• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增长之外:基于注册库的人工智能临床试验全球失衡分析

Beyond the Growth: A Registry-Based Analysis of Global Imbalances in Artificial Intelligence Clinical Trials.

作者信息

Kwon Chan-Young

机构信息

Department of Oriental Neuropsychiatry, Dong-Eui University College of Korean Medicine, 52-57, Yangjeong-ro, Busanjin-gu, Busan 47227, Republic of Korea.

Anti-Aging Research Center, Dong-Eui University, 52-57, Yangjeong-ro, Busanjin-gu, Busan 47227, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 16;13(16):2018. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13162018.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare13162018
PMID:40868635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12385212/
Abstract

: While the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical research is rapidly accelerating, a comprehensive analysis of the global AI clinical trial landscape has been limited. This study presents the first systematic characterization of AI-related clinical trials registered in the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). It aims to map global trends, identify patterns of concentration, and analyze the structure of international collaboration. : A search of the WHO ICTRP was conducted on 20 June 2025. Following a two-stage screening process, the dataset was analyzed for temporal trends, geographic distribution, disease and technology categories, and international collaboration patterns using descriptive statistics and network analysis. : We identified 596 AI clinical trials across 62 countries, with registrations growing exponentially since 2020. The landscape is defined by extreme geographic concentration, with China accounting for the largest share of trial participations (35.6%), followed by the USA (8.5%). Research is thematically concentrated in Gastroenterology (22.8%) and Oncology (20.1%), with Diagnostic Support (45.6%) being the most common technology application. Formal international collaboration is critically low, with only 8.7% of trials involving multiple countries, revealing a fragmented collaboration landscape. : The global AI clinical trial landscape is characterized by rapid but deeply imbalanced growth. This concentration and minimal international collaboration undermine global health equity and the generalizability of AI technologies. Our findings underscore the urgent need for a fundamental shift toward more inclusive, transparent, and collaborative research models to ensure the benefits of AI are realized equitably for all of humanity.

摘要

虽然人工智能(AI)融入临床研究的速度正在迅速加快,但对全球人工智能临床试验格局的全面分析却很有限。本研究首次对世界卫生组织(WHO)国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)上注册的与人工智能相关的临床试验进行了系统描述。其目的是描绘全球趋势、识别集中模式并分析国际合作结构。

2025年6月20日对WHO ICTRP进行了检索。经过两阶段筛选过程后,使用描述性统计和网络分析对数据集进行了时间趋势、地理分布、疾病和技术类别以及国际合作模式的分析。

我们在62个国家/地区识别出596项人工智能临床试验,自2020年以来注册数量呈指数级增长。该格局的特点是地理分布极度集中,中国参与试验的份额最大(35.6%),其次是美国(8.5%)。研究主题集中在胃肠病学(22.8%)和肿瘤学(20.1%),诊断支持(45.6%)是最常见的技术应用。正式的国际合作非常少,只有8.7%的试验涉及多个国家,显示出合作格局分散。

全球人工智能临床试验格局的特点是增长迅速但极不平衡。这种集中和极少的国际合作损害了全球卫生公平性以及人工智能技术的可推广性。我们的研究结果强调迫切需要从根本上转向更具包容性、透明度和协作性的研究模式,以确保人工智能的益处能够公平地惠及全人类。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e6/12385212/d83bf17adf08/healthcare-13-02018-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e6/12385212/b884421fe8f9/healthcare-13-02018-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e6/12385212/19e2b1430e31/healthcare-13-02018-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e6/12385212/679a860ceedb/healthcare-13-02018-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e6/12385212/14661239a2ad/healthcare-13-02018-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e6/12385212/1e539a3f0fd9/healthcare-13-02018-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e6/12385212/d83bf17adf08/healthcare-13-02018-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e6/12385212/b884421fe8f9/healthcare-13-02018-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e6/12385212/19e2b1430e31/healthcare-13-02018-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e6/12385212/679a860ceedb/healthcare-13-02018-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e6/12385212/14661239a2ad/healthcare-13-02018-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e6/12385212/1e539a3f0fd9/healthcare-13-02018-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e6/12385212/d83bf17adf08/healthcare-13-02018-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Beyond the Growth: A Registry-Based Analysis of Global Imbalances in Artificial Intelligence Clinical Trials.增长之外:基于注册库的人工智能临床试验全球失衡分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 16;13(16):2018. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13162018.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Artificial intelligence for detecting keratoconus.人工智能在圆锥角膜检测中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 15;11(11):CD014911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014911.pub2.
4
Research status, hotspots and perspectives of artificial intelligence applied to pain management: a bibliometric and visual analysis.人工智能应用于疼痛管理的研究现状、热点与展望:一项文献计量学与可视化分析
Updates Surg. 2025 Jun 28. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02296-w.
5
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
6
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
7
Are Artificial Intelligence Models Reliable for Clinical Application in Pediatric Fracture Detection on Radiographs? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.人工智能模型在儿科骨折X线片检测中的临床应用是否可靠?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003660.
8
Uterotonic agents for preventing postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis.预防产后出血的宫缩剂:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 25;4(4):CD011689. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011689.pub2.
9
Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 22;2015(12):CD011841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011841.pub2.
10
Tuberculosis Prevention, Control, and Elimination结核病的预防、控制与消除

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Virtual Primary Care.人工智能在虚拟初级保健中的诊断准确性。
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2023 Sep 20;1(4):480-489. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.08.002. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance comparison between generative AI and physicians.生成式人工智能与医生诊断性能比较的系统评价与荟萃分析
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Mar 22;8(1):175. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01543-z.
3
Multiple large language models versus experienced physicians in diagnosing challenging cases with gastrointestinal symptoms.
在诊断具有胃肠道症状的疑难病例方面,多种大语言模型与经验丰富的医生的比较。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Feb 5;8(1):85. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01486-5.
4
Prospective evaluation of artificial intelligence (AI) applications for use in cancer pathways following diagnosis: a systematic review.诊断后用于癌症诊疗路径的人工智能(AI)应用的前瞻性评估:一项系统综述
BMJ Oncol. 2024 May 10;3(1):e000255. doi: 10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000255. eCollection 2024.
5
Evolution of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a 30-year bibliometric study.医疗保健领域人工智能的发展:一项为期30年的文献计量研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 15;11:1505692. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1505692. eCollection 2024.
6
Addressing hidden risks: Systematic review of artificial intelligence biases across racial and ethnic groups in cardiovascular diseases.应对潜在风险:心血管疾病中人工智能在不同种族和族裔群体间偏差的系统评价
Eur J Radiol. 2025 Feb;183:111867. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111867. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
7
The global geography of artificial intelligence in life science research.人工智能在生命科学研究中的全球地理分布。
Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 12;15(1):7527. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51714-x.
8
Randomised controlled trials evaluating artificial intelligence in clinical practice: a scoping review.随机对照试验评估人工智能在临床实践中的应用:范围综述。
Lancet Digit Health. 2024 May;6(5):e367-e373. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00047-5.
9
A scientometric analysis of fairness in health AI literature.健康人工智能文献中公平性的科学计量学分析。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jan 19;4(1):e0002513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002513. eCollection 2024.
10
Registering transparency: the making of the international clinical trial registry platform by the world health organization (2004-2006).注册透明性:世界卫生组织(2004-2006 年)建立国际临床试验注册平台。
Global Health. 2023 Sep 18;19(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00970-5.