Joly Brenda M, Gray Carolyn, Rand Julia, Bizier Katy, Pearson Karen
Public Health Program, Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine, Portland, USA.
Cutler Institute for Health and Social Policy, Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine, Portland, USA.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Aug 11;9(1):e161. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.10076. eCollection 2025.
Strengthening the research workforce is essential for meeting the evolving needs and challenges in the health and biomedical fields. To do so effectively, it requires an understanding of how the experiences of a researcher shift over time and how one's research career evolves, particularly as supports are put in place to foster research. This narrative review provides a summary of published individual-level assessment measures and survey tools from 2000-2024. All measures were abstracted, classified, and coded during analyses to describe the areas of focus, and they were organized into one of six research categories. The review identified a range of measures and methods across all categories. However, the measures were often narrow, focused on outputs, and not ideal for assessing the full range of experiences a researcher may have throughout their career. The most common metrics were related to research productivity and bibliometric measures. Our review of survey tools revealed a gap in comprehensive approaches available to assess an individual's research experience, efforts, supports, and impact. As efforts expand to evaluate and study the research workforce, tools that focus on a broad range of individual-level measures, tied to specific underlying constructs and drawn from the literature, may prove useful.
加强研究人员队伍对于满足健康和生物医学领域不断变化的需求与挑战至关重要。要有效地做到这一点,需要了解研究人员的经历如何随时间变化,以及个人的研究职业生涯如何发展,特别是在为促进研究而提供支持的情况下。本叙述性综述总结了2000年至2024年已发表的个人层面评估措施和调查工具。在分析过程中,对所有措施进行了提取、分类和编码,以描述重点领域,并将它们归入六个研究类别之一。该综述在所有类别中都确定了一系列措施和方法。然而,这些措施往往较为狭窄,侧重于产出,并不适合评估研究人员在整个职业生涯中可能拥有的全部经历。最常见的指标与研究生产力和文献计量学措施有关。我们对调查工具的综述揭示了在可用于评估个人研究经历、努力、支持和影响的综合方法方面存在差距。随着评估和研究研究人员队伍的工作不断扩大,侧重于广泛的个人层面措施、与特定潜在结构相关且源自文献的工具可能会被证明是有用的。