Esmeijer Andrea A, Nasa Prashant, Ntoumenopoulos George, Battaglini Denise, Juneja Deven, Ball Lorenzo, Ehrmann Stephan, Schultz Marcus J, Paulus Frederique, Stilma Willemke
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, The Royal Wolverhampton Trust, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK.
Life (Basel). 2025 Aug 14;15(8):1292. doi: 10.3390/life15081292.
Intubated critically ill patients are susceptible to secretion accumulation because of compromised airway clearance. Various airway clearance interventions are employed to prevent complications arising from mucus retention. This Delphi study aims to collect global opinions in an international expert panel of ICU professionals on the usefulness of these various airway clearance interventions. A steering committee performed a literature search informing the formulation of statements. Statements are grouped into two distinct parts: (1) Humidification and Nebulization, and (2) Suctioning and Mucus mobilization techniques. For each part, a diverse panel of 30-40 experts will be selected, with concerted effort to involve experts from various medical specialties involved in airway clearance methods. Multiple choice questions (MCQs) or 7-point Likert-scale statements will be used in the iterative Delphi rounds to reach consensus on various airway clearance interventions. Rounds will continue until stability is achieved for all statements. Consensus will be deemed achieved when a choice in MCQs or a Likert-scale statement achieves ≥75% agreement or disagreement. Starting from the second round of the Delphi process, stability will be assessed using non-parametric χ tests or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Stability will be defined by a -value of ≥0.05.
由于气道清除功能受损,气管插管的重症患者易出现分泌物积聚。人们采用了各种气道清除干预措施来预防因黏液潴留而引发的并发症。这项德尔菲研究旨在收集国际重症监护专业人员专家小组对这些不同气道清除干预措施有效性的全球意见。一个指导委员会进行了文献检索,为陈述的制定提供依据。陈述分为两个不同部分:(1)湿化和雾化,以及(2)吸痰和黏液移动技术。对于每个部分,将挑选由30至40名专家组成的多元化小组,并共同努力让参与气道清除方法的各个医学专业的专家参与进来。在迭代德尔菲轮次中,将使用多项选择题(MCQs)或7点李克特量表陈述,以就各种气道清除干预措施达成共识。轮次将持续进行,直到所有陈述都达到稳定状态。当多项选择题中的某个选项或李克特量表陈述达成≥75%的同意或不同意时,将视为达成共识。从德尔菲过程的第二轮开始,将使用非参数χ检验或克鲁斯卡尔 - 沃利斯检验来评估稳定性。稳定性将由p值≥0.05来定义。