Silva Rita Faustino, Silva Joana Brandão, Neves António Pereira, Canelas Daniel, Neves João Rocha, Andrade José Paulo, Dourado Marília, Ribeiro Hugo
Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, Celas, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.
Abel Salazar Institute of Biomedical Sciences, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Aug 1;14(8):782. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14080782.
Many patients at the end of life receive antibiotics to alleviate symptoms and improve quality of life; however, clear guidelines supporting decision making about the use of antibiotics are still lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the benefits and harms of antibiotic use among patients under a palliative care community support team in Portugal. An observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted on 249 patients who died over a two-year period, having been followed for at least 30 days prior to their death. Data included patient demographics, clinical diagnoses, antibiotic prescriptions, and symptomatic outcomes. The effects of commonly prescribed antibiotics-amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, cefixime, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin-were compared using statistical analyses to assess survival, symptom intensity, and functional scales. Adverse events, primarily infections and secretions, occurred in 57.8% of cases, with 33.7% receiving antibiotics. No significant difference in survival was observed across the antibiotic groups ( = 0.990). Symptom intensity significantly reduced after 72 h of treatment ( < 0.05), with ciprofloxacin demonstrating the greatest symptom control. The Palliative Outcome Scale decreased uniformly, with higher scores associated with amoxicillin + clavulanic acid ( = 0.004). The Palliative Performance Scale declined post-treatment, with significant changes noted for cefixime and ciprofloxacin ( < 0.05). Antibiotics may improve symptom control and quality of life in the end-of-life stage. While second-line antibiotics may offer additional benefits, the heterogeneity of the sample and limited adverse effect data underscore the need for further research to guide appropriate prescription practices in palliative care.
许多临终患者使用抗生素来缓解症状并提高生活质量;然而,目前仍缺乏支持抗生素使用决策的明确指南。本研究旨在评估葡萄牙姑息治疗社区支持团队中患者使用抗生素的益处和危害。对249例在两年内死亡且在死亡前至少接受了30天随访的患者进行了一项观察性、横断面、回顾性研究。数据包括患者人口统计学信息、临床诊断、抗生素处方和症状结果。使用统计分析比较了常用抗生素阿莫西林+克拉维酸、头孢克肟、环丙沙星和左氧氟沙星的效果,以评估生存率、症状强度和功能量表。不良事件主要为感染和分泌物,57.8%的病例发生了不良事件,其中33.7%接受了抗生素治疗。各抗生素组之间在生存率方面未观察到显著差异( = 0.990)。治疗72小时后症状强度显著降低( < 0.05),环丙沙星显示出最佳的症状控制效果。姑息治疗结果量表呈均匀下降,阿莫西林+克拉维酸组得分较高( = 0.004)。治疗后姑息治疗表现量表下降,头孢克肟和环丙沙星有显著变化( < 0.05)。抗生素可能会改善临终阶段的症状控制和生活质量。虽然二线抗生素可能会带来额外益处,但样本的异质性和有限的不良反应数据强调需要进一步研究以指导姑息治疗中的适当处方实践。