• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度卡纳塔克邦一家四级医院中新冠病毒疾病患者按保险状况划分的自付费用

Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) Among COVID-19 Patients by Insurance Status in a Quaternary Hospital in Karnataka, India.

作者信息

Kamath Rajesh, Sebastian Chris, Jayapriya Varshini R, Acharya Siddhartha Sankar, Kamat Ashok, Brand Helmut, D'Souza Reshma Maria Cocess, Salins Prajwal, Sugunan Aswin, Kamath Sagarika, Kamath Sangita G, Kini Sanjay B

机构信息

Department of Healthcare and Hospital Management, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, India.

Department of Medical Administration, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, India.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Aug 18;22(8):1289. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22081289.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph22081289
PMID:40869874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12386631/
Abstract

Out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) comprises 62% of national health expenditure in India. This heavy reliance on direct payments has engendered economic vulnerability and catastrophic financial pressures (typically defined as out-of-pocket spending exceeding a certain threshold of household income, leading to financial hardship) on households in a country where public health spending remains below targeted levels. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic intensified these financial hardships further, as both total healthcare spending and OOPE experienced significant escalations due to the increased need for emergency care, vaccination efforts, and expanded health infrastructure. A retrospective, single-center study was conducted using data from COVID-19 patients admitted between June 2020 and June 2022. Patient data were collected from the Medical Records, IT, and Finance departments. A validated proforma was used for data extraction. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and the Shapiro-Wilk test was applied to assess normality of billing and OOPE data. Patients were stratified into three groups based on their insurance status, allowing for comparative analysis of OOPE percentages and absolute expenditures. The 2715 COVID-19 patients were categorized into three groups according to their health financing: those covered under AB-PMJAY (42.76%), private health insurance (22.16%), and the uninsured (35%). While the median billing amounts were comparable across these groups (ranging between INR 85,000 and INR 90,000), a substantial disparity was observed in terms of financial burden. All patients covered under AB-PMJAY incurred no OOPE, whereas privately insured patients had a median OOPE that constituted approximately 21% of their total billing amounts, with significant variability among different insurers. The uninsured group represented 35% of the cases and experienced the highest median OOPE, indicating substantial financial risk. The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed critical gaps in India's health financing framework. This study emphasizes the strong financial protection provided by AB-PMJAY, while also exposing the limitations of private health insurance in shielding patients from substantial healthcare costs. As the country progresses toward universal health coverage, there is a pressing need to expand public health insurance schemes that are inclusive, equitable, and effectively implemented. Additionally, strengthening regulation and accountability in the private insurance sector is essential. The study findings reinforce that AB-PMJAY has been highly successful in reducing OOPE and enhancing financial risk protection. Although private insurance reduced OOPE, patients still faced considerable expenses. The stark difference in OOPE of 100% for uninsured patients, 21.16% for privately insured, and 0% for AB-PMJAY beneficiaries underscores the importance of further expanding AB-PMJAY to reach more vulnerable populations.

