Suppr超能文献

衡量患者对医疗服务体验的认知:审视修订后的以患者为中心的患者认知问卷(PPPC-R)的因子结构。

Measuring Patients' Perceptions of Health Care Encounters: Examining the Factor Structure of the Revised Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness (PPPC-R) Questionnaire.

作者信息

Ryan Bridget L, Brown Judith Belle, Tremblay Paul F, Stewart Moira

机构信息

Western University, London, Canada.

出版信息

J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2019 Jul 29;6(3):192-202. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1696. eCollection 2019 Summer.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Given the ongoing desire to make health care more patient-centered and growing evidence supporting the provision of patient-centered care, it is important to have valid tools for measuring patient-centered care. The patient-centered clinical method (PCCM) is a conceptual framework for providing patient-centered care. A revision to the PCCM framework led to a corresponding need to enhance the Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness (PPPC) questionnaire. The original PPPC was aligned with the components of the PCCM conceptual framework and developed to measure patient-centeredness from the patient's perspective. The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure of a revised version of the PPPC (ie, PPPC-R).

METHODS

Eleven new items were added to the original 14 items. The modified questionnaire was administered to patients in primary health care teams in Ontario, Canada. The confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on a subset of 381 patients who had seen a family physician.

RESULTS

The initial proposed 4-factor model first tested with a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) did not fit adequately. Exploratory factor analysis was therefore used as a second step to modify the model and to identify weak items. A 3-factor exploratory model with 18 of the original 25 items was converted into a final hypothetical CFA model that had a good fit (χ =176.795, P<0.01; CFI=0.991; RMSEA=0.030). The third factor contained only 2 items and so is interpreted with caution.

CONCLUSIONS

The validity of the PPPC-R is supported by some congruence between the conceptual framework (the PCCM) and the statistical analysis (CFA), but there is not a 1:1 correspondence. The components of the PCCM represent conceptually what is important when teaching, researching, and providing patient-centered care, whereas the PPPC-R represents patient-centered care as it is experienced by the patient.

摘要

目的

鉴于人们一直希望使医疗保健更加以患者为中心,且越来越多的证据支持提供以患者为中心的护理,拥有有效的工具来衡量以患者为中心的护理非常重要。以患者为中心的临床方法(PCCM)是提供以患者为中心护理的概念框架。对PCCM框架的修订相应地需要改进患者对以患者为中心程度的感知(PPPC)问卷。原始的PPPC与PCCM概念框架的组成部分一致,并旨在从患者的角度衡量以患者为中心的程度。本研究的目的是检验修订版PPPC(即PPPC-R)的因子结构。

方法

在原始的14个项目基础上增加了11个新项目。修改后的问卷应用于加拿大安大略省初级卫生保健团队的患者。对看过家庭医生的381名患者的子集进行了验证性因子分析。

结果

最初提出的4因子模型经验证性因子分析(CFA)首次测试时拟合不佳。因此,第二步使用探索性因子分析来修改模型并识别薄弱项目。一个包含原始25个项目中的18个项目的3因子探索性模型被转换为一个最终的假设CFA模型,该模型拟合良好(χ =176.795,P<0.01;CFI=0.991;RMSEA=0.030)。第三个因子仅包含2个项目,因此解释时需谨慎。

结论

PPPC-R的有效性得到了概念框架(PCCM)与统计分析(CFA)之间一定程度的一致性支持,但并非一一对应。PCCM的组成部分在概念上代表了在教学、研究和提供以患者为中心的护理时重要的内容,而PPPC-R则代表了患者所体验到的以患者为中心的护理。

相似文献

5
Patient-Perceived Patient-Centeredness During Pregnancy.患者在怀孕期间的感知以患者为中心程度。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2023 Nov;45(11):102194. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2023.102194. Epub 2023 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
Communication with breast cancer survivors.与乳腺癌幸存者的沟通。
Health Commun. 2008;23(3):207-21. doi: 10.1080/10410230701808376.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验