Kokornaczyk Maria Olga, Reif Marcus, Loef Martin, Walach Harald, Bodrova Natalia Borisovna, Doesburg Paul, da Costa Batista João Vitor, Pannek Jürgen, Shah Devika, Castelàn Mario, Baumgartner Stephan
Society for Cancer Research, Arlesheim, Switzerland.
University of Bern, Institute of Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Bern, Switzerland.
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jan-Dec;24:15330338251333994. doi: 10.1177/15330338251333994. Epub 2025 Sep 1.
IntroductionThe ability to detect multiple cancer types with high sensitivity has the potential to reduce diagnostic delays and improve treatment outcomes. Diagnostic patterning tests (DPTs), which utilize self-organized patterns in drying body fluids, are a relatively unexplored diagnostic method. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed their accuracy for multi-cancer detection.MethodsSearches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, eLibrary Russia, and other databases for studies evaluating DPT accuracy in cancer detection. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Data were analyzed for (i) untreated cancers, (ii) treated cancers, and (iii) precancerous conditions, with controls comprising (iv) healthy individuals and (v) non-cancer patients. Meta-analysis adhered to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.ResultsOf the 610 identified records, 41 studies involving 15,969 participants were included, encompassing 5265 cancer cases and 189 precancerous condition cases. Pooled sensitivity and specificity across all DPTs were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83-0.93) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84-0.93), respectively. Copper chloride crystallization applied to blood demonstrated the highest sensitivity (0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.96) and specificity (0.93; 95% CI, 0.85-0.97), though differences between tests were not statistically significant.ConclusionDespite high heterogeneity and the potential risk of bias, DPTs showed a satisfactory degree of accuracy in detecting over 50 cancer types. Further research is needed to evaluate their potential for early cancer detection.
引言
高灵敏度检测多种癌症类型的能力有可能减少诊断延迟并改善治疗结果。诊断模式测试(DPTs)利用体液干燥过程中的自组织模式,是一种相对未被充分探索的诊断方法。本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了其在多癌症检测中的准确性。
方法
在PubMed、Web of Science、俄罗斯电子图书馆和其他数据库中进行检索,以查找评估DPT在癌症检测中准确性的研究。使用QUADAS-2工具评估研究质量。对(i)未经治疗的癌症、(ii)已治疗的癌症和(iii)癌前病变的数据进行分析,对照组包括(iv)健康个体和(v)非癌症患者。荟萃分析遵循Cochrane诊断试验准确性系统评价手册。
结果
在识别出的610条记录中,纳入了41项研究,涉及15969名参与者,包括5265例癌症病例和189例癌前病变病例。所有DPT的合并灵敏度和特异度分别为0.89(95%CI,0.83-0.93)和0.90(95%CI,0.84-0.93)。应用于血液的氯化铜结晶显示出最高的灵敏度(0.93;95%CI,0.87-0.96)和特异度(0.93;95%CI,0.85-0.97),尽管各测试之间的差异无统计学意义。
结论
尽管存在高度异质性和潜在偏差风险,但DPT在检测50多种癌症类型方面显示出令人满意的准确性。需要进一步研究以评估其在早期癌症检测中的潜力。