Suppr超能文献

基于辩论的护理伦理教育对护生道德敏感性和判断力的影响。

The effect of debate-based nursing ethics education on the moral sensitivity and judgment of nursing students.

作者信息

Sharifabad Hamedeh Heydari, Heydari Sara, Ranjbar Shirin, Nasiriani Khadijeh

机构信息

Critical Care Nursing, International Campus College, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

Department of Medical Education, Medical Education and Development Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2025 Sep 1;24(1):1145. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03795-2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Moral sensitivity and the ability to make ethical judgments are foundational competencies for ethical performance among nursing students. These two moral capabilities are not innate; rather, they must be cultivated through education. The effectiveness of teaching ethical concepts and employing suitable educational methods remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to assess the impact of debate-based nursing ethics training on the moral sensitivity and moral judgment of nursing students.

METHODS

This study was conducted as a clinical trial involving 72 undergraduate nursing students. The participants were assigned to two groups: 37 students in the debate-based group and 35 in the lecture group. Demographic information, Lutzen moral sensitivity, and Rest moral judgment questionnaires were administered before the intervention and one month afterward. In the discussion group, students were divided into two subgroups of eighteen, with each subgroup participating in two 3-hour discussion sessions that addressed eleven scenarios focused on ethical challenges in nursing. In the lecture group, the session was conducted as a single four-hour lecture. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 16 software, employing paired and independent t-tests.

RESULTS

The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of demographic variables (P<0.05).Prior to the study two groups, the mean of moral sensitivity were (52.89±19.33) and (54.87±13.32). In addition, the first and third stories of moral judgment did not reveal a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). After the study, the moral sensitivity scores in the lecture group were (73.16±14.23), compared to (86.13±11.48) in the debate-based group. A statistically significant difference was observed in the mean moral judgment scores between the lecture and debate-based groups (P<0.001) CONCLUSION: Teaching nursing ethics through both debate-based and lecture-based methods can enhance the moral sensitivity and judgment of nursing students. However, the debate-based method appears to be more effective. Given the significance of learning the Iranian Code of Nursing Ethics, both methods-particularly the debate-based approach-should be employed based on the educational context and available resources.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

This study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials ( https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir ) on 2024-06-04, with the IRCT ID: IRCT20240215061016N2. ( https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/76848 ).

摘要

引言

道德敏感性和做出伦理判断的能力是护理专业学生道德表现的基础能力。这两种道德能力并非与生俱来;相反,它们必须通过教育来培养。讲授伦理概念和采用合适教育方法的效果仍是一个有争议的话题。本研究旨在评估基于辩论的护理伦理学培训对护理专业学生道德敏感性和道德判断的影响。

方法

本研究作为一项临床试验进行,涉及72名本科护理专业学生。参与者被分为两组:37名学生在基于辩论的小组,35名在讲座小组。在干预前和干预后一个月,发放人口统计学信息、卢岑道德敏感性问卷和雷斯特道德判断问卷。在讨论组,学生被分成两个每组18人的子组,每个子组参加两场为时3小时的讨论会,讨论11个聚焦护理伦理挑战的案例。在讲座组,课程以一场为时4小时的讲座形式进行。使用SPSS 16版软件对数据进行分析,采用配对t检验和独立t检验。

结果

两组在人口统计学变量方面无显著差异(P<0.05)。在研究前,两组的道德敏感性均值分别为(52.89±19.33)和(54.87±13.32)。此外,道德判断的第一个和第三个案例未显示出统计学上的显著差异(P<0.05)。研究后,讲座组的道德敏感性得分是(73.16±14.23),而基于辩论的小组为(86.13±11.48)。讲座组和基于辩论的小组在道德判断平均得分上存在统计学显著差异(P<0.001)。结论:通过基于辩论和基于讲座的方法教授护理伦理学均可提高护理专业学生的道德敏感性和判断力。然而,基于辩论的方法似乎更有效。鉴于学习《伊朗护理伦理守则》的重要性,应根据教育背景和可用资源采用这两种方法,特别是基于辩论的方法。

临床试验编号

本研究于2024年6月4日在伊朗临床试验注册中心(https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir)注册,IRCT编号为:IRCT-20240215061016N2。(https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/76848)

相似文献

本文引用的文献

10
Role of judgment in promoting nurses' decisions and ethical behavior.判断力在促进护士决策和道德行为中的作用。
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Mar 31;10:88. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_875_20. eCollection 2021.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验