Othman Elham H, Aljafreh Mahmoud, Alosta Mohammad R, Masadeh Rami, Ryan Bridget L, Alsharawneh Anas, Ayed Ahmad, Zeilani Ruqayya S
Faculty of Nursing, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan.
Registered nurse, Jordan University Hospital, Amman, Jordan.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):1166. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13191-w.
The Revised Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness (PPPC-R) scale was originally formulated in English to examine patient-centeredness.
To translate and validate the PPPC-R questionnaire into Arabic.
Translating the PPPC-R into Arabic involved forward and back translations by bilingual experts. Content validity was checked through the Item and Scale Content Validity Indices. The instrument underwent pilot testing and was then completed by 179 patients in the emergency department to examine construct validity using both confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses. Reliability was tested using Cronbach’s alpha to ensure internal consistency.
The Item Content Validity Index ranged between 0.66 and 1, and the Scale Content Validity Index was 0.96. Initial confirmatory factor analysis of the Arabic-PPPC-R revealed an inadequate fit, prompting an exploratory factor analysis with Promax rotation, which identified three factors that explained 66.3% of the variance. The refined model, tested again using confirmatory factor analysis, demonstrated an acceptable fit with improved statistical measures, including CFI and TLI values above 0.90 and RMSEA of 0.07. Reliability testing revealed high internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.949 for the full scale and between 0.889 and 0.906 for the individual subscales.
The study findings showed that the Arabic version of the PPPC-R has good structural characteristics and is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring patient-centeredness.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-025-13191-w.
修订后的患者对以患者为中心的感知量表(PPPC-R)最初以英文制定,用于检验以患者为中心的程度。
将PPPC-R问卷翻译成阿拉伯语并进行验证。
将PPPC-R翻译成阿拉伯语涉及由双语专家进行的正向和反向翻译。通过项目和量表内容效度指数检查内容效度。该工具进行了预测试,然后由急诊科的179名患者完成,以使用验证性和探索性因素分析来检验结构效度。使用克朗巴哈系数进行信度测试以确保内部一致性。
项目内容效度指数在0.66至1之间,量表内容效度指数为0.96。对阿拉伯语-PPPC-R的初步验证性因素分析显示拟合不足,促使进行Promax旋转的探索性因素分析,该分析确定了三个因素,解释了66.3%的方差。再次使用验证性因素分析测试的改进模型显示出可接受的拟合,统计量得到改善,包括CFI和TLI值高于0.90,RMSEA为0.07。信度测试显示出高内部一致性,全量表的克朗巴哈系数为0.949,各个子量表的克朗巴哈系数在0.889至0.906之间。
研究结果表明,PPPC-R的阿拉伯语版本具有良好的结构特征,是测量以患者为中心程度的可靠且有效的工具。
在线版本包含可在10.1186/s12913-025-13191-w获取的补充材料。