• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Benefits and Harms of Antibiotic Use in End-of-Life Patients: Retrospective Study in Palliative Care.临终患者使用抗生素的利弊:姑息治疗中的回顾性研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Aug 1;14(8):782. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14080782.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
4
Delayed antibiotic prescriptions for respiratory infections.呼吸道感染的延迟抗生素处方
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 7;9(9):CD004417. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004417.pub5.
5
Delayed antibiotics for symptoms and complications of respiratory infections.针对呼吸道感染症状及并发症延迟使用抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18(4):CD004417. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004417.pub2.
6
Antibiotics for exacerbations of asthma.用于哮喘加重期的抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD002741. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002741.pub2.
7
Immediate versus delayed versus no antibiotics for respiratory infections.即刻与延迟用与不用抗生素治疗呼吸道感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 4;10(10):CD004417. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004417.pub6.
8
Interventions for palliative symptom control in COVID-19 patients.干预措施以控制 COVID-19 患者的姑息症状。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 23;8(8):CD015061. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015061.
9
Antibiotics and antiseptics for venous leg ulcers.用于下肢静脉溃疡的抗生素和防腐剂
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 23(12):CD003557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003557.pub4.
10
Methylphenidate versus placebo for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: the MePFAC randomised controlled trial.哌甲酯与安慰剂治疗晚期癌症患者疲劳的疗效比较:MePFAC随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(36):1-47. doi: 10.3310/GJPS6321.

本文引用的文献

1
Is the use of antibiotic stewardship measures in the context of specialized outpatient palliative care sensible and feasible? An interview-based study.在专科门诊姑息治疗背景下使用抗生素管理措施是否合理且可行?一项基于访谈的研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 7;23(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01609-x.
2
Pharmacological treatment of pain, dyspnea, death rattle, fever, nausea, and vomiting in the last days of life in older people: A systematic review.老年人临终期疼痛、呼吸困难、临终喉鸣、发热、恶心及呕吐的药物治疗:一项系统评价
Palliat Med. 2024 Dec;38(10):1088-1104. doi: 10.1177/02692163241286648. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
3
Antibiotics at End of Life: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going? A Narrative Review.临终时使用抗生素:我们现在的状况及未来走向?一篇叙述性综述。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 Aug;42(8):792-800. doi: 10.1177/10499091241282627. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
4
State-of-the-Art Review: Use of Antimicrobials at the End of Life.最新综述:生命终末期抗菌药物的使用。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Mar 20;78(3):e27-e36. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad735.
5
Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis.2019 年全球细菌对抗菌药物耐药性的负担:系统分析。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 12;399(10325):629-655. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
6
Fluoroquinolone antibiotics and adverse events.氟喹诺酮类抗生素与不良事件。
Aust Prescr. 2021 Oct;44(5):161-164. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2021.035. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
7
Care of the adult cancer patient at the end of life: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines.成人癌症终末期患者的护理:ESMO 临床实践指南。
ESMO Open. 2021 Aug;6(4):100225. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100225. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
8
Impact of home-based palliative care on health care costs and hospital use: A systematic review.居家姑息治疗对医疗费用和医院使用的影响:系统评价。
Palliat Support Care. 2021 Aug;19(4):474-487. doi: 10.1017/S1478951520001315.
9
Validation and cultural adaptation of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) for the Portuguese population.验证和文化适应综合姑息治疗结局量表(IPOS)在葡萄牙人群中的应用。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Nov 24;19(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00685-z.
10
Antibiotic use during end-of-life care: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.临终关怀期间的抗生素使用:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 May;42(5):523-529. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.1241. Epub 2020 Nov 11.

临终患者使用抗生素的利弊:姑息治疗中的回顾性研究

Benefits and Harms of Antibiotic Use in End-of-Life Patients: Retrospective Study in Palliative Care.

作者信息

Silva Rita Faustino, Silva Joana Brandão, Neves António Pereira, Canelas Daniel, Neves João Rocha, Andrade José Paulo, Dourado Marília, Ribeiro Hugo

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, Celas, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.

Abel Salazar Institute of Biomedical Sciences, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Aug 1;14(8):782. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14080782.

DOI:10.3390/antibiotics14080782
PMID:40867977
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12382693/
Abstract

Many patients at the end of life receive antibiotics to alleviate symptoms and improve quality of life; however, clear guidelines supporting decision making about the use of antibiotics are still lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the benefits and harms of antibiotic use among patients under a palliative care community support team in Portugal. An observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted on 249 patients who died over a two-year period, having been followed for at least 30 days prior to their death. Data included patient demographics, clinical diagnoses, antibiotic prescriptions, and symptomatic outcomes. The effects of commonly prescribed antibiotics-amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, cefixime, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin-were compared using statistical analyses to assess survival, symptom intensity, and functional scales. Adverse events, primarily infections and secretions, occurred in 57.8% of cases, with 33.7% receiving antibiotics. No significant difference in survival was observed across the antibiotic groups ( = 0.990). Symptom intensity significantly reduced after 72 h of treatment ( < 0.05), with ciprofloxacin demonstrating the greatest symptom control. The Palliative Outcome Scale decreased uniformly, with higher scores associated with amoxicillin + clavulanic acid ( = 0.004). The Palliative Performance Scale declined post-treatment, with significant changes noted for cefixime and ciprofloxacin ( < 0.05). Antibiotics may improve symptom control and quality of life in the end-of-life stage. While second-line antibiotics may offer additional benefits, the heterogeneity of the sample and limited adverse effect data underscore the need for further research to guide appropriate prescription practices in palliative care.

摘要

许多临终患者使用抗生素来缓解症状并提高生活质量;然而,目前仍缺乏支持抗生素使用决策的明确指南。本研究旨在评估葡萄牙姑息治疗社区支持团队中患者使用抗生素的益处和危害。对249例在两年内死亡且在死亡前至少接受了30天随访的患者进行了一项观察性、横断面、回顾性研究。数据包括患者人口统计学信息、临床诊断、抗生素处方和症状结果。使用统计分析比较了常用抗生素阿莫西林+克拉维酸、头孢克肟、环丙沙星和左氧氟沙星的效果,以评估生存率、症状强度和功能量表。不良事件主要为感染和分泌物,57.8%的病例发生了不良事件,其中33.7%接受了抗生素治疗。各抗生素组之间在生存率方面未观察到显著差异( = 0.990)。治疗72小时后症状强度显著降低( < 0.05),环丙沙星显示出最佳的症状控制效果。姑息治疗结果量表呈均匀下降,阿莫西林+克拉维酸组得分较高( = 0.004)。治疗后姑息治疗表现量表下降,头孢克肟和环丙沙星有显著变化( < 0.05)。抗生素可能会改善临终阶段的症状控制和生活质量。虽然二线抗生素可能会带来额外益处,但样本的异质性和有限的不良反应数据强调需要进一步研究以指导姑息治疗中的适当处方实践。