Liau Zi Qiang Glen, Loke Wai Keong Ryan, S/O Rangasamie Danakkrisna Vachalam, Liu Yu
Alexandra Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Arthroplasty. 2025 Sep 2;7(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s42836-025-00329-8.
Major robotic systems for total knee replacements necessitate the use of array pins in the tibia and femur. These extra-incisional pins are placed away from the primary incision and may be associated with soft tissue complications and peri-prosthetic fractures. There is currently no standardized, reproducible method for reliably placing pins in the femur and tibia metaphyses. We have developed an all-intra-incisional pin method within the primary incision. This paper aims to describe our technique, analyse the proximity of the pins to the implants, and study complications arising from both techniques.
A total of 102 robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasties were performed using the ROSA, MAKO, and CORI systems. Patient charts were reviewed for their age, gender, body mass index, and ethnicity. Post-operative day zero radiographs of the operated knee were used for measurements in anteroposterior and lateral views, with X-ray magnifications taken into consideration.
Our study demonstrates that intra-incisional pins can be placed 6.52 times closer to the tibial implant compared to extra-incisional pins on the anteroposterior X-ray view radiographs, with no observed significant difference between the complication rates. In anteroposterior view, it allows placement of tibia pins within 8.99 ± 1.21 mm (95% CI: 7.78, 10.2) of the tibial implant, within 5.93 ± 1.29 mm (95% CI: 4.64, 7.22) of the tibia-reamed-surface, and placement of the femoral pins within 6.01 ± 1.37 mm (95% CI: 4.64, 7.37) of the femoral implant. In the lateral X-ray view, it enables the placement of tibial pins within 9.40 ± 1.43 mm (95% CI: 7.97, 10.8) of the implant. Univariate analysis reveals that our technique and pin-distance from the implants are not influenced by patient demographics.
Our study has demonstrated that our technique is precise, not affected by patients' demographics, and eliminates the need for pin repositioning, potentially reducing the incidence of pin-site complications.
用于全膝关节置换的主要机器人系统需要在胫骨和股骨中使用阵列销钉。这些额外切口的销钉放置在远离主切口的位置,可能会引发软组织并发症和假体周围骨折。目前,尚无一种标准化、可重复的方法能可靠地在股骨和胫骨干骺端放置销钉。我们开发了一种在主切口内的全切口内销钉方法。本文旨在描述我们的技术,分析销钉与植入物的接近程度,并研究两种技术引发的并发症。
使用ROSA、MAKO和CORI系统共进行了102例机器人辅助全膝关节置换术。查阅患者病历,了解其年龄、性别、体重指数和种族。使用患侧膝关节术后第0天的前后位和侧位X线片进行测量,并考虑X线放大率。
我们的研究表明,在前后位X线片上,切口内销钉与胫骨植入物的距离比切口外销钉近6.52倍,且并发症发生率无显著差异。在前后位视图中,它能将胫骨销钉放置在距胫骨植入物8.99±1.21毫米(95%可信区间:7.78,10.2)、距胫骨扩髓表面5.93±1.29毫米(95%可信区间:4.64,7.22)范围内,股骨销钉放置在距股骨植入物6.01±1.37毫米(95%可信区间:4.64,7.37)范围内。在侧位X线视图中,它能将胫骨销钉放置在距植入物9.40±1.43毫米(95%可信区间:7.97,10.8)范围内。单因素分析显示,我们的技术和销钉与植入物的距离不受患者人口统计学因素影响。
我们的研究表明,我们的技术精确,不受患者人口统计学因素影响,无需重新定位销钉,有可能降低销钉部位并发症的发生率。