Frausing Kristian Park, Flammild Manja Harsted, Dahlgaard Jesper
Educational Program for Psychomotor Therapy, VIA University College, 8900 Randers, Denmark.
Research Program for Mental Health, VIA University College, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 19;13(16):2049. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13162049.
: Mental health issues such as anxiety and stress are prevalent in educational settings, highlighting the need for individualized, scalable interventions. Mind-body approaches are promising for distress management, and this study explored which body-based strategies students found effective. : A cross-sectional study assessed mental health and the use of body-based coping strategies among 152 primarily female students, age 21-52, in the Educational Program for Psychomotor Therapy, a group familiar with such strategies. An electronic survey assessed well-being (WHO-5), stress (PSS-10), anxiety (HADS-A), and use of 13 mind-body practices (e.g., breathing, grounding, muscle relaxation). Participants were grouped by mental health risk and a logistic regression explored associations with coping strategy use. : High-frequency use of more body-based strategies predicted lower odds of being in the high-risk group ( = 0.039), while sporadic use of more strategies predicted high mental health risk ( = 0.022). Breathing and grounding were the most frequently used and helpful practices, with minimal barriers. High-risk students cited capability concerns and time as barriers, while all participants mentioned forgetting to use the practices. : High-risk students use a broader range of practices sporadically, whereas low-risk students adopt selected strategies more consistently. Proper integration of practices through education and training may be crucial for enhancing their efficacy.
焦虑和压力等心理健康问题在教育环境中普遍存在,这凸显了个性化、可扩展干预措施的必要性。身心方法在缓解痛苦方面很有前景,本研究探讨了学生认为哪些基于身体的策略是有效的。
一项横断面研究评估了152名年龄在21至52岁之间、主要为女性的学生的心理健康状况以及基于身体的应对策略的使用情况,这些学生来自熟悉此类策略的心理运动治疗教育项目。一项电子调查评估了幸福感(世界卫生组织-5幸福指数)、压力(感知压力量表-10)、焦虑(医院焦虑抑郁量表-焦虑分量表)以及13种身心练习(如呼吸、扎根、肌肉放松)的使用情况。参与者按心理健康风险分组,逻辑回归分析探讨了与应对策略使用之间的关联。
更多基于身体的策略的高频使用预示着处于高风险组的几率较低(P = 0.039),而更多策略的偶尔使用则预示着高心理健康风险(P = 0.022)。呼吸和扎根是最常使用且最有帮助的练习,障碍最小。高风险学生将能力问题和时间视为障碍,而所有参与者都提到忘记使用这些练习。
高风险学生偶尔使用更广泛的练习,而低风险学生更持续地采用选定的策略。通过教育和培训对练习进行适当整合可能对提高其效果至关重要。