• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎间盘突出症患者的手术决策经验:一项定性研究。

Surgical Decision-Making Experience of Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Qian Mingyang, Jiang Wei, Zou Qingsong, Cheng Wenlin, Xu Mengyi, Hua Li, Yu Jiangming

机构信息

Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, 214122, People's Republic of China.

Department of Nursing, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200336, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Aug 22;19:2609-2621. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S539717. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S539717
PMID:40874050
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12380087/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to explore the experiences and pivotal influencing factors of patients with Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) during the surgical decision-making phase to provide a basis for optimizing the shared decision-making between medical professionals and patients and for the implementation of personalized nursing care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phenomenological study employed face-to-face semi-structured interviews, conducted between January and February 2025. Purposive sampling method was used to select 20 patients with lumbar disc herniation from the orthopedic ward of a tertiary hospital. The interview data were analyzed by Colaizzi's seven-step phenomenological analysis method.

RESULTS

The findings of this study revealed that the surgical decision-making experiences of patients with LDH can be delineated into four themes: (1) Motivations underlying the surgical Decision; (2) Decision-making dilemmas arising from insufficient patient information; (3) The multi-dimensional factors influencing decision-making, and (4) Patients express unmet peri-operative needs.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals that surgical decision-making in patients with lumbar disc herniation is a complex process involving the interaction of biological, psychological, and social factors. It is essential to establish a patient-centered decision-support system, integrating structured information tools, psychological interventions, and hierarchical educational strategies. Future research endeavors should concentrate on the potential value of digital health technologies in enhancing the decision-making experience and seek to augment the effectiveness of decision-making aids through cultural adaptation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)患者在手术决策阶段的经历及关键影响因素,为优化医护人员与患者之间的共同决策以及实施个性化护理提供依据。

患者与方法

本现象学研究于2025年1月至2月进行面对面半结构式访谈。采用目的抽样法从一家三级医院的骨科病房选取20例腰椎间盘突出症患者。访谈数据采用Colaizzi七步现象学分析法进行分析。

结果

本研究结果显示,腰椎间盘突出症患者的手术决策经历可分为四个主题:(1)手术决策的动机;(2)患者信息不足导致的决策困境;(3)影响决策的多维度因素;(4)患者表达了未满足的围手术期需求。

结论

本研究表明,腰椎间盘突出症患者的手术决策是一个涉及生物、心理和社会因素相互作用的复杂过程。建立以患者为中心的决策支持系统至关重要,该系统应整合结构化信息工具、心理干预措施和分层教育策略。未来的研究应专注于数字健康技术在提升决策体验方面的潜在价值,并通过文化适应来提高决策辅助工具的有效性。

相似文献

1
Surgical Decision-Making Experience of Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Qualitative Study.腰椎间盘突出症患者的手术决策经验:一项定性研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Aug 22;19:2609-2621. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S539717. eCollection 2025.
2
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
5
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Examining How Technology Supports Shared Decision-Making in Oncology Consultations: Qualitative Thematic Analysis.审视技术如何支持肿瘤学会诊中的共同决策:定性主题分析
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jun 11;11:e70827. doi: 10.2196/70827.
8
Feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for women and healthcare professionals: the LAVA trial qualitative process evaluation.腹腔镜子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术对女性和医护人员的可行性、可接受性及适宜性:LAVA试验定性过程评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul 23:1-21. doi: 10.3310/GJTC1325.
9
The experiences of family members in the year following the diagnosis of a child or adolescent with cancer: a qualitative systematic review.儿童或青少年癌症诊断后一年内家庭成员的经历:一项定性系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jun 12;13(5):293-329. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1698.
10
Contraceptive Decision-Making Among Young College Men and Women in Ethiopia: Results of the Qualitative Study.埃塞俄比亚青年男女的避孕决策:定性研究结果。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231177848. doi: 10.1177/00469580231177848.

本文引用的文献

1
Social media and internet use among orthopedic patients in Germany-a multicenter survey.德国骨科患者的社交媒体和互联网使用情况——一项多中心调查。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Apr 14;7:1486296. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1486296. eCollection 2025.
2
Global incidence, prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs), disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 371 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.全球疾病、伤害和危险因素负担研究 2021 年,1990-2021 年全球 204 个国家和地区及 811 个次国家地区 371 种疾病和伤害的发病率、患病率、伤残损失生命年(YLDs)、伤残调整生命年(DALYs)以及健康期望寿命(HALE):系统分析
Lancet. 2024 May 18;403(10440):2133-2161. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00757-8. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
3
Lumbar disc herniation: Epidemiology, clinical and radiologic diagnosis WFNS spine committee recommendations.腰椎间盘突出症:流行病学、临床及影像学诊断——世界神经外科联合会脊柱委员会建议
World Neurosurg X. 2024 Feb 20;22:100279. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100279. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Quality of Spine Surgery Information on Social Media: A DISCERN Analysis of TikTok Videos.社交媒体上脊柱手术信息的质量:对TikTok视频的DISCERN分析
Neurospine. 2023 Dec;20(4):1443-1449. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346700.350. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
5
Shared decision-making in healthcare in mainland China: a scoping review.中国大陆医疗卫生中的共享决策:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 7;11:1162993. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1162993. eCollection 2023.
6
Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for sciatica: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.手术与非手术治疗坐骨神经痛的系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2023 Apr 19;381:e070730. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070730.
7
Prevalence of Long-Term Low Back Pain After Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation.腰椎间盘突出症后长期腰痛的患病率。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Feb;170:163-173.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.11.029. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
8
The Essence of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Lumbar Disc Herniation, 2021: 1. Epidemiology and Natural Course.《2021年腰椎间盘突出症临床实践指南精要:1. 流行病学与自然病程》
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2022 Jul 27;6(4):319-321. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2022-0042. eCollection 2022.
9
Decision-making styles of patients and general population in health care: A scoping review.
Nurs Forum. 2022 Nov;57(6):1012-1025. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12775. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
10
Kidney transplantation or dialysis in older adults-an interview study on the decision-making process.老年患者的肾移植或透析治疗——一项关于决策过程的访谈研究。
Age Ageing. 2022 Jun 1;51(6). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac111.