Millar S
Perception. 1985;14(3):293-303. doi: 10.1068/p140293.
Two experiments are reported on matching Braille characters in dot pattern and outline shape formats by congenitally blind subjects. In a third experiment subjects' drawings of Braille shapes were analysed. Experiment 1 showed that normal and retarded readers differed significantly when outline shapes 'cued' identical dot patterns, but did not differ when the dot patterns preceded outlines. However, normal as well as retarded readers were faster and more accurate in judging identical pairs in dot-pattern format than in any other condition. In experiment 2 dot patterns and outline shapes were matched at three levels of reading proficiency. Faster readers made fewer errors in matching identical pairs, but all subjects were more accurate and faster with dot patterns than with outline shapes. Experiment 3 showed that blind subjects' drawing of outline shapes is not affected by reading proficiency. Most common were errors of alignment, including 'rotation' from vertical to horizontal axes, suggesting that sources of confusion were spatial position of dots and major axes of alignment rather than mirror-image reversals. It is argued that the results are not compatible with the hypothesis that Braille letters are perceived as global outline shapes by faster readers.
报告了两项关于先天失明受试者对盲文字符的点模式和轮廓形状格式进行匹配的实验。在第三个实验中,对受试者绘制的盲文形状进行了分析。实验1表明,当轮廓形状“提示”相同的点模式时,正常读者和阅读障碍读者存在显著差异,但当点模式先于轮廓出现时,二者没有差异。然而,正常读者和阅读障碍读者在判断点模式格式的相同配对时,比在其他任何条件下都更快、更准确。在实验2中,在三个阅读熟练程度水平上对盲文点模式和轮廓形状进行了匹配。阅读速度较快的读者在匹配相同配对时出错较少,但所有受试者在处理点模式时比处理轮廓形状时更准确、更快。实验3表明,盲人受试者绘制轮廓形状不受阅读熟练程度的影响。最常见的是对齐错误,包括从垂直轴到水平轴的“旋转”,这表明混淆的来源是点的空间位置和主要对齐轴,而不是镜像反转。有人认为,这些结果与快速阅读者将盲文字母视为整体轮廓形状的假设不相符。