Suppr超能文献

前期影响:诺和诺德基金会资助的新形式。

Impact upfront: novel format for Novo Nordisk Foundation funding.

作者信息

Balling Gert Vilhelm, Fosse Henrik Barslund, Iversen Katrine Zander, Hanney Stephen Robert

机构信息

Impact Management, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Hellerup, Denmark.

Health Economics Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, Brunel University of London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Sep 2;23(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01385-x.

Abstract

Many retrospective assessments of the wider, societal impacts from health research funding use the Payback Framework or other frameworks. Much of this experience was collated in the 2018 Statement by the International School on Research Impact Assessment (ISRIA). Despite increased interest, especially in engaged research and a wider range of evaluation approaches, rarely do health and other research funders take a prospective approach and analyse the potential impact from a proposal to inform an impact management approach aimed at boosting impact. In this paper, experts from the Novo Nordisk Foundation, a leading philanthropic funder of research, describe how they are developing and applying such a pioneering approach. The five steps form a continuum from project inception to data collation and assessment. The first step entails preparing the project's narrative in alignment with the project's vision. The second, building the logic model, includes defining success factors and effect chains. The third is an early assessment of the initiative's potential impact, conducted on a case basis. The fourth is implementing the data model by integrating specific indicators. The fifth focuses on monitoring, impact management and creating impact products, including developing a comprehensive plan for data reporting and assessment, with scope for adjustments based on experience. This approach aligns with ISRIA guidelines, but further steps are needed. Whilst the Foundation is driving innovation in impact assessment by successfully introducing a new approach that uses prospective impact analysis to inform impact management to enhance the levels of impact achieved, further progress is needed on stakeholder engagement expanding towards a more inclusive stakeholder involvement.

摘要

许多对健康研究资金更广泛的社会影响进行的回顾性评估都采用了回报框架或其他框架。2018年国际研究影响评估学院(ISRIA)的声明整理了许多这方面的经验。尽管人们的兴趣有所增加,特别是在参与式研究和更广泛的评估方法方面,但健康和其他研究资助者很少采用前瞻性方法,分析提案的潜在影响,以形成旨在提高影响力的影响管理方法。在本文中,研究领域的主要慈善资助者诺和诺德基金会的专家描述了他们如何开发和应用这种开创性方法。这五个步骤形成了一个从项目启动到数据整理和评估的连续过程。第一步是根据项目愿景编写项目说明。第二步,构建逻辑模型,包括定义成功因素和效果链。第三步是对该倡议的潜在影响进行基于案例的早期评估。第四步是通过整合具体指标来实施数据模型。第五步侧重于监测、影响管理和创建影响产品,包括制定全面的数据报告和评估计划,并根据经验进行调整。这种方法符合ISRIA指南,但还需要进一步的步骤。虽然该基金会通过成功引入一种新方法来推动影响评估方面的创新,这种方法利用前瞻性影响分析为影响管理提供信息,以提高所实现的影响水平,但在利益相关者参与方面还需要进一步取得进展,朝着更具包容性的利益相关者参与方向发展。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验