• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单节段腰椎固定手术患者竖脊肌平面阻滞不同容量的镇痛效果:一项非劣效性随机试验

Analgesic efficacy of different volumes in erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing single level lumbar spine fixation: a non-inferiority randomized trial.

作者信息

Algyar Mohammad Fouad, Zahra Ahmed Anas, Elshikhali Ahmed Samir, Abdelhameed Essam Ahmed, El Hefny Dalia Ahmed, Moharam Saad Ahmed, ElSharkawy Mohammed Said, Farghaly Omar Sayed, Ahmed Mohammed Awad

机构信息

Anaesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt.

Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03247-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12871-025-03247-z
PMID:40890575
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Using a lower volume (LVs) of local anaesthetic (LA) reduces the risk of toxicity, side effects, and cost. Our study assessed whether the lower LA volumes (10 or 15 ml) have the same analgesic efficacy as 20 ml of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in single-level lumbar spine fixation.

METHODS

Our non-inferiority, randomised, double-blind trial recruited sixty cases scheduled for single-level lumbar spine fixation. All cases had bilateral ultrasound-guided (USG) ESPB before the surgery by bupivacaine 0.25% and were randomised into three groups according to the volume used: 10 ml for the E10 group, 15 ml for the E15 group, and 20 ml for the E20 group. The primary outcome was total morphine consumption. The secondary outcomes were pain scores, time of first analgesic, side effects, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

There was a non-inferior positive analgesic effect in terms of intraoperative fentanyl consumption, time till first rescue analgesia (P = 0.862), postoperative morphine within the first 24 and 48 h, and pain score in groups E10 and E15 compared to group E20 (P > 0.05). Patients who required intraoperative fentanyl were 4 (20%) in group E10, 2 (10%) in group E15, and 1 (5%) in group E20 (P = 0.322). Postoperative morphine within the first 24 h was 3.6 ± 1.23 mg in group E10, 3.3 ± 0.92 mg in group E15, 3.3 ± 0.92 mg in group E20 (P = 0.575), and at 48 h was 6.8 ± 1.65 mg in group E10, 6.2 ± 1.81 mg in group E15, 5.6 ± 1.76 mg in group E20 (P = 0.103). Intraoperative hemodynamic measurements, ambulation time, patient satisfaction, and complications were comparable among the three groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative ESPB is an effective analgesic technique for single-level lumbar spine fixation, with LVs proving non-inferior to higher volumes in clinical outcomes while potentially minimizing toxicity and side effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registration at clinical trial gov. (ID: NCT05892887). The date of the first registration submission was (2023-05-10), and the study started on 2023-06-01.

摘要

背景

使用较低容量(LVs)的局部麻醉剂(LA)可降低毒性、副作用风险及成本。我们的研究评估了在单节段腰椎固定手术中,较低容量(10或15毫升)的LA与20毫升竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)的镇痛效果是否相同。

方法

我们的非劣效性、随机、双盲试验招募了60例计划进行单节段腰椎固定手术的患者。所有患者在手术前均接受双侧超声引导(USG)的ESPB,使用0.25%布比卡因,并根据使用的容量随机分为三组:E10组为10毫升,E15组为15毫升,E20组为20毫升。主要结局是吗啡总消耗量。次要结局包括疼痛评分、首次镇痛时间、副作用和患者满意度。

结果

与E20组相比,E10组和E15组在术中芬太尼消耗量、至首次补救镇痛的时间(P = 0.862)、术后24小时和48小时内的吗啡用量以及疼痛评分方面具有非劣效的积极镇痛效果(P > 0.05)。E10组术中需要芬太尼的患者有4例(20%),E15组有2例(10%),E20组有1例(5%)(P = 0.322)。E10组术后24小时内吗啡用量为3.6±1.23毫克,E15组为3.3±0.92毫克,E20组为3.3±0.92毫克(P = 0.575);48小时时,E10组为6.8±1.65毫克,E15组为6.2±1.81毫克,E20组为5.6±1.76毫克(P = 0.103)。三组术中血流动力学测量、下床活动时间、患者满意度和并发症情况相当(P > 0.05)。

