Warwas Felix Benjamin, Thol Felix, Sieber Martin A, Spuck Nikolai, Kramer Franz-Josef, Heim Nils
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center of the University Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, Building 11, 2. OG, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Institute for Functional Gene Analytics (IFGA), University of Applied Sciences Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, Rheinbach, Germany.
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Sep 2;29(9):430. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06504-0.
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of gene-based bioinformatic analysis via next-generation sequencing (NGS) compared to conventional culture and microscopy in identifying microorganisms and antibiotic resistances in odontogenic abscesses. Additionally, the influence of selected clinical indicators including prior antibiotic therapy, in-hospital antibiotic treatment, and detection of antibiotic resistance on length of stay (LOS) was analysed.
In patients undergoing extraoral incision and drainage of odontogenic abscesses at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, two microbiological swabs (NGS and conventional) were taken intraoperatively from each patient. Microbial profiles and resistance patterns were assessed and correlated with clinical data.
Bacteria were identified in 100% of NGS swabs compared to 68.1% in conventional swabs (p < 0.001). NGS detected a median of 8 bacterial genera per sample versus 1 via conventional methods, primarily due to superior detection of anaerobes (median 7 vs. 0). Both methods equally identified aerobic genera (median 1 each). Fungal organisms and antibiotic resistances were also more frequently detected using NGS (p < 0.001). Prior antibiotic therapy was associated with a significantly reduced LOS (p = 0.030). Neither the type of in-hospital antibiotic regimen nor the presence of resistance influenced LOS.
NGS substantially enhances the detection of polymicrobial communities, including anaerobes and fungi, and identifies antibiotic resistances more effectively than conventional diagnostics in odontogenic abscesses.
NGS offers rapid, comprehensive pathogen profiling and resistance testing, supporting quick establishment of tailored antimicrobial therapy.
本研究旨在评估通过新一代测序(NGS)进行的基于基因的生物信息学分析在识别牙源性脓肿中的微生物和抗生素耐药性方面与传统培养和显微镜检查相比的诊断性能。此外,还分析了包括既往抗生素治疗、住院期间抗生素治疗以及抗生素耐药性检测等选定临床指标对住院时间(LOS)的影响。
在波恩大学医院口腔颌面整形外科接受牙源性脓肿口腔外切开引流的患者中,术中从每位患者采集两份微生物拭子(NGS和传统拭子)。评估微生物谱和耐药模式,并将其与临床数据相关联。
NGS拭子中细菌的识别率为100%,而传统拭子为68.1%(p < 0.001)。NGS检测到每个样本的细菌属中位数为8个,而传统方法为1个,主要是由于厌氧菌检测能力更强(中位数分别为7个和0个)。两种方法对需氧菌属的识别能力相当(中位数均为1个)。使用NGS也更频繁地检测到真菌和抗生素耐药性(p < 0.001)。既往抗生素治疗与住院时间显著缩短相关(p = 0.030)。住院期间抗生素治疗方案的类型和耐药性的存在均未影响住院时间。
在牙源性脓肿中,NGS大大提高了对包括厌氧菌和真菌在内的多微生物群落的检测能力,并且比传统诊断方法更有效地识别抗生素耐药性。
NGS提供快速、全面的病原体分析和耐药性检测,有助于快速制定针对性的抗菌治疗方案。