• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会排斥与社会等级反馈对青少年期冒险决策的综合影响

Combined Effects of Social Exclusion and Social Rank Feedback on Risky Decision-Making Across Adolescence.

作者信息

Lorenz Corinna, Ferdinand Nicola K

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.

出版信息

J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Mar;54(3):537-558. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02072-w. Epub 2024 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1007/s10964-024-02072-w
PMID:39198345
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11846755/
Abstract

Adolescents' need to belong and concerns about social status are thought to increase risk-taking, however, not much is known about how feedback about social rank and the effects of social exclusion moderate risky decision-making. To this end, the present study examined how social rank feedback moderates the effects of social exclusion on risky decisions during adolescence. The experimental study included a total of 122 participants (11-19 years; 44% female). Participants were randomly assigned to receive either individual or social rank feedback in the Columbia Card Task after social inclusion and exclusion via the Cyberball paradigm. Contrary to expectations, social exclusion led to more cautious decision-making. Mid-adolescents were most influenced by the combination of social exclusion and social rank feedback, while late adolescents became more cautious with individual feedback. These findings suggest that peer influences also have adaptive effects, increasing sensitivity to risk information, with developmental differences in the role of social rank.

摘要

青少年对归属感的需求以及对社会地位的担忧被认为会增加冒险行为,然而,关于社会等级反馈以及社会排斥的影响如何调节冒险决策,我们所知甚少。为此,本研究考察了社会等级反馈如何调节社会排斥对青少年冒险决策的影响。该实验研究共有122名参与者(年龄在11至19岁之间;44%为女性)。通过网络投球范式进行社会接纳和排斥后,参与者被随机分配在哥伦比亚卡片任务中接受个人或社会等级反馈。与预期相反,社会排斥导致了更谨慎的决策。青春期中期的青少年受社会排斥和社会等级反馈组合的影响最大,而青春期后期的青少年在接受个人反馈时变得更加谨慎。这些发现表明,同伴影响也具有适应性作用,会增加对风险信息的敏感度,且社会等级的作用存在发育差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f050/11846755/e20a728c203a/10964_2024_2072_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f050/11846755/f11eca414936/10964_2024_2072_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f050/11846755/c3e2edd9c42f/10964_2024_2072_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f050/11846755/b864f669d1b4/10964_2024_2072_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f050/11846755/0529578a1720/10964_2024_2072_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f050/11846755/7edbffae6d08/10964_2024_2072_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f050/11846755/10ab49682d70/10964_2024_2072_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f050/11846755/986312af5496/10964_2024_2072_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f050/11846755/28f9e2c1cbbc/10964_2024_2072_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f050/11846755/e20a728c203a/10964_2024_2072_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f050/11846755/f11eca414936/10964_2024_2072_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f050/11846755/c3e2edd9c42f/10964_2024_2072_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f050/11846755/b864f669d1b4/10964_2024_2072_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f050/11846755/0529578a1720/10964_2024_2072_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f050/11846755/7edbffae6d08/10964_2024_2072_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f050/11846755/10ab49682d70/10964_2024_2072_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f050/11846755/986312af5496/10964_2024_2072_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f050/11846755/28f9e2c1cbbc/10964_2024_2072_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f050/11846755/e20a728c203a/10964_2024_2072_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Combined Effects of Social Exclusion and Social Rank Feedback on Risky Decision-Making Across Adolescence.社会排斥与社会等级反馈对青少年期冒险决策的综合影响
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Mar;54(3):537-558. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02072-w. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
2
Risk-taking and social exclusion in adolescence: neural mechanisms underlying peer influences on decision-making.青少年时期的冒险行为和社会排斥:同伴对决策影响的神经机制。
Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 15;82:23-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.061. Epub 2013 May 24.
3
Is the Peer Presence Effect on Heightened Adolescent Risky Decision-Making only Present in Males?同伴在场效应对青少年高风险决策的影响是否仅存在于男性中?
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Mar;49(3):693-705. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01179-9. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
4
Joint Effects of Peer Presence and Fatigue on Risk and Reward Processing in Late Adolescence.同伴在场和疲劳对青少年后期风险和奖励处理的联合影响。
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Sep;46(9):1878-1890. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0690-8. Epub 2017 May 22.
5
Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: an experimental study.同伴对青少年和成年人冒险、风险偏好及风险决策的影响:一项实验研究
Dev Psychol. 2005 Jul;41(4):625-35. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.625.
6
Parental rearing behavior prospectively predicts adolescents' risky decision-making and feedback-related electrical brain activity.父母养育行为前瞻性地预测青少年的冒险决策和反馈相关的大脑电活动。
Dev Sci. 2013 May;16(3):409-27. doi: 10.1111/desc.12026.
7
Investigation of attachment social exclusion and risky behaviors in adolescents.青少年依恋、社会排斥与危险行为的调查。
BMC Psychol. 2025 May 8;13(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02822-w.
8
Similarities between adult female crack cocaine users and adolescents in risky decision-making scenarios.成年女性可卡因吸食者与青少年在风险决策情境中的相似之处。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2016 Sep;38(7):795-810. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1167171. Epub 2016 May 17.
9
Effects of anonymous peer observation on adolescents' preference for immediate rewards.匿名同伴观察对青少年即时奖励偏好的影响。
Dev Sci. 2014 Jan;17(1):71-8. doi: 10.1111/desc.12099. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
10
The effect of social rank feedback on risk taking and associated reward processes in adolescent girls.社会等级反馈对青春期女孩冒险行为及相关奖励过程的影响。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Feb 1;12(2):240-250. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw125.