结论

术前ESPB是单节段腰椎固定手术的有效镇痛技术,较低容量在临床结局上证明不劣于较高容量,同时可能将毒性和副作用降至最低。

试验注册

在clinical trial gov注册(ID:NCT05892887)。首次注册提交日期为(2023-05-10),研究于2023-06-01开始。

相似文献

1
Analgesic efficacy of different volumes in erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing single level lumbar spine fixation: a non-inferiority randomized trial.单节段腰椎固定手术患者竖脊肌平面阻滞不同容量的镇痛效果:一项非劣效性随机试验
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03247-z.
2
Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block versus serratus anterior plane block in pediatric patients undergoing aortic coarctectomy; a randomized controlled study.超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞与前锯肌平面阻滞在小儿主动脉缩窄切除术患者中的镇痛效果:一项随机对照研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03256-y.
3
Comparison between ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block and paravertebral block on acute and chronic post mastectomy pain after modified radical mastectomy: randomized controlled trial.超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞与椎旁阻滞在改良根治术后急性和慢性乳腺癌术后疼痛中的比较:随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Nov 21;24(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02810-4.
4
The Role of Erector Spinae Block in Urological Surgeries as a Promising Alternative to Conventional Analgesia: A Prospective Observational Study.竖脊肌阻滞在泌尿外科手术中作为传统镇痛的一种有前景的替代方法的作用:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2025 Jul 5;46(2):23-32. doi: 10.2478/prilozi-2025-0010. Print 2025 Jun 1.
5
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain.竖脊肌平面阻滞用于术后疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 12;2(2):CD013763. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013763.pub3.
6
Dexmedetomidine Versus Magnesium Sulfate in Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Bi-Level Erector Spinae Plane Block in Corrective Scoliosis Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.右美托咪定与硫酸镁用于超声引导下双侧双平面竖脊肌平面阻滞在脊柱侧弯矫正手术中的比较:一项随机对照临床试验
Clin J Pain. 2025 Aug 1;41(8):e1299. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001299.
7
iPACK block with adductor canal block vs. lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial.全膝关节置换术中收肌管阻滞联合iPACK阻滞与腰段竖脊肌平面阻滞(L-ESPB)的比较:一项随机、双盲、对照试验
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2025 Aug 21;57(1):195-204. doi: 10.5114/ait/208016.
8
Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Transforaminal or Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.竖脊肌平面阻滞对行经椎间孔或斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术患者术后恢复质量的影响:一项随机对照试验
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2025 Jul 1;37(3):296-304. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000001003. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
9
Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Versus Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in Pediatric Hip Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Trial.小儿髋关节手术中囊周神经组(PENG)阻滞与腰竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)的比较:一项随机、双盲、对照试验
J Pediatr Orthop. 2025 Apr 1;45(4):e324-e330. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002882. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
10
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain.竖脊肌平面阻滞用于术后疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 9;10(10):CD013763. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013763.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Bilateral erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain relief in lumbar spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant updated systematic review & meta-analysis.双侧竖脊肌平面阻滞用于腰椎手术术后镇痛:一项遵循PRISMA标准的更新系统评价与Meta分析
World Neurosurg X. 2024 Mar 11;23:100360. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100360. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Relationship between injectate volume and disposition in erector spinae plane block: a cadaveric study.竖脊肌平面阻滞中注射容量与药物分布的关系:尸体研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Jul 8;49(7):511-517. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104717.
3
Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
竖脊肌平面阻滞在腰椎手术后的术后疼痛和阿片类药物消耗中的作用:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Perianesth Nurs. 2024 Feb;39(1):122-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2023.06.003. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
4
Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Terms of Analgesic Efficacy in Elderly Patients Undergoing Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Retrospective, Propensity-Score Matched Study.竖脊肌平面阻滞对老年患者后路腰椎手术镇痛效果的影响:一项回顾性、倾向评分匹配研究。
Pain Ther. 2023 Aug;12(4):1027-1037. doi: 10.1007/s40122-023-00527-9. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
5
Ultrasonography guided erector spinae block in spinal surgery for pain management with enhanced recovery: A comparative study.超声引导竖脊肌阻滞在脊柱手术疼痛管理及促进康复中的应用:一项对比研究
World Neurosurg X. 2023 Apr 24;19:100209. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100209. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Efficacy and Safety of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Perioperative Pain Management in Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.竖脊肌平面阻滞用于腰椎手术围手术期疼痛管理的有效性和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Pain Res. 2023 May 3;16:1453-1475. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S402931. eCollection 2023.
7
Efficacy of erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia lumbar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.竖脊肌平面阻滞在腰椎手术后镇痛中的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Feb 16;23(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02013-3.
8
Comparison of analgesic efficacy of different local anesthetic volumes for erector spinae plane block in thoracotomy patients; a prospective randomized trial.不同局麻药容量用于开胸手术患者竖脊肌平面阻滞的镇痛效果比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Feb 6;23(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02004-4.
9
Analgesia and spread of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgeries: a randomized controlled trial.乳腺癌手术中竖脊肌平面阻滞的镇痛效果和扩散范围:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Oct 17;22(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01860-w.
10
Considerations for the Use of Local Anesthesia in the Frail Elderly: Current Perspectives.老年体弱患者局部麻醉使用的考量:当前观点
Local Reg Anesth. 2022 Aug 10;15:71-75. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S325877. eCollection 2022.