Oswald Madeleine, Foley Alana, Goldin-Meadow Susan, Levine Susan C
Department of Psychology, University of Chicago.
Dev Psychol. 2025 Aug 28. doi: 10.1037/dev0002058.
A growing body of research suggests that children's use and understanding of cardinal number gestures (e.g., raising two fingers to indicate "two") reflect greater cardinal number knowledge than their number words alone (e.g., Butts, 2025; Gibson et al., 2019, 2022; Gunderson et al., 2015; Orrantia et al., 2024; Oswald et al., 2025). The present study adds to these findings by examining how often, and in what contexts, parents and their young children use iconic number gestures, with a particular focus on how these gestures are used in relation to number words. In a naturalistic, at-home longitudinal study, we found that 14- to 58-month-old children and their parents used iconic number gestures far less often than number words. Parents used more number words than the children, but children used more number gestures than the parents. Both children and parents used number gestures more often for nonpresent entities than for present entities, even though they both displayed the opposite pattern for number words (i.e., more number words for present than nonpresent entities). Finally, children were more likely to use number gestures if their parents used them (some parents never used number gestures during the observations), but neither parents' nor children's use of number gestures early on predicted children's cardinal number knowledge at 46 months of age. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
越来越多的研究表明,儿童对手指数数手势(例如,举起两根手指表示“二”)的使用和理解所反映出的基数知识,比他们仅使用数字单词所反映出的更多(例如,巴茨,2025年;吉布森等人,2019年、2022年;冈德森等人,2015年;奥兰蒂亚等人,2024年;奥斯瓦尔德等人,2025年)。本研究通过考察父母及其幼儿使用标志性数字手势的频率和情境,为这些发现增添了新内容,特别关注这些手势与数字单词的关联使用方式。在一项自然主义的家庭纵向研究中,我们发现14至58个月大的儿童及其父母使用标志性数字手势的频率远低于使用数字单词的频率。父母使用的数字单词比孩子多,但孩子使用的数字手势比父母多。儿童和父母对不在场实体使用数字手势的频率都高于在场实体,尽管他们在数字单词的使用上呈现出相反的模式(即,对在场实体使用的数字单词比对不在场实体更多)。最后,如果父母使用数字手势,孩子更有可能使用(在观察期间,有些父母从未使用过数字手势),但父母和孩子早期对数字手势的使用都不能预测孩子在46个月大时的基数知识。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2025年美国心理学会,保留所有权利)