Suppr超能文献

考试顺序和时间安排作为整骨医学学生COMLEX-USA和USMLE成绩的预测指标

Exam Sequence and Timing as Predictors of COMLEX-USA and USMLE Performance in Osteopathic Medical Students.

作者信息

Blodgett Maurice, Schmidt Martin, Beaty Jennifer S, Pinney Brian, Hays Bryan

机构信息

Department of Primary Care, Des Moines University, West Des Moines, IA, USA.

Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Des Moines University, West Des Moines, IA, USA.

出版信息

Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 Aug 25;16:1537-1545. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S550972. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study examined the impact of exam sequence and timing on the performance of osteopathic medical students on the COMLEX-USA Level 1 and Level 2 and USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 examinations.

METHODS

Two cohorts were analyzed: 364 osteopathic medical students who completed both COMLEX-USA Level 1 and USMLE Step 1 between 2020 and 2022 (prior to the implementation of pass/fail grading), and 734 osteopathic medical students who completed both COMLEX-USA Level 2 and USMLE Step 2 between 2021 and 2025. Student performance was evaluated based on the sequence of examinations and intervals between them. Because the scores did not follow a normal distribution, as indicated by the Shapiro-Wilk test, the Mann-Whitney -test was employed to compare the median scores between the groups.

RESULTS

Osteopathic medical students who undertook the USMLE examinations first consistently achieved higher scores than those who undertook the COMLEX-USA examinations first across most academic quartiles. Shorter exam intervals (1-7 days) were associated with higher scores, whereas longer intervals (≥8 days) were correlated with significantly lower scores. The effects of exam order and timing varied across performance quartiles, with lower-performing students deriving the greatest benefit from taking the USMLE examinations first and maintaining shorter intervals between the exams.

CONCLUSION

Strategic scheduling of exams may enhance performance on both the COMLEX-USA and USMLE examinations, particularly for lower-performing students. However, individual factors should be considered when implementing these strategies. These findings offer valuable insights for osteopathic medical students and educators in planning exam preparation and scheduling.

摘要

目的

本研究考察了考试顺序和时间安排对整骨医学学生在美国综合骨科医学执照考试(COMLEX-USA)1级和2级以及美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第1步和第2步考试中的表现的影响。

方法

分析了两个队列:364名在2020年至2022年期间完成了COMLEX-USA 1级和USMLE第1步考试(在采用及格/不及格评分之前)的整骨医学学生,以及734名在2021年至2025年期间完成了COMLEX-USA 2级和USMLE第2步考试的整骨医学学生。根据考试顺序及其间隔时间对学生表现进行评估。由于夏皮罗-威尔克检验表明分数不呈正态分布,因此采用曼-惠特尼检验来比较组间中位数分数。

结果

在大多数学术四分位数中,首先参加USMLE考试的整骨医学学生的成绩始终高于首先参加COMLEX-USA考试的学生。较短的考试间隔时间(1 - 7天)与较高分数相关,而较长的间隔时间(≥8天)则与显著较低的分数相关。考试顺序和时间安排的影响在不同表现四分位数中有所不同,表现较差的学生从首先参加USMLE考试并保持较短的考试间隔时间中受益最大。

结论

考试的策略性安排可能会提高COMLEX-USA和USMLE考试的成绩,特别是对于表现较差的学生。然而,在实施这些策略时应考虑个体因素。这些发现为整骨医学学生和教育工作者在规划考试准备和安排方面提供了有价值的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ab7/12396519/5eaa5531eb9a/AMEP-16-1537-g0001.jpg

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
The Unintended Consequences of USMLE Step 1 Pass/Fail: Heightened Barriers in the Residency Match for Competitive Specialties.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2025 Oct;22(10):1237-1239. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2025.06.017. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
2
The Rising Importance of Research Output in ENT Residency Applications Without Numeric Step 1 Scores.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2025 Nov;134(11):870-872. doi: 10.1177/00034894251347477. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
7
A Concordance Study of COMLEX-USA and USMLE Scores.COMLEX-USA 与 USMLE 成绩的一致性研究。
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Feb;14(1):53-59. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-00499.1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验