Zhang Juntao, Zhang Yiming, Weng Ying, Hosseini Akram A, Wang Boding, Dening Tom, Fan Weinyu, Xiao Weizhong
School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo, 315100 China.
School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG8 1BB UK.
Artif Intell Rev. 2025;58(11):357. doi: 10.1007/s10462-025-11347-y. Epub 2025 Aug 29.
Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a vital tool for the diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease (PD). This study presents a comprehensive review on the applications of ML for computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) of PD. We conducted a comprehensive review by searching articles published from 2010 till 2024. The risk of bias is assessed using the PROBAST checklist. Case studies are also provided. This review includes 117 articles with six categories: neuroimaging data (20.5%); voice data (40.2%); handwriting data (12.0%); gait data (14.5%); EEG data (8.5%); and other data (4.3%). According to the PROBAST checklist, only 28 articles (23.9%) have a low risk of bias. A benchmark case study is conducted for five different data modalities. We also discuss current limitations and future directions of applying ML to the diagnosis of PD. This review reduces the gap between Artificial Intelligence (AI) and PD medical professionals and provides helpful information for future research.
机器学习(ML)已成为诊断帕金森病(PD)的重要工具。本研究对ML在PD计算机辅助诊断(CAD)中的应用进行了全面综述。我们通过检索2010年至2024年发表的文章进行了全面综述。使用PROBAST清单评估偏倚风险。还提供了案例研究。本综述包括117篇文章,分为六类:神经影像数据(20.5%);语音数据(40.2%);笔迹数据(12.0%);步态数据(14.5%);脑电图数据(8.5%);以及其他数据(4.3%)。根据PROBAST清单,只有28篇文章(23.9%)的偏倚风险较低。针对五种不同的数据模式进行了基准案例研究。我们还讨论了将ML应用于PD诊断的当前局限性和未来方向。本综述缩小了人工智能(AI)与PD医学专业人员之间的差距,并为未来研究提供了有用信息。