Suppr超能文献

年龄、肌酐和射血分数(ACEF)评分与PCI患者抑郁和焦虑症状的存在相关。

Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction (ACEF) Score is Associated with the Presence of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in PCI Patients.

作者信息

Zhou Qiping, Liu Qifan, Yan Hui, Li Yunyao, Abudureyimu Ayipali, Guo Shanshan, Tian Dan, Wang Guipeng, Huang Bing

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, People's Republic of China.

Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2025 Aug 28;21:1831-1843. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S515833. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A significant proportion of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have or develop comorbid depression and/or anxiety symptoms, which are associated with adverse events. The age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score is a good predictor for the prognostic assessment of certain cardiac diseases. But it has never been used to predict post-PCI depression and anxiety symptoms.

AIM

To evaluate the possible association among ACEF score at admission, post-PCI anxiety, depression, comorbid anxiety and depression symptoms in hospital.

METHODS

After exclusion, a total of 222 patients undergoing emergency or selective PCI were enrolled and completed Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to measure anxiety and depression symptoms before discharging. Patients were divided into four groups according to HADS score (anxiety, depression, comorbid anxiety and depression, neither anxiety nor depression). Logistic regression, linear regression and smