Batista Mariana Rodrigues, Motta Andréa Rodrigues, Furlan Renata Maria Moreira Moraes
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Fonoaudiológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.
Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.
Codas. 2025 Aug 29;37(4):e20240144. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/e20240144pt. eCollection 2025.
to compare the maximum pressure, average pressure, and labial resistance of healthy adults undergoing myotherapy combined with photobiomodulation at different doses.
a randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted. The non-probabilistic sample consisted of 12 individuals with a mean age of 21.8 years, randomly assigned to three distinct groups for intervention with photobiomodulation. The exercises were the same for all participants. In group 1 (G1), participants received photobiomodulation at a dose of 7 J per point; in group 2 (G2), participants received 9 J per point; and in the placebo group (PG), participants underwent the same procedures as in the other groups, but the device was turned on without being activated (placebo). The wavelength used was infrared. Participants received photobiomodulation three times a week, with a 48-hour interval, for eight weeks. Myotherapy was performed at home by participants three times a day, five times a week, for eight weeks. Clinical assessment of the lips, maximum pressure, average pressure, and labial resistance were conducted using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) before and after intervention.
There were no results indicating an increase in maximum or average lip pressure; however, there was an increase in labial resistance in G1.
Photobiomodulation associated with myotherapy, with the parameters and methodology used in this study, did not result in an increase in lip pressure but promoted an increase in resistance in the group exposed to 7 J per point.
比较接受不同剂量光生物调节联合肌功能治疗的健康成年人的最大压力、平均压力和唇部阻力。
进行了一项随机双盲临床试验。非概率样本由12名平均年龄为21.8岁的个体组成,随机分为三个不同组接受光生物调节干预。所有参与者的锻炼方式相同。在第1组(G1)中,参与者接受每点7焦耳剂量的光生物调节;在第2组(G2)中,参与者接受每点9焦耳的剂量;在安慰剂组(PG)中,参与者接受与其他组相同的程序,但设备打开但未激活(安慰剂)。使用的波长为红外线。参与者每周接受三次光生物调节,间隔48小时,共八周。参与者在家中每天进行三次肌功能治疗,每周五次,共八周。在干预前后使用爱荷华口腔功能仪器(IOPI)对唇部、最大压力、平均压力和唇部阻力进行临床评估。
没有结果表明最大或平均唇部压力增加;然而,G1组的唇部阻力增加。
本研究中使用的参数和方法,光生物调节联合肌功能治疗并未导致唇部压力增加,但在每点接受7焦耳照射的组中促进了阻力增加。