• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于温室气体排放预测的机器学习算法的比较评估:以土耳其为例(2012 - 2021年)

Comparative evaluation of machine learning algorithms for greenhouse gas emission forecasting: a case study of Turkey (2012-2021).

作者信息

Rufaioglu Süreyya Betül, Ismael Amjed Mohamed, Kaplan Fatma, Bilgili Ali Volkan

机构信息

Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey.

出版信息

Environ Monit Assess. 2025 Sep 2;197(10):1075. doi: 10.1007/s10661-025-14496-3.

DOI:10.1007/s10661-025-14496-3
PMID:40890516
Abstract

Accurate forecasting of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is essential for assessing climate change dynamics and developing evidence-based environmental policies. This study aims to comparatively evaluate the prediction performance of various machine learning algorithms using annual GHG emission data (CO, CH, and NO) for Turkey from 2012 to 2021. The dataset was split into 80% training and 20% testing subsets. The input variables consist of the year and emission category codes, while the output variable represents the annual emission value for each gas. The machine learning algorithms applied in the analysis include random forest, decision tree, ensemble regressor, LightGBM, gradient boosting, and XGBoost. Model performance was assessed using error metrics such as R, MAE, RMSE, and MSE. The results indicate that gradient boosting algorithms particularly gradient boosting (R = 0.995) and XGBoost (R = 0.994) achieved the highest accuracy, significantly outperforming other models. LightGBM and ensemble regressor also delivered strong predictive performance, whereas the decision tree model showed the lowest accuracy. The analysis further reveals that more than 90% of total GHG emissions are attributable to CO, and all three gases exhibited a consistent upward trend over the study period. This study is among the few to focus on the annual level forecasting of greenhouse gas emissions in Turkey using machine learning algorithms. It offers a comparative evaluation of random forest and gradient boosting methods, highlighting their performance across different emission categories. The study contributes to data-driven decision-making processes in regional climate policy. Furthermore, the findings suggest that integrating AI-based forecasting tools into GHG monitoring systems can significantly enhance transparency, accuracy, and response capacity in climate governance.

摘要

准确预测温室气体(GHG)排放对于评估气候变化动态和制定基于证据的环境政策至关重要。本研究旨在使用2012年至2021年土耳其的年度温室气体排放数据(CO、CH和NO),对各种机器学习算法的预测性能进行比较评估。数据集被分为80%的训练子集和20%的测试子集。输入变量包括年份和排放类别代码,而输出变量表示每种气体的年度排放值。分析中应用的机器学习算法包括随机森林、决策树、集成回归器、LightGBM、梯度提升和XGBoost。使用R、MAE、RMSE和MSE等误差指标评估模型性能。结果表明,梯度提升算法特别是梯度提升(R = 0.995)和XGBoost(R = 0.994)实现了最高的准确率,显著优于其他模型。LightGBM和集成回归器也具有很强的预测性能,而决策树模型的准确率最低。分析还表明,温室气体排放总量的90%以上归因于CO,并且在研究期间所有三种气体都呈现出一致的上升趋势。本研究是少数几个使用机器学习算法关注土耳其温室气体排放年度水平预测的研究之一。它对随机森林和梯度提升方法进行了比较评估,突出了它们在不同排放类别中的性能。该研究有助于区域气候政策中的数据驱动决策过程。此外,研究结果表明,将基于人工智能的预测工具集成到温室气体监测系统中,可以显著提高气候治理的透明度、准确性和响应能力。

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of machine learning algorithms for greenhouse gas emission forecasting: a case study of Turkey (2012-2021).用于温室气体排放预测的机器学习算法的比较评估:以土耳其为例(2012 - 2021年)
Environ Monit Assess. 2025 Sep 2;197(10):1075. doi: 10.1007/s10661-025-14496-3.
2
Greenhouse gas emissions from on-site sanitation systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis of emission rates, formation pathways and influencing factors.现场卫生系统的温室气体排放:排放率、形成途径和影响因素的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Apr;357:120736. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120736. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
3
Satellite-based assessment and forecasting of greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations in Indian megacities using advanced statistical methods.利用先进统计方法对印度大城市温室气体(GHG)浓度进行基于卫星的评估和预测。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 May;32(24):15006-15024. doi: 10.1007/s11356-025-36583-1. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
4
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
5
Prediction of hydrogen and methane yields from gasification of leather waste using machine learning and explainable AI: An original dataset.使用机器学习和可解释人工智能预测皮革废料气化产生的氢气和甲烷产量:一个原始数据集。
J Environ Manage. 2025 Sep;391:126521. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126521. Epub 2025 Jul 19.
6
Development of Machine Learning-based Algorithms to Predict the 2- and 5-year Risk of TKA After Tibial Plateau Fracture Treatment.基于机器学习的算法用于预测胫骨平台骨折治疗后2年和5年全膝关节置换风险的研究进展
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 12. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003442.
7
Evaluating machine learning-based PM estimation using integrated high-resolution datasets across NDVI levels in an urban-industrialized region.在一个城市化工业化地区,使用跨归一化植被指数(NDVI)水平的综合高分辨率数据集评估基于机器学习的颗粒物(PM)估计。
Environ Pollut. 2025 Oct 1;382:126734. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126734. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
8
Exploring climate pollutants levels and variations in Islamabad's built-environment: A nature-based policy framework for sustainable emissions management.探索伊斯兰堡建成环境中的气候污染物水平及变化:基于自然的可持续排放管理政策框架。
J Environ Manage. 2025 Sep;391:126421. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126421. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
9
Proposal for Using AI to Assess Clinical Data Integrity and Generate Metadata: Algorithm Development and Validation.关于使用人工智能评估临床数据完整性并生成元数据的提案:算法开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 30;13:e60204. doi: 10.2196/60204.
10
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险