920. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
5
The "online brain": how the Internet may be changing our cognition.“在线大脑”:互联网如何改变我们的认知。
World Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;18(2):119-129. doi: 10.1002/wps.20617.
6
The spread of low-credibility content by social bots.社交机器人传播低可信度内容。
Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 20;9(1):4787. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06930-7.
7
Weaponized Health Communication: Twitter Bots and Russian Trolls Amplify the Vaccine Debate.武器化的健康传播:推特机器人和俄罗斯水军放大疫苗辩论。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Oct;108(10):1378-1384. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304567. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
8
The spread of true and false news online.网络上真实和虚假新闻的传播。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1146-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559.
9
Toward a Metacognitive Account of Cognitive Offloading.迈向认知卸载的元认知解释。
Cogn Sci. 2016 Jul;40(5):1080-127. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12273. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
10
The media-driven risk society, the anti-vaccination movement and risk of autismo.媒体驱动的风险社会、反疫苗运动与自闭症风险
Cien Saude Colet. 2015 Feb;20(2):607-16. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232015202.10172014.

["全球遗忘"与极端交流事件]

["Global forgetting" and extreme communicative events].

作者信息

Vasconcellos-Silva Paulo Roberto, Castiel Luís David

机构信息

Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

出版信息

Cad Saude Publica. 2025 Aug 22;41(8):e00048825. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPT048825. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1590/0102-311XPT048825
PMID:40862443
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12373309/
Abstract

The present essay describes the scientific evidence on the decay of memory and focus caused due to overstimulation by digital media - herein dubbed "global forgetting". The argument put forth is that this situation is not limited to individual psychoneurological aspects, but rather to contemporary sociocultural processes comprising and fed by convergent technical, political, and economic vectors. This paper addresses the ethicality of overstimulation through the use of powerful technical devices of communicative curation, which result in the erasure of references that constitute collective identity and facilitate the acceptance of disinformation. We conceive these dynamics of erasure and the destruction of references as a positive sociotechnical process - and not merely a casual consequence. We use the emblematic case of the "people's radio" in the rise of Nazism, showing how extreme communicative events operate through the opposition of anti-versions (historical/scientific denialism) underpinned by disinformation that incites hatred (conspiracy theories) and simplifies complex scenarios in the construction of post-truths. The ethicality of contemporary digital technologies is questioned, which simultaneously cultivate the emptying of individual and collective memory through "global forgetting" with the purpose of rewriting the past and mitigating the cognitive dissonance resulting from contradictions with facts. We thus reject the notion of fortuitous forgetting as a mere gap resulting from unlinked casual psychotechnical phenomena. In summary, we point to the interconnections among "global forgetting", denialism, and post-truths, which are interdependent in terms of causalities, purposes, and dynamics.

摘要

本文描述了有关数字媒体过度刺激导致记忆衰退和注意力分散的科学证据——在此称为“全球遗忘”。提出的观点是,这种情况不仅限于个体心理神经学方面,还涉及当代社会文化进程,这些进程由融合的技术、政治和经济因素构成并受其推动。本文探讨了通过使用强大的传播策划技术设备进行过度刺激的伦理问题,这些设备导致构成集体身份的参考资料被抹去,并助长了虚假信息的接受。我们将这种抹去和参考资料破坏的动态视为一个积极的社会技术过程——而不仅仅是一个偶然的后果。我们以纳粹主义兴起时期“人民广播电台”这一标志性案例为例,展示极端传播事件如何通过虚假信息支持的反版本(历史/科学否认主义)的对立运作,这些虚假信息煽动仇恨(阴谋论)并在构建后真相时简化复杂场景。当代数字技术的伦理受到质疑,它们同时通过“全球遗忘”导致个体和集体记忆的空洞化,目的是重写过去并减轻与事实矛盾所产生的认知失调。因此,我们拒绝将偶然遗忘仅仅视为不相关的偶然心理技术现象所导致的空白这一观念。总之,我们指出“全球遗忘”、否认主义和后真相之间的相互联系,它们在因果关系、目的和动态方面相互依存。