文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Systematic meta-review: diagnostic accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy for colonic neoplasia with umbrella meta-analysis.

作者信息

Lei Ian Io, Cortegoso Valdivia Pablo, Marlicz Wojciech, Skonieczna-Żydecka Karolina, Arasaradnam Ramesh, Eliakim Rami, Koulaouzidis Anastasios

机构信息

Institute of Precision Diagnostics & Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire, Clifford Bridge Rd, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK.

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

出版信息

Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Aug 30;18:26317745251370845. doi: 10.1177/26317745251370845. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.


DOI:10.1177/26317745251370845
PMID:40894328
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12398663/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is rising globally, intensifying pressure on endoscopy services. Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) offers a non-invasive alternative. Despite several systematic reviews showing reasonable polyp detection rates, clinical scepticism remains. OBJECTIVES: This meta-review and umbrella meta-analysis aim to synthesise evidence on CCE's diagnostic accuracy in polyp and CRC detection, using CT colonography or colonoscopy as the reference standard. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of EMBASE, MEDLINE and PubMed for systematic reviews evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of CCE in detecting polyps and CRC. A qualitative thematic review and synthesis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A bivariate generalised linear mixed model with random effects was used for pooled diagnostic accuracy estimates, and meta-regression was performed using restricted maximum likelihood estimation. RESULTS: Nine systematic reviews encompassing 28 unique studies (3472 participants) were included. For polyps of any size, the pooled per-patient sensitivity was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.69-0.86), specificity was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.71-0.82), and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.81. For polyps ⩾6 mm, sensitivity and specificity were 0.80 and 0.87 (AUC 0.81), and for polyps ⩾10 mm, 0.88 and 0.95 (AUC 0.95), respectively. Second-generation CCE (CCE2) improved diagnostic accuracy across all polyp sizes. For polyps of any size, CCE2 achieved a sensitivity of 0.90, specificity of 0.81 and AUC of 0.82. For polyps ⩾ 6 mm and ⩾10 mm, AUCs were 0.92 and 0.94, respectively. CCE2 showed high sensitivity for detecting any polyp size and polyps ⩾6 mm, with low heterogeneity ( > 0.05,  < 25%). CRC detection sensitivity was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.73-1.00) after excluding cases where the capsule failed to reach the rectum due to battery exhaustion. CONCLUSION: CCE2 has high diagnostic accuracy for polyps and colorectal cancer detection. While technical challenges persist, CCE2 shows promise as a complementary diagnostic tool to help address the increasing demands for endoscopy services.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ed/12398663/64367364d942/10.1177_26317745251370845-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ed/12398663/37dec02d45e8/10.1177_26317745251370845-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ed/12398663/1224ae3bb92d/10.1177_26317745251370845-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ed/12398663/d50c272cfdb1/10.1177_26317745251370845-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ed/12398663/33449442d7c1/10.1177_26317745251370845-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ed/12398663/64367364d942/10.1177_26317745251370845-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ed/12398663/37dec02d45e8/10.1177_26317745251370845-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ed/12398663/1224ae3bb92d/10.1177_26317745251370845-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ed/12398663/d50c272cfdb1/10.1177_26317745251370845-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ed/12398663/33449442d7c1/10.1177_26317745251370845-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ed/12398663/64367364d942/10.1177_26317745251370845-fig5.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Systematic meta-review: diagnostic accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy for colonic neoplasia with umbrella meta-analysis.

Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2025-8-30

[2]
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks

2025-1

[3]
Transabdominal ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound for diagnosis of gallbladder polyps.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-8-15

[4]
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-20

[5]
Accuracy of First- and Second-Generation Colon Capsules in Endoscopic Detection of Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016-5-7

[6]
Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-6-6

[7]
Platelet count, spleen length, and platelet count-to-spleen length ratio for the diagnosis of oesophageal varices in people with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-4-26

[8]
Three-dimensional saline infusion sonography compared to two-dimensional saline infusion sonography for the diagnosis of focal intracavitary lesions.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-5-5

[9]
123I-MIBG scintigraphy and 18F-FDG-PET imaging for diagnosing neuroblastoma.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-9-29

[10]
Are Artificial Intelligence Models Reliable for Clinical Application in Pediatric Fracture Detection on Radiographs? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025-8-20

本文引用的文献

[1]
Follow-up endoscopy rates as an indicator of effectiveness in colon capsule endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2025-5-11

[2]
Towards full integration of explainable artificial intelligence in colon capsule endoscopy's pathway.

Sci Rep. 2025-2-18

[3]
Evaluation of Colon Capsule Utilisation in Europe-CAPTURE EU Survey Findings.

J Clin Med. 2024-12-27

[4]
Exploring the feasibility of home-delivered capsule endoscopy with 5G support: innovations and carbon footprint insights.

BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2024-10-31

[5]
Estimating pairwise overlap in umbrella reviews: Considerations for using the corrected covered area (CCA) index methodology.

Res Synth Methods. 2023-9

[6]
Study of capsule endoscopy delivery at scale through enhanced artificial intelligence-enabled analysis (the CESCAIL study).

Colorectal Dis. 2023-7

[7]
Tutorial: statistical methods for the meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023-4-25

[8]
Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN.

Gut. 2023-2

[9]
The Effect of Prucalopride on the Completion Rate and Polyp Detection Rate of Colon Capsule Endoscopies.

Clin Epidemiol. 2022-4-2

[10]
Systematic review and meta-analysis of colon capsule endoscopy accuracy for colorectal cancer screening. An alternative during the Covid-19 pandemic?

J Med Screen. 2022-9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索