• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文版听力自我效能问卷的编制及对老年听力损失患者的心理测量学评价

Development of the Chinese Version of the Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and Psychometric Evaluation for Older Adults With Age-Related Hearing Loss.

作者信息

Jiang Wenling, Zhou Qian, Ren Yan, Li Haifeng, Huang Zhiwu

机构信息

Faculty of Hearing and Speech Science, College of Health Science and Technology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Ninth People's Hospital, China.

出版信息

Am J Audiol. 2025 Sep 2;34(3):722-733. doi: 10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00033. Epub 2025 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00033
PMID:40875288
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study developed and translated the Chinese version of the Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (C-LSEQ), tested its reliability and validity, and explored listening self-efficacy characteristics among older adults with age-related hearing loss (ARHL).

METHOD

One hundred seventy-two patients with ARHL aged ≥ 60 years completed the C-LSEQ by the direct interview method, as well as the pure-tone hearing threshold test, the speech recognition threshold test in noise, and the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly-Screening. Using the random number table method, the C-LSEQ was resurveyed to 20 of the 172 study participants 2 weeks after the initial evaluation. The validity of C-LSEQ was further determined by comparing the scores of three groups: the young adults with normal-hearing group ( = 50), the older adults with normal-hearing group ( = 20), and the older adults with ARHL with no hearing aid use history. Analysis of variance and post hoc tests analyzed sex, education, and hearing loss's impact on listening self-efficacy in ARHL.

RESULTS

(a) Reliability: The Cronbach's α coefficients were > .8, and the retest reliability was > 0.9 ( < .001). (b) Validity test: The composite reliability of the two subscales and the summary questionnaire were all > 0.7, and the average variance extracted was all > 0.5. The level of efficacy was higher with two normal-hearing groups compared to ARHL ( < .001). At a cutoff > 80, C-LSEQ distinguished ARHL from normal hearing with 100% sensitivity and 92.85% specificity.

CONCLUSION

The structure of the C-LSEQ was stable, with good reliability and validity, and it could be used to assess the listening self-efficacy of older adults.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.29954486.

摘要

目的

本研究开发并翻译了听力自我效能量表中文版(C-LSEQ),测试其信效度,并探讨年龄相关性听力损失(ARHL)老年人的听力自我效能特征。

方法

172名年龄≥60岁的ARHL患者通过直接访谈法完成C-LSEQ,以及纯音听阈测试、噪声下言语识别阈测试和老年人听力障碍筛查量表。采用随机数字表法,在初始评估2周后对172名研究参与者中的20名进行C-LSEQ复测。通过比较三组得分进一步确定C-LSEQ的效度:听力正常的年轻成人组(=50)、听力正常的老年人组(=20)和无助听器使用史的ARHL老年人组。方差分析和事后检验分析了性别、教育程度和听力损失对ARHL患者听力自我效能的影响。

结果

(a)信度:Cronbach's α系数>.8,重测信度>0.9(<.001)。(b)效度检验:两个子量表和汇总问卷的组合信度均>0.7,平均提取方差均>0.5。与ARHL组相比,两个听力正常组的效能水平更高(<.001)。在临界值>80时,C-LSEQ区分ARHL与正常听力的灵敏度为100%,特异度为92.85%。

结论

C-LSEQ结构稳定,具有良好的信效度,可用于评估老年人的听力自我效能。

补充材料

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.29954486 。

相似文献

1
Development of the Chinese Version of the Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and Psychometric Evaluation for Older Adults With Age-Related Hearing Loss.中文版听力自我效能问卷的编制及对老年听力损失患者的心理测量学评价
Am J Audiol. 2025 Sep 2;34(3):722-733. doi: 10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00033. Epub 2025 Aug 28.
2
Extended High-Frequency Thresholds: Associations With Demographic and Risk Factors, Cognitive Ability, and Hearing Outcomes in Middle-Aged and Older Adults.扩展高频阈值:与中年和老年人的人口统计学和风险因素、认知能力和听力结果的关联。
Ear Hear. 2024;45(6):1427-1443. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001531. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
3
Performance of Hearing Test Software Applications to Detect Hearing Loss.听力测试软件应用检测听力损失的性能。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e252166. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2166.
4
Translation of Chinese version of the measure of audiologic rehabilitation self-efficacy for hearing aids and the self-efficacy among hearing aid users in China: Application of the questionnaire.中文版助听器听觉康复自我效能感量表及中国助听器使用者自我效能感的翻译:问卷的应用
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 20;20(8):e0330163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330163. eCollection 2025.
5
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the digital addiction scale for children (DASC).儿童数字成瘾量表中文版(DASC)的改编与验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):2599. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23817-7.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Arabic version of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale.《言语、空间和听力质量量表》阿拉伯语版的跨文化适应、信度和效度
Clin Rehabil. 2025 Sep;39(9):1209-1218. doi: 10.1177/02692155251361913. Epub 2025 Jul 31.
7
The impact of early age-related hearing loss on working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise in middle-aged and older adults.早年发生的年龄相关性听力损失对中老年人工作记忆容量及噪声环境下言语识别的影响。
Exp Gerontol. 2025 Jul 2:112823. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2025.112823.
8
[Evaluation of reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale].
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Jul 7;60(7):759-768. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20240630-00390.
9
The association between hearing loss and depression in the China health and retirement longitudinal study.中国健康与养老追踪调查中听力损失与抑郁之间的关联。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20537. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05749-9.
10
Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation.改善成人听觉康复中助听器使用情况的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 12(7):CD010342. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010342.pub2.