Suppr超能文献

在典型的沐浴条件和墙面材料下进行的实验室评估中,吸盘把手的效果不佳。

Suction cup handholds have low efficacy in laboratory evaluation with typical bathing conditions and wall materials.

作者信息

Deen Hanaan H Z, Levine Iris C, Montgomery Roger E, Pong Steven, Novak Alison C

机构信息

The KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

School of Industrial Design, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2025 Aug 25;12:20556683251370322. doi: 10.1177/20556683251370322. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Suction cup handholds are sometimes recommended by Occupational Therapists for bathing transfers when permanent grab bars are not feasible. The efficacy of suction cup handholds on typical bathroom surfaces is unknown.

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the efficacy and failure characteristics of two brands of suction cup handholds on six typical bathtub wall surfaces, under environmental and loading conditions associated with bathing.

METHOD

Eighteen suction cup handholds underwent controlled longevity testing under wet and dry conditions in separate sessions. Handhold efficacy was evaluated through (a) visual inspection, (b) manual manipulation, and (c) controlled loading, with days to failure and other failure details as outcome measures.

FINDINGS

No handhold-wall sample combinations were effective over the 28 day test period, with at least one handhold on each wall sample failing on day one. Handhold failure was most frequently due to sliding along the wall surface, and occurred most frequently during manual manipulation testing.

CONCLUSION

Handhold efficacy was poor in a controlled experimental environment. These results can inform clinicians of the risks suction cup handholds pose and assist in clinical recommendations against their use.

摘要

背景

当永久性扶手不可行时,职业治疗师有时会推荐吸盘式把手用于沐浴转移。吸盘式把手在典型浴室表面的功效尚不清楚。

目的

本研究评估了两个品牌的吸盘式把手在六种典型浴缸壁表面上,在与沐浴相关的环境和负荷条件下的功效和失效特征。

方法

18个吸盘式把手在干湿条件下分别进行了受控的寿命测试。通过(a)目视检查、(b)手动操作和(c)受控加载来评估把手的功效,以失效天数和其他失效细节作为结果指标。

结果

在28天的测试期内,没有把手与墙壁样本的组合是有效的,每个墙壁样本上至少有一个把手在第一天就失效了。把手失效最常见的原因是沿墙壁表面滑动,并且在手动操作测试期间发生的频率最高。

结论

在受控的实验环境中,把手的功效很差。这些结果可以让临床医生了解吸盘式把手所带来的风险,并有助于做出反对使用它们的临床建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b23/12379541/c4abe14803b9/10.1177_20556683251370322-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验