Dovek Laura, Ahmadi Mahboubeh, Marrero Krista, Zagha Edward, Santhakumar Vijayalakshmi
Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program,University of California Riverside, Riverside, United States.
Department of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, United States.
Elife. 2025 Aug 27;13:RP101428. doi: 10.7554/eLife.101428.
The dentate gyrus is critical for spatial memory formation and shows task-related activation of cellular ensembles considered as memory engrams. Semilunar granule cells (SGCs), a sparse dentate projection neuron subtype, were reported to be enriched among behaviorally activated neurons. By examining SGCs and granule cells (GCs) labeled during contextual memory formation in TRAP2 mice, we empirically tested competing hypotheses for GC and SGC recruitment into memory ensembles. Consistent with more excitable neurons being recruited into memory ensembles, SGCs showed greater sustained firing than GCs. Additionally, labeled SGCs showed less adapting firing than unlabeled SGCs. The lack of glutamatergic connections between behaviorally labeled SGCs and GCs in our recordings is inconsistent with SGC-driven local circuit feedforward excitation underlying ensemble recruitment. Moreover, there was little evidence for individual SGCs or labeled neuronal ensembles supporting lateral inhibition of unlabeled neurons. Instead, labeled GCs and SGCs received more spontaneous excitatory synaptic inputs than their unlabeled counterparts. Labeled neuronal pairs received more temporally correlated spontaneous excitatory synaptic inputs than labeled-unlabeled neuronal pairs. These findings challenge the proposal that SGCs drive dentate GC ensemble refinement, while supporting a role for intrinsic excitability and correlated inputs in preferential SGC recruitment to contextual memory engrams.
齿状回对于空间记忆的形成至关重要,并显示出与任务相关的细胞集合的激活,这些细胞集合被视为记忆印迹。半月形颗粒细胞(SGCs)是一种稀疏的齿状投射神经元亚型,据报道在行为激活的神经元中富集。通过检查在TRAP2小鼠的情境记忆形成过程中标记的SGCs和颗粒细胞(GCs),我们实证检验了关于GCs和SGCs被招募到记忆集合中的相互竞争的假设。与更多易兴奋的神经元被招募到记忆集合中一致,SGCs比GCs表现出更大的持续放电。此外,标记的SGCs比未标记的SGCs表现出更少的适应性放电。我们记录中行为标记的SGCs和GCs之间缺乏谷氨酸能连接,这与SGC驱动的局部回路前馈兴奋作为集合招募的基础不一致。此外,几乎没有证据表明单个SGCs或标记的神经元集合支持对未标记神经元的侧向抑制。相反,标记的GCs和SGCs比未标记的对应物接受更多的自发兴奋性突触输入。标记的神经元对比标记 - 未标记的神经元对接受更多时间相关的自发兴奋性突触输入。这些发现挑战了SGCs驱动齿状GC集合优化的提议,同时支持内在兴奋性和相关输入在优先将SGCs招募到情境记忆印迹中的作用。