Wu Shuang, Ma Wan-Ping, Wang Hui
Operating Theater, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Anesthesiology Department, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 29;104(35):e44000. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044000.
Anesthesia type for hip fracture surgery and its relation to postoperative delirium (POD) is a topic of ongoing debate. This study aimed to elucidate whether there is a significant difference in POD incidence, mortality, and length of hospital stay between general anesthesia (GA) and spinal anesthesia (SA).
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared the outcomes of GA and SA in hip fracture surgeries, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data was extracted from 4 databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The main outcome of interest was the incidence of POD, with secondary outcomes including length of hospital stay and mortality rate.
The initial database search yielded 1012 studies, 9 of which met inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in the incidence of POD at postoperative day 4 (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.85-1.25, P > .05) or day 7 (RR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.89-1.25, P > .05) between GA and SA groups. The mortality rate at 3 months post-surgery (RR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.69-1.50, P > .05) and total hospital stay duration (MD = -0.04, 95% CI: -0.17 to 0.08, P > .05) also did not significantly differ between the 2 groups.
Although SA has certain advantages over GA, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of postoperative delirium, mortality, and hospital stay length between the 2 methods.
髋部骨折手术的麻醉类型及其与术后谵妄(POD)的关系是一个仍在争论的话题。本研究旨在阐明全身麻醉(GA)和脊髓麻醉(SA)在POD发生率、死亡率和住院时间方面是否存在显著差异。
我们对比较GA和SA在髋部骨折手术中结局的随机对照试验进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南。数据从4个数据库中提取:PubMed、Embase、科学网和考克兰图书馆。主要关注的结局是POD的发生率,次要结局包括住院时间和死亡率。
最初的数据库搜索产生了1012项研究,其中9项符合纳入标准并被纳入荟萃分析。GA组和SA组在术后第4天(RR = 1.03,95%CI:0.85 - 1.25,P > 0.05)或第7天(RR = 1.05,95%CI:0.89 - 1.25,P > 0.05)的POD发生率没有显著差异。两组在术后3个月的死亡率(RR = 1.02,95%CI:0.69 - 1.50,P > 0.05)和总住院时间(MD = -0.04,95%CI:-0.17至0.08,P > 0.05)也没有显著差异。
虽然SA相对于GA有一定优势,但两种方法在术后谵妄发生率、死亡率和住院时间方面没有观察到显著差异。