Kirilova Janet, Iliev Georgi Veselinov, Yantcheva Sevda, Deliverska Elitsa, Petrova Viktoria
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Department of Prosthetic Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria.
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Aug 12;16(8):289. doi: 10.3390/jfb16080289.
This study assessed and compared the shear bond strength of self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements for indirect aesthetic restorations to dentin. Four different materials, lithium disilicate ceramics, zirconia ceramics, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) composites, and hybrid materials, were used for indirect restorations cemented to dentin. The null hypothesis was that there would be no differences in shear bond strength between the investigated materials. Eighty extracted human molars were used. Eighty dentin specimens with a flat surface were prepared and randomly distributed in groups of 10 (n = 10). From each material (Cerasmart 270, Initial LiSi Blok, Katana ZR Noritake, and Crowntec Next Dent), 20 blocks were made and cemented to the dentin samples. Half of the blocks from each material were cemented to dentin using self-etching resin cement (Panavia V5), and the other half using self-adhesive resin cement (i-CEM). After the specimens were prepared, a laboratory test was conducted to evaluate the shear bond strength. The fracture type was determined using a light microscope, and SEM confirmed the results. The results were statistically analysed. All materials cemented with self-etching cements (Panavia V5) showed statistically higher shear strength values than those cemented with self-adhesive resin cement (i-CEM). In the specimen groups where self-adhesive cement (i-CEM) was used, Cerasmart 270 bonded statistically better. A statistical difference was found between all groups of materials cemented with self-etching cement. The Initial LiSi Block showed the strongest bond, followed by Katana Zr Noritake, Crowntec NextDent, and Cerasmart 270. Adhesion fracture to dentin was observed for all groups cemented with i-CEM. This study highlights the superior performance of self-etching cements in terms of shear bond strength. 10-Methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP), a functional monomer, was found to enhance adhesion strength significantly. However, using self-adhesive cements was associated with a weaker bond to dentin, highlighting the importance of the right cementing agent in restorative dentistry.
本研究评估并比较了用于间接美学修复体与牙本质粘结的自酸蚀树脂水门汀和自粘结树脂水门汀的剪切粘结强度。四种不同材料,即二硅酸锂陶瓷、氧化锆陶瓷、聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)复合材料和混合材料,被用于粘结到牙本质上的间接修复体。无效假设是所研究材料之间的剪切粘结强度不存在差异。使用了80颗拔除的人类磨牙。制备了80个表面平整的牙本质标本,并随机分成每组10个(n = 10)。从每种材料(Cerasmart 270、Initial LiSi Blok、Katana ZR Noritake和Crowntec Next Dent)制作20个块体,并粘结到牙本质样本上。每种材料的一半块体使用自酸蚀树脂水门汀(Panavia V5)粘结到牙本质上,另一半使用自粘结树脂水门汀(i-CEM)。在制备标本后,进行了实验室测试以评估剪切粘结强度。使用光学显微镜确定断裂类型,扫描电子显微镜(SEM)证实了结果。对结果进行了统计学分析。所有用自酸蚀水门汀(Panavia V5)粘结的材料显示出的剪切强度值在统计学上高于用自粘结树脂水门汀(i-CEM)粘结的材料。在使用自粘结水门汀(i-CEM)的标本组中,Cerasmart 270的粘结在统计学上更好。在用自酸蚀水门汀粘结的所有材料组之间发现了统计学差异。Initial LiSi Block显示出最强的粘结,其次是Katana Zr Noritake、Crowntec NextDent和Cerasmart 270。在用i-CEM粘结的所有组中均观察到与牙本质的粘结断裂。本研究强调了自酸蚀水门汀在剪切粘结强度方面的优越性能。发现功能性单体10-甲基丙烯酰氧基癸基磷酸二氢酯(10-MDP)可显著提高粘结强度。然而,使用自粘结水门汀与牙本质的粘结较弱,突出了合适的粘结剂在修复牙科中的重要性。