Suppr超能文献

评估喜好驱动因素的方法比较:理想小睡法与全选法

Comparison of Methods for Evaluating Drivers of Liking for : Ideal Napping versus the Check-All-That-Apply Method.

作者信息

Jung Jiyoon, Kwak Han Sub, Kim Sangsook, Park Sung-Jin, Lee Dongju, Saleh Mohammed I, Lee Youngseung

机构信息

Samyang Foods Company Limited, Seoul 02737, Korea.

Food Processing Research Group, Korea Food Research Institute, Jeonbuk 55365, Korea.

出版信息

Prev Nutr Food Sci. 2025 Aug 31;30(4):409-418. doi: 10.3746/pnf.2025.30.4.409.

Abstract

Check-all-that-apply (CATA) and napping are cost- and time-efficient alternatives to conventional descriptive analysis for evaluating product sensory characteristics. This study introduces ideal napping as a novel sensory evaluation method that integrates the napping procedure with the concept of constructing an ideal product profile. Ideal napping was used to identify drivers of liking for 12 commercial (Korean rice wines). When comparing the product configurations generated by the multiple factor analysis between the two methods, a similar representation of product locations, including the ideal product, was observed. The ideal product was characterized by statements such as "fruit-related," "green plum-related," and "sweetness," while the "yeast-related" attributes were far from ideal according to the results of both the methods. Drivers of liking or disliking were identified by partial least squares regression for these two methods and yielded similar results, revealing the main drivers of liking to be "sweetness," "sweet aroma," "fruit flavor and aroma," "green plum flavor," "floral aroma," and "carbonic mouthfeel," while the main drivers of disliking were "acridity," "bitterness," "yeast flavor and aroma," and "mushroom flavor and aroma." Ideal napping was able to provide additional insights into the consumer perception of ideal products with performance similar to CATA. The findings offer practical insights for liquor product development and reformulation. By identifying sensory attributes that influence consumer preferences, manufacturers can better align products with market expectations. Additionally, comparing ideal napping with CATA provides valuable guidance for improving consumer satisfaction with traditional beverages such as .

摘要

多选式(CATA)和小组讨论是评估产品感官特性的成本效益高且节省时间的传统描述性分析替代方法。本研究引入理想小组讨论作为一种新颖的感官评估方法,该方法将小组讨论程序与构建理想产品轮廓的概念相结合。理想小组讨论用于确定12种市售韩国米酒的喜好驱动因素。在比较两种方法通过多因素分析生成的产品配置时,观察到包括理想产品在内的产品位置呈现出相似的分布。理想产品的特征描述包括“与水果相关”、“与青梅相关”和“甜度”,而根据两种方法的结果,“与酵母相关”属性都远非理想。通过偏最小二乘回归确定了这两种方法中喜欢或不喜欢的驱动因素,结果相似,表明喜欢的主要驱动因素是“甜度”、“甜香”、“水果风味和香气”、“青梅风味”、“花香香气”和“碳酸口感”,而不喜欢的主要驱动因素是“辛辣味”、“苦味”、“酵母风味和香气”以及“蘑菇风味和香气”。理想小组讨论能够在消费者对理想产品的认知方面提供额外见解,其表现与CATA相似。这些发现为酒类产品开发和重新配方提供了实际见解。通过识别影响消费者偏好的感官属性制造商可以使产品更好地符合市场期望此外将理想小组讨论与CATA进行比较为提高消费者对传统饮品等的满意度提供了有价值的指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1f/12399908/213610c68210/pnfs-30-4-409-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验