引用本文的文献

1
Discovering antecedents of antisocial behavior in the classroom: the influence of social exclusion on antisocial risk-taking.探寻课堂中反社会行为的前因:社会排斥对反社会冒险行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 14;16:1625978. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1625978. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Explore with Me: Peer Observation Decreases Risk-Taking but Increases Exploration Tendencies across Adolescence.探索:同伴观察减少青少年冒险行为但增加探索倾向。
J Youth Adolesc. 2022 Sep;51(9):1693-1707. doi: 10.1007/s10964-022-01608-2. Epub 2022 May 9.
2
Developmental differences in processing the valence and magnitude of incentive cues: Mid-adolescents are more sensitive to potential gains than early- or late-adolescents.青少年中期对潜在收益的敏感性强于青少年早期和晚期:激励线索效价和大小加工的发展差异。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2022 Jun;22(3):557-573. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00978-7. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
3
Social norms in adolescent risk engagement and recommendation.
青少年风险参与和推荐的社会规范。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2021 Sep;39(3):481-498. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12369. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
4
Disentangling Risk and Uncertainty: When Risk-Taking Measures Are Not About Risk.厘清风险与不确定性:当冒险措施与风险无关时。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 15;9:2194. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02194. eCollection 2018.
5
Causes and Consequences of Social Exclusion and Peer Rejection Among Children and Adolescents.儿童和青少年社会排斥与同伴拒绝的原因及后果
Rep Emot Behav Disord Youth. 2017 Summer;17(3):71-75.
6
The Influence of Different Kinds of Incentives on Decision-Making and Cognitive Control in Adolescent Development: A Review of Behavioral and Neuroscientific Studies.不同类型的激励对青少年发展中决策和认知控制的影响:行为与神经科学研究综述
Front Psychol. 2018 May 23;9:768. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00768. eCollection 2018.
7
Dissecting "Peer Presence" and "Decisions" to Deepen Understanding of Peer Influence on Adolescent Risky Choice.剖析“同伴在场”和“决策”,深入理解同伴对青少年冒险选择的影响。
Child Dev. 2019 Nov;90(6):2086-2103. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13081. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
8
Importance of investing in adolescence from a developmental science perspective.从发展科学的角度看投资青春期的重要性。
Nature. 2018 Feb 21;554(7693):441-450. doi: 10.1038/nature25770.
9
Beyond stereotypes of adolescent risk taking: Placing the adolescent brain in developmental context.超越青少年冒险行为的刻板印象:将青少年大脑置于发育背景中。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Oct;27:19-34. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
10
Peers Increase Late Adolescents' Exploratory Behavior and Sensitivity to Positive and Negative Feedback.同伴会增加青少年晚期的探索行为,并使其对正、负反馈更加敏感。
J Res Adolesc. 2016 Dec;26(4):696-705. doi: 10.1111/jora.12219. Epub 2015 Aug 19.