Basios Anestis, Voloudakis Nikolaos, Atmatzidis Stefanos, Velikoudi Maria, Bellou Evangelia, Vamvakidis Kyriakos, Papaziogas Basileios, Koutelidakis Ioannis
Second Surgical Department, G. Gennimatas General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ethnikis Aminis 41, 546 35, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Department of Endocrine Surgery, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece.
Updates Surg. 2025 Aug 29. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02387-8.
Up to this date, there have been no reports on immersive virtual reality (IVR) training in thyroid surgery. The purpose of this blinded, randomized controlled trial was to determine the validity and impact of VR training in residents' education. Nineteen general surgery residents participated in the trial comparing IVR with traditional learning, utilizing a technical textbook as a control. A stratified randomization was used to secure balance in the distribution of residents according to their experience. The examined task pertained to the surgical steps from neck incision up to the placement of the continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring electrode and was evaluated by a blinded Fellow of the European Board of Surgery (FEBS) certified endocrine surgeon. Training superiority was assessed by the outcome measures of Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) score, need for the main surgeon to intervene, verbal answers, and time to task completion. Participants completed questionnaires regarding face validity and perceived benefits of the educational process. Immersive VR group completed the task significantly faster (p = 0.012), at a mean time of 27.25 ± 3.8 vs 35.25 ± 6.5 min in the control group, and was superior in OSATS Overall score (p = 0.035), knowledge of instruments (p = 0.015) and flow of operation (p = 0.021) scores. In the dedicated questionnaire, the participants of the IVR group stated greater overall satisfaction of the educational process (p = 0.002), ease of use (p = 0.015), enjoyment (p < 0.001), repetitivity (0.001), and perceived improvement in surgical technique (0.021). The IVR group dedicated more time in training 39 ± 8.9 vs 27.5 ± 7.2 min (p = 0.014), and performed more repetitions of the educative module, 3.5 (2-5) vs 2 (1-3) (p = 0.003) than the control group. IVR training demonstrated improved outcomes in several translational technical skills acquisition over traditional learning, while yielding improved satisfaction and repetitivity for participants. Clinical trials registration number No: NCT06917755.
截至目前,尚无关于甲状腺手术沉浸式虚拟现实(IVR)培训的报道。这项双盲随机对照试验的目的是确定VR培训在住院医师教育中的有效性和影响。19名普通外科住院医师参与了该试验,将IVR与传统学习进行比较,以一本技术教科书作为对照。采用分层随机化,以确保根据住院医师的经验在其分布上保持平衡。所检查的任务涉及从颈部切口到放置术中连续神经监测电极的手术步骤,并由一名获得欧洲外科委员会(FEBS)认证的内分泌外科专科医生进行盲法评估。通过客观结构化技术技能评估(OSATS)评分、主刀医生干预的必要性、口头回答以及完成任务的时间等结果指标来评估培训优势。参与者完成了关于表面效度和教育过程感知益处的问卷。沉浸式VR组完成任务的速度明显更快(p = 0.012),平均时间为27.25±3.8分钟,而对照组为35.25±6.5分钟,并且在OSATS总分(p = 0.035)、器械知识(p = 0.015)和手术流程(p = 0.021)评分方面更具优势。在专门的问卷中,IVR组的参与者表示对教育过程的总体满意度更高(p = 0.002)、易用性更好(p = 0.015)、趣味性更强(p < 0.001)、重复性更高(0.001)以及手术技术有明显提高(0.021)。IVR组在培训中投入的时间更多,为39±8.9分钟,而对照组为27.5±7.2分钟(p = 0.014),并且比对照组进行了更多次的教育模块重复操作,分别为3.5(2 - 5)次和2(1 - 3)次(p = 0.003)。与传统学习相比,IVR培训在多项转化技术技能的获取方面显示出更好的效果,同时提高了参与者的满意度和重复性。临床试验注册号:NCT06917755。