Rüland Anna-Lena, Andersen Lise H, Hassen Alan Kai, Kinyanjui Carringtone, Ralfs Annika, Grisci Bruno Iochins
University College London, London, UK.
Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Scientometrics. 2025;130(8):4697-4722. doi: 10.1007/s11192-025-05396-x. Epub 2025 Aug 8.
Science diplomacy is a unique research field that is driven and shaped by scholars and practitioners alike. This study examines whether and how recent trends in the broader science diplomacy discourse have impacted scholarship on the topic. First, it examines whether the pertinent scholarship is as international in outlook as practitioners have made science diplomacy out to be. Second, the study investigates whether recent calls to diversify the science diplomacy scholarship have gained traction. It does so by examining how diverse the science diplomacy scholarship is in terms of: (i) The geographical distribution of authors, (ii) the geographical distribution of funding sources as well as (iii) the geographical area that is being studied in science diplomacy publications. Using a network analysis and a large language model-enhanced bibliometric analysis, the study shows that the internationalization of the field-both in terms of author affiliations and geographical area being studied in publications-is only slowly advancing and is currently restricted to a few regions, with the United States and Europe clearly dominating the production of knowledge on science diplomacy. Overall, the study's findings thus corroborate past claims that the science diplomacy scholarship exhibits North-South dynamics similar to those in other research fields.
科学外交是一个独特的研究领域,它由学者和从业者共同推动和塑造。本研究考察了更广泛的科学外交话语中的近期趋势是否以及如何影响了关于该主题的学术研究。首先,它考察了相关学术研究在视野上是否像从业者所认为的科学外交那样具有国际性。其次,该研究调查了最近关于使科学外交学术研究多样化的呼声是否得到了响应。它通过考察科学外交学术研究在以下方面的多样性来进行:(i)作者的地理分布,(ii)资金来源的地理分布,以及(iii)科学外交出版物所研究的地理区域。通过网络分析和大语言模型增强的文献计量分析,该研究表明,该领域的国际化——无论是在作者所属机构还是出版物所研究的地理区域方面——进展缓慢,目前仅限于少数几个地区,美国和欧洲在科学外交知识产出方面明显占据主导地位。总体而言,该研究的结果因此证实了过去的说法,即科学外交学术研究呈现出与其他研究领域类似的南北动态。