• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺康复计划设计对慢性阻塞性肺疾病疗效的影响:一项系统评价和成分网络荟萃分析

Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation programme design on effectiveness in COPD: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ward Thomas J C, Latimer Lorna, Daynes Enya, Freeman Suzanne C, Ward Sarah, Xu Jiaqing, Haris Muhammed, Bakali Majda, Reap Sophie, Iqbal Mamoon, Wang Lin, Mavilakandy Akash, Olaiya Aarinola, Aung Hnin, Harvey-Dunstan Theresa C, Singh Sally J, Greening Neil J, Evans Rachael A, Steiner Michael C, Sutton Alex J

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Aug 20;87:103433. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103433. eCollection 2025 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103433
PMID:40896469
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12396583/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a key treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recommended by all guidelines. However, programmes vary widely and the optimal combination of components to maximise benefits and efficiency remains unknown. We aimed to use the novel technique of component network meta-analysis (cNMA) to investigate the relative contribution of 1) exercise modality and intensity, 2) non-exercise components, 3) type of supervision, and 4) programme duration of PR for people with COPD.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases searched in October 2023 with no date or language restrictions. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which included an intervention involving exercise for people with COPD. We present outcomes of exercise capacity, breathlessness and health related quality of life (HRQoL). Screening and eligibility were assessed by two independent reviewers. cNMA, a technique developed to investigate complex interventions such as PR, was conducted to examine the contribution of single components within diverse multicomponent interventions controlling for cohort demographics. PROSPERO: CRD42022322058.

FINDINGS

We included 337 RCTs with 18,911 participants and 227 intervention components. In-person supervision enhanced gains in exercise capacity (Standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.41, 95% CrI 0.20; 0.63), HRQoL (0.43 95% CrI 0.19; 0.68) and breathlessness (0.31 95% CrI 0.04; 0.58) over exercise training alone with moderate to high certainty. Remote supervision increased gains in exercise capacity (0.40 95% CrI 0.08; 0.73) with trends towards improvements in HRQoL and breathlessness, with low certainty. Aerobic training appeared to be most effective for all outcomes at high or very high intensity but with low certainty. Addition of structured education did not improve any outcome. Psychological interventions led improvements in exercise capacity (0.37 95% CrI 0.01; 0.73, low certainty) and HRQoL (0.54 95% CrI 0.18; 0.91, moderate certainty). There was trend towards improvements in breathlessness with addition of breathing exercises (0.26 95% CrI -0.04; 0.56, low certainty). Programme duration did not impact outcomes. For outcomes of exercise capacity, HRQoL and breathlessness there were 60%, 63% and 59% studies at high risk of bias respectively.

INTERPRETATION

This large-scale analysis of over 300 randomised PR trials found the strongest effects for in-person supervised and prescribed aerobic exercise training with less certainty for the benefit of other commonly used PR components and delivery methods.

FUNDING

This research was funded through a National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands grant (2.12) and carried out at the NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC).

摘要

背景

肺康复(PR)是所有指南推荐的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的关键治疗方法。然而,各项目差异很大,能使效益和效率最大化的最佳组成部分组合仍不明确。我们旨在使用成分网络荟萃分析(cNMA)这项新技术,来研究1)运动方式和强度、2)非运动成分、3)监督类型以及4)COPD患者肺康复项目持续时间的相对贡献。

方法

2023年10月检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL和Cochrane数据库,无日期或语言限制。我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT),其中包括针对COPD患者的涉及运动的干预措施。我们呈现运动能力、呼吸困难和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的结果。由两名独立 reviewers 评估筛选和合格性。进行cNMA(一种为研究如PR等复杂干预措施而开发的技术),以检验在控制队列人口统计学特征的情况下,不同多成分干预措施中单个成分的贡献。PROSPERO:CRD42022322058。

结果

我们纳入了337项RCT,共18911名参与者和227个干预成分。与单独的运动训练相比,面对面监督能使运动能力(标准化均数差(SMD)0.41,95% CrI 0.20;0.63)、HRQoL(0.43,95% CrI 0.19;0.68)和呼吸困难(0.31,)的改善更显著,具有中到高度确定性。远程监督能增加运动能力的改善(0.40,95% CrI 0.08;0.73),对HRQoL和呼吸困难有改善趋势,但确定性较低。有氧训练在高强度或非常高强度时似乎对所有结果最有效,但确定性较低。添加结构化教育并未改善任何结果。心理干预能改善运动能力(0.37,95% CrI 0.01;0.73,低确定性)和HRQoL(0.54,95% CrI 0.18;0.91,中度确定性)。添加呼吸训练有改善呼吸困难的趋势(0.26,95% CrI -0.04;0.56,低确定性)。项目持续时间未影响结果。对于运动能力、HRQoL和呼吸困难的结果,分别有60%、63%和59%的研究存在高偏倚风险。

