• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探寻课堂中反社会行为的前因:社会排斥对反社会冒险行为的影响。

Discovering antecedents of antisocial behavior in the classroom: the influence of social exclusion on antisocial risk-taking.

作者信息

Lorenz Corinna, Nicolay Philipp, Hank Corinna, Huber Christian, Ferdinand Nicola K

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.

School of Education, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 14;16:1625978. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1625978. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1625978
PMID:40893857
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12391113/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: This study investigates how social exclusion experiences influence antisocial risk-taking behaviors in adolescents by examining the interplay between classroom social acceptance and experimentally induced social exclusion.

METHODS

Using a sequential experimental design with students in years 7-9 of the German school system (ages 12-16), we first assessed participants' classroom social acceptance within their classrooms through sociometric measures, then randomly assigned them to experience either experimentally induced social inclusion ( = 65) or exclusion ( = 64) using the Cyberball paradigm, and finally measured their antisocial risk-taking using an adapted Columbia Card Task as well as moral disengagement.

RESULTS

Results revealed a complex relationship whereby social exclusion effects were moderated by pre-existing classroom social acceptance status. Well-integrated adolescents responded to exclusion by reducing antisocial risk-taking when potential harm to others was high, while poorly integrated adolescents demonstrated the opposite pattern, increasing risky choices that could harm others. Our exploratory analysis further indicated that moral disengagement was positively associated with antisocial risk-taking and negatively correlated with classroom social acceptance, particularly among excluded adolescents.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that responses to social exclusion are not uniform but depend critically on adolescents' established social status, contributing to our understanding of the cognitive and social factors that shape decision-making in antisocial contexts during this developmental period.

摘要

引言/背景:本研究通过考察课堂社交接纳与实验诱导的社会排斥之间的相互作用,探究社会排斥经历如何影响青少年的反社会冒险行为。

方法

我们采用序贯实验设计,以德国学校系统7至9年级的学生(年龄在12至16岁之间)为研究对象。首先,我们通过社会测量法评估参与者在各自班级内的课堂社交接纳情况;然后,使用Cyberball范式将他们随机分配为体验实验诱导的社会接纳组(n = 65)或社会排斥组(n = 64);最后,使用改编后的哥伦比亚卡片任务以及道德推脱来测量他们的反社会冒险行为。

结果

结果揭示了一种复杂的关系,即社会排斥效应受到预先存在的课堂社交接纳状况的调节。融入良好的青少年在对他人潜在伤害较高时,会通过减少反社会冒险行为来应对排斥,而融入较差的青少年则表现出相反的模式,增加可能伤害他人的冒险选择。我们的探索性分析进一步表明,道德推脱与反社会冒险行为呈正相关,与课堂社交接纳呈负相关,尤其是在被排斥的青少年中。

讨论/结论:这些发现表明,对社会排斥的反应并非一致,而是严重取决于青少年既有的社会地位,这有助于我们理解在这一发展阶段塑造反社会情境中决策的认知和社会因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895c/12391113/98d1de6c5fb8/fpsyg-16-1625978-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895c/12391113/3efc68e75a33/fpsyg-16-1625978-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895c/12391113/5c717607031f/fpsyg-16-1625978-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895c/12391113/98d1de6c5fb8/fpsyg-16-1625978-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895c/12391113/3efc68e75a33/fpsyg-16-1625978-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895c/12391113/5c717607031f/fpsyg-16-1625978-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895c/12391113/98d1de6c5fb8/fpsyg-16-1625978-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Discovering antecedents of antisocial behavior in the classroom: the influence of social exclusion on antisocial risk-taking.探寻课堂中反社会行为的前因:社会排斥对反社会冒险行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 14;16:1625978. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1625978. eCollection 2025.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响照顾者和青少年对青少年人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种的看法及做法的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):CD013430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013430.pub2.
6
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
7
The Effect of Labeling During Simulated Contact on Attitudes Toward Autistic Adults.模拟接触过程中的标签对对待成年自闭症患者态度的影响。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Feb 5;7(1):93-99. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0081. eCollection 2025 Feb.
8
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Combined Effects of Social Exclusion and Social Rank Feedback on Risky Decision-Making Across Adolescence.社会排斥与社会等级反馈对青少年期冒险决策的综合影响
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Mar;54(3):537-558. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02072-w. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
2
Peer problems, bullying involvement, and affective decision-making in adolescence.青少年时期的同伴问题、欺凌卷入和情感决策。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2019 Nov;37(4):466-485. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12287. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
3
A meta-analysis of the relationship between moral disengagement and bullying roles in youth.
元分析青少年道德脱离与欺凌角色之间的关系。
Aggress Behav. 2019 Jul;45(4):450-462. doi: 10.1002/ab.21833. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
4
But is helping you worth the risk? Defining Prosocial Risk Taking in adolescence.但帮助你值得冒这个险吗?界定青少年期的亲社会冒险行为。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Jun;25:260-271. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
5
Executive Functions in Children Who Experience Bullying Situations.经历欺凌情况的儿童的执行功能
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 26;7:1197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01197. eCollection 2016.
6
The ordinal effects of ostracism: a meta-analysis of 120 Cyberball studies.排斥的序数效应:对120项网络投球研究的元分析。
PLoS One. 2015 May 29;10(5):e0127002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127002. eCollection 2015.
7
Preschool social exclusion, aggression, and cooperation: a longitudinal evaluation of the need-to-belong and the social-reconnection hypotheses.学前儿童的社会排斥、攻击行为与合作:对归属需求和社会重新联结假设的纵向评估
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Dec;40(12):1637-47. doi: 10.1177/0146167214554591. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
8
Beyond simple models of self-control to circuit-based accounts of adolescent behavior.超越简单的自我控制模型到基于电路的青少年行为解释。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:295-319. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015156. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
9
Here we go again: bullying history and cardiovascular responses to social exclusion.又来了:欺凌史与对社会排斥的心血管反应。
Physiol Behav. 2014 Jun 22;133:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.014. Epub 2014 May 22.
10
Special issue on the teenage brain: Sensitivity to social evaluation.青少年大脑特刊:对社会评价的敏感性
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2013 Apr 1;22(2):121-127. doi: 10.1177/0963721413476512.