Reed Britney, Puranik Poonam, Rodenbarger Andrew, Trivedi Mira, Adebo Dilachew A, Beasley Gary, Bezold Louis, Campbell M Jay, Carr Michael R, Daily Joshua, DeBrunner Mark, Del Grippo Erica, Fifer Carlen G, Hoffman Timothy M, Hupp Susan R, Kurtz Joshua D, Morchi Gira, Owada Carl, Peterson Renuka, Puchalski Michael D, Romans Ryan A, Saidi Arwa, Shenoy Rajesh U, Singh Anoop K, Tunks Robert D, Yohannan Thomas M, Wilhelm Carolyn M, Patel Jyoti K
IU School of Medicine, Indianapolis IN, Indianapolis, USA.
Pediatric Cardiology, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis IN, Indianapolis, USA.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2025 Aug 29. doi: 10.1007/s00246-025-04008-y.
Pediatric cardiothoracic surgeries are high-stakes, complex procedures, typically undergoing prior review at multidisciplinary conferences. This study evaluates practice patterns of conferences throughout the United States (US). Surveys were distributed to fellowship program directors or division directors in 124 US pediatric cardiology centers seeking information on conference logistics, fellow roles, quality improvement (QI), and satisfaction. All 47 responding centers (response rate 38%) conduct presurgical conferences, mostly on a weekly basis (92%) lasting 60-120 min (79%). The conferences are solely virtual (19%) or hybrid (81%). High-volume centers (> 300 surgical cases/year) are more likely to hold multiple conferences (13/20 vs 7/27, p < 0.01) and less likely to designate a moderator (11/20 vs 22/26, p = 0.027). Categorical pediatric cardiology fellows at 33 centers present clinical data (97%), echocardiograms (85%), catheterizations (82%), and cross-sectional imaging (39%), typically beginning in their first year. Most centers report that minor (98%) or major changes (51%) are made to patient management at least "sometimes." Responders rate conferences as very important (median 10/10 on a 10-point Likert scale, IQR 9-10), but satisfaction is more modest (median 7/10, IQR 7-9). Only 17% of centers have a formal QI process. Comments from 42 centers reveal positive themes of collaboration (68%) but also concerns about lengthy (30%) or inefficient (36%) discussion. Conclusions: This survey highlights common practices for pediatric cardiothoracic presurgical conferences. Conferences are collaborative and seen as highly impactful. However, satisfaction varies, and QI efforts are infrequent. These findings highlight opportunities for process improvement and standardization.
小儿心胸外科手术是高风险、复杂的手术,通常在多学科会议上进行术前评估。本研究评估了美国各地会议的实践模式。向美国124个儿科心脏病中心的 fellowship 项目主任或科室主任发放了调查问卷,以获取有关会议后勤、研究员角色、质量改进(QI)和满意度的信息。所有47个回复中心(回复率38%)都召开术前会议,大多每周一次(92%),时长60 - 120分钟(79%)。会议完全采用线上形式(19%)或线上线下混合形式(81%)。手术量大的中心(每年>300例手术病例)更有可能召开多次会议(13/20 vs 7/27,p<0.01),而指定会议主持人的可能性较小(11/20 vs 22/26,p = 0.027)。33个中心的分类儿科心脏病学研究员展示临床数据(97%)、超声心动图(85%)、心导管检查(82%)和横断面成像(39%),通常从第一年开始。大多数中心报告称,至少“有时”会对患者管理做出轻微(98%)或重大(51%)改变。受访者认为会议非常重要(在10分制李克特量表上中位数为10/10,四分位距为9 - 10),但满意度相对较低(中位数为7/10,四分位距为7 - 9)。只有17%的中心有正式的质量改进流程。42个中心的评论揭示了合作的积极主题(68%),但也存在对冗长(30%)或低效(36%)讨论的担忧。结论:本次调查突出了小儿心胸外科术前会议的常见做法。会议具有协作性且被视为极具影响力。然而,满意度各不相同,质量改进工作并不常见。这些发现凸显了流程改进和标准化的机会。