解读

这项对300多项随机肺康复试验的大规模分析发现,面对面监督和规定的有氧训练效果最强,而对于其他常用的肺康复成分和实施方法的益处,确定性较低。

资助

本研究由国家卫生与保健研究机构(NIHR)东米德兰兹应用研究合作基金(2.12)资助,并在NIHR莱斯特生物医学研究中心(BRC)开展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db28/12396583/cdc51317cb25/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db28/12396583/485672801ca9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db28/12396583/0de80d07b959/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db28/12396583/cdc51317cb25/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db28/12396583/485672801ca9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db28/12396583/0de80d07b959/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db28/12396583/cdc51317cb25/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation programme design on effectiveness in COPD: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis.肺康复计划设计对慢性阻塞性肺疾病疗效的影响:一项系统评价和成分网络荟萃分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Aug 20;87:103433. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103433. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Inspiratory muscle training, with or without concomitant pulmonary rehabilitation, for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).吸气肌训练,联合或不联合肺康复治疗,用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 6;1(1):CD013778. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013778.pub2.
3
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
4
Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的肺康复治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 23;2015(2):CD003793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003793.pub3.
5
Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta-analysis.行为干预戒烟:综述和网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 4;1(1):CD013229. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013229.pub2.
6
Pulmonary rehabilitation versus usual care for adults with asthma.肺康复治疗与常规护理对哮喘成人的影响比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 22;8(8):CD013485. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013485.pub2.
7
Pharmacological interventions for the prevention of bleeding in people undergoing elective hip or knee surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.择期髋关节或膝关节手术患者预防出血的药物干预措施:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 16;1(1):CD013295. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013295.pub2.
8
Pharmacological and electronic cigarette interventions for smoking cessation in adults: component network meta-analyses.药物和电子烟干预成人戒烟的效果:成分网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 12;9(9):CD015226. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015226.pub2.
9
Supported self-management for patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): an evidence synthesis and economic analysis.中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的支持性自我管理:证据综合与经济分析
Health Technol Assess. 2015 May;19(36):1-516. doi: 10.3310/hta19360.
10
Telehealth interventions: remote monitoring and consultations for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).远程医疗干预:针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的远程监测和咨询。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 20;7(7):CD013196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013196.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Telehealth Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Call for Minimum Standards.远程医疗肺康复:呼吁制定最低标准。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Jul 15;210(2):145-146. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202402-0392VP.
2
Comparing interventions for early psychosis: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis.早期精神病干预措施的比较:一项系统评价与成分网络荟萃分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Mar 14;70:102537. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102537. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Treatable traits models of care.可治疗特征的护理模式。
Respirology. 2024 Jan;29(1):24-35. doi: 10.1111/resp.14644. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
4
Core outcome set for pulmonary rehabilitation of patients with COPD: results of a modified Delphi survey.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复的核心结局集:一项改良 Delphi 调查的结果。
Thorax. 2023 Dec;78(12):1240-1247. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2023-220522. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
5
Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Adults with Chronic Respiratory Disease: An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.慢性呼吸疾病成人的肺康复:美国胸科学会临床实践指南
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Aug 15;208(4):e7-e26. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202306-1066ST.
6
Understanding the effectiveness of different exercise training programme designs on V̇O in COPD: a component network meta-analysis.理解不同运动训练方案设计对 COPD 患者 V̇O 的效果:一个组成部分网络荟萃分析。
Thorax. 2023 Oct;78(10):1035-1038. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2023-220071. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
7
Component network meta-analysis in a nutshell.简而言之,组件网络荟萃分析。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Jun;28(3):183-186. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2021-111906. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
8
Behavioural programmes for cigarette smoking cessation: investigating interactions between behavioural, motivational and delivery components in a systematic review and component network meta-analysis.行为戒烟计划:系统评价和成分网络荟萃分析中行为、动机和实施成分之间相互作用的研究。
Addiction. 2022 Aug;117(8):2145-2156. doi: 10.1111/add.15791. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
9
Defining Modern Pulmonary Rehabilitation. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.定义现代肺康复。美国胸科学会官方研讨会报告。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 May;18(5):e12-e29. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202102-146ST.
10
Pulmonary rehabilitation at a time of social distancing: prime time for tele-rehabilitation?社交距离时期的肺康复:远程康复的黄金时期?
Thorax. 2020 Jun;75(6):446-447. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-214788. Epub 2020 May 12.