Kambhampaty Abby, Niemczak Christopher E, Leigh Samantha M, Lichtenstein Jonathan, Adhikari Monika, Fellows Abigail M, Magohe Albert, Gui Jiang, Zhang Linda, Massawe Enica R, Buckey Jay C
Space Medicine Innovation Lab, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States.
Space Medicine Innovation Lab, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.
Front Lang Sci. 2024;3. doi: 10.3389/flang.2024.1427392. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
Second language learning is a multifaceted task that benefits across numerous neurocognitive domains including central auditory processing. Existing cross-sectional and longitudinal data show that performance on tests of central auditory processing [central auditory tests (CATs)] worsens with HIV infection. Second language learning may modify this relationship. To explore the relationship between second language learning, central auditory processing, and its interaction with HIV, we assessed the effect of learning English as a second language on CATs among children both living with and without HIV (CLWH/CLWOH) in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Three hundred and seventy-two native Kiswahili speaking children aged 3-10 years old (196 CLWOH, 176 CLWH) were enrolled. Participants completed questionnaires about English language learning, socioeconomic status (SES), and health history. Three central auditory tests-the Triple Digit Test (TDT), the Staggered Spondaic Word Test (SSW), and the Hearing-In-Noise Test (HINT)-were used to assess each participant's central auditory processing abilities. Multivariate linear regression was used to assess the effect of written and spoken English language learning at home and in school on CATs with age, HIV-status, and SES included in each model.
HIV status, age, and SES were all significant predictors of all three central auditory tests, with CLWH performing significantly worse on all three CATs than CLWOH. Children actively learning spoken and written English at home had significantly better central auditory processing abilities on the TDT compared to children not actively learning English at home ( < 0.01) independent of HIV status, age, and SES. Children learning spoken and written English at school performed significantly better on the HINT ( < 0.05) than those not actively learning English at school.
Learning English at home and learning English in school were associated with improved central auditory performance independent of HIV status, SES, and age. These findings also underscore the significance of second language acquisition as a potential mechanism of improving central auditory function within a Kiswahili-speaking cohort. This study found differences in central auditory processing between children exposed to English at home and in school, suggesting differences in language learning in both settings mediated by SES, and this benefit exists regardless of HIV status.
第二语言学习是一项多方面的任务,它在包括中枢听觉处理在内的众多神经认知领域都有好处。现有的横断面和纵向数据表明,中枢听觉处理测试(中枢听觉测试,CATs)的表现会随着HIV感染而变差。第二语言学习可能会改变这种关系。为了探究第二语言学习、中枢听觉处理及其与HIV的相互作用之间的关系,我们评估了在坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆,将英语作为第二语言学习对感染HIV和未感染HIV的儿童(CLWH/CLWOH)中枢听觉测试的影响。
招募了372名以斯瓦希里语为母语、年龄在3至10岁的儿童(196名未感染HIV儿童, 176名感染HIV儿童)。参与者完成了关于英语学习、社会经济地位(SES)和健康史的问卷。使用三项中枢听觉测试——三位数测试(TDT)、交错扬扬格词测试(SSW)和噪声中听力测试(HINT)——来评估每个参与者的中枢听觉处理能力。多变量线性回归用于评估在家中和学校进行的书面和口语英语学习对中枢听觉测试的影响,每个模型中纳入了年龄、HIV状态和社会经济地位。
HIV状态、年龄和社会经济地位都是所有三项中枢听觉测试的显著预测因素,感染HIV的儿童在所有三项中枢听觉测试中的表现都明显比未感染HIV的儿童差。与在家中不积极学习英语的儿童相比,在家中积极学习英语口语和书面英语的儿童在三位数测试中的中枢听觉处理能力明显更好(<0.01),与HIV状态、年龄和社会经济地位无关。在学校学习英语口语和书面英语的儿童在噪声中听力测试中的表现明显优于在学校不积极学习英语的儿童(<0.05)。
在家中和在学校学习英语与中枢听觉表现的改善有关,与HIV状态、社会经济地位和年龄无关。这些发现还强调了第二语言习得作为在以斯瓦希里语为母语的人群中改善中枢听觉功能的潜在机制的重要性。本研究发现在家中和在学校接触英语的儿童在中枢听觉处理方面存在差异,这表明在这两种环境中语言学习的差异由社会经济地位介导,并且这种益处与HIV状态无关。