摘要

自付费用(OOPE)占印度国家卫生支出的62%。在一个公共卫生支出仍低于目标水平的国家,对直接支付的严重依赖导致了家庭的经济脆弱性和灾难性财务压力(通常定义为自付支出超过家庭收入的某个阈值,导致财务困难)。新冠疫情的爆发进一步加剧了这些财务困难,因为由于对急诊护理、疫苗接种工作和扩大卫生基础设施的需求增加,医疗总支出和自付费用都大幅上升。一项回顾性单中心研究使用了2020年6月至2022年6月期间收治的新冠患者的数据。患者数据从病历、信息技术和财务部门收集。使用经过验证的表格进行数据提取。计算了描述性统计数据,并应用夏皮罗-威尔克检验来评估计费和自付费用数据的正态性。根据患者的保险状况将其分为三组,以便对自付费用百分比和绝对支出进行比较分析。2715名新冠患者根据其医疗融资情况分为三组:阿育吠陀-总理-杰纳阿罗克亚计划(AB-PMJAY)覆盖的患者(42.76%)、私人医疗保险覆盖的患者(22.16%)和未参保患者(35%)。虽然这些组的中位数计费金额相当(在85000印度卢比至90000印度卢比之间),但在财务负担方面存在很大差异。所有AB-PMJAY覆盖的患者均无自付费用,而私人参保患者的自付费用中位数约占其总计费金额的21%,不同保险公司之间存在显著差异。未参保组占病例的35%,自付费用中位数最高,表明存在重大财务风险。新冠疫情揭示了印度卫生融资框架中的关键差距。这项研究强调了AB-PMJAY提供的强大财务保护,同时也暴露了私人医疗保险在保护患者免受高额医疗费用影响方面的局限性。随着该国朝着全民健康覆盖迈进,迫切需要扩大具有包容性、公平性且有效实施的公共医疗保险计划。此外,加强对私人保险部门的监管和问责至关重要。研究结果强化了AB-PMJAY在减少自付费用和增强财务风险保护方面非常成功。虽然私人保险降低了自付费用,但患者仍面临相当大的费用。未参保患者自付费用为100%、私人参保患者为21.16%、AB-PMJAY受益人为0%的巨大差异凸显了进一步扩大AB-PMJAY以覆盖更多弱势群体的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbfe/12386631/c9d0882fe714/ijerph-22-01289-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbfe/12386631/c9d0882fe714/ijerph-22-01289-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbfe/12386631/c9d0882fe714/ijerph-22-01289-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) Among COVID-19 Patients by Insurance Status in a Quaternary Hospital in Karnataka, India.印度卡纳塔克邦一家四级医院中新冠病毒疾病患者按保险状况划分的自付费用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Aug 18;22(8):1289. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22081289.
2
Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on Selected Surgeries in the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department incurred by Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya  Yojana (AB-PMJAY), Private Health Insurance and Uninsured Patients in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Karnataka state of India.印度卡纳塔克邦一家三级医疗教学医院中,阿育吠陀·巴拉特·普拉丹·曼特里·贾恩·阿罗吉亚计划(AB-PMJAY)、私人医疗保险以及未参保患者在妇产科特定手术上的自付费用。
F1000Res. 2025 Jan 28;13:1511. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.157203.2. eCollection 2024.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Out-of-Pocket Expenditure for Selected Surgeries in the Cardiology Department for Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (AB-PMJAY), Private Health Insurance, and Uninsured Patients in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Karnataka, India.印度卡纳塔克邦一家三级护理教学医院中,阿育吠陀·巴拉特·普拉丹·曼特里·贾恩·阿罗吉亚·乔纳(AB-PMJAY)、私人医疗保险和未参保患者在心脏病科进行特定手术的自付费用。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 15;16(6):e62444. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62444. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Out-of-Pocket Expenditure Among Patients With Diabetes and Hypertension at a Public Secondary Healthcare Facility in Delhi.德里一家公立二级医疗机构中糖尿病和高血压患者的自付费用
Cureus. 2025 May 31;17(5):e85158. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85158. eCollection 2025 May.
6
Understanding out-of-pocket expenditure in India: a systematic review.了解印度的自付费用:一项系统综述。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 9;13:1594542. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1594542. eCollection 2025.
7
Utilization of tuberculosis healthcare packages under Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana-Arogya Karnataka: A comprehensive socio-demographic analysis.阿育吠陀·巴拉特·普拉丹·曼特里·贾恩·阿罗吉亚·约贾纳 - 阿罗吉亚·卡纳塔克邦下结核病医疗包的使用情况:一项全面的社会人口学分析
Indian J Tuberc. 2025 Apr;72(2):162-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtb.2023.12.008. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
8
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
9
Financial arrangements for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews.低收入国家卫生系统的财务安排:系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 11;9(9):CD011084. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011084.pub2.
10
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
"": Out-of-Pocket Expenditure on Healthcare and the Preference for Private Healthcare Providers in South India.“”: 印度南部的医疗保健自付支出与对私立医疗保健提供者的偏好。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 26;21(10):1287. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101287.
2
The Global Impact of COVID-19: Historical Development, Molecular Characterization, Drug Discovery and Future Directions.新型冠状病毒肺炎的全球影响:历史发展、分子特征、药物研发及未来方向
Clin Pathol. 2023 Dec 23;16:2632010X231218075. doi: 10.1177/2632010X231218075. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
3
Out-of-pocket expenditures and catastrophic expenditures on inpatient care among households of an urban village in Delhi.
德里一个城中村家庭在住院治疗方面的自付费用和灾难性支出。
J Med Access. 2023 Dec 4;7:27550834231213704. doi: 10.1177/27550834231213704. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
4
Impact of Diagnosis-Related Groups on Inpatient Quality of Health Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.诊断相关分组对住院医疗质量的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231167011. doi: 10.1177/00469580231167011.
5
Awareness of the Ayushman Bharat-Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana in the Rural Community: A Cross-Sectional Study in Eastern India.农村社区对阿育吠陀·巴拉特-总理全民健康保险计划的认知:印度东部的一项横断面研究。
Cureus. 2023 Mar 8;15(3):e35901. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35901. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
A Critical Analysis of the World's Largest Publicly Funded Health Insurance Program: India's Ayushman Bharat.对全球最大的公共资助医疗保险计划——印度阿育吠陀·巴拉特的批判性分析。
Int J Prev Med. 2023 Feb 18;14:20. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_39_22. eCollection 2023.
7
An Analysis of the COVID-19 Situation in India in Terms of Testing, Treatment, Vaccine Acceptance and National Economic Performance.从检测、治疗、疫苗接种和国民经济表现方面分析印度的 COVID-19 形势。
Int J Public Health. 2022 Nov 2;67:1604975. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604975. eCollection 2022.
8
Out-of-pocket expenditure and distress financing on institutional delivery in India.印度机构分娩的自付支出和困境融资。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 25;18(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1001-7.
9
Hospital utilization and out of pocket expenditure in public and private sectors under the universal government health insurance scheme in Chhattisgarh State, India: Lessons for universal health coverage.印度恰蒂斯加尔邦政府全民健康保险计划下公共部门和私营部门的医院利用情况及自付费用:全民健康覆盖的经验教训
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 17;12(11):e0187904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187904. eCollection 2017.
10
Impact of Publicly Financed Health Insurance Schemes on Healthcare Utilization and Financial Risk Protection in India: A Systematic Review.印度公共资助医疗保险计划对医疗保健利用和财务风险保护的影响:一项系统评价
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0170996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170996. eCollection 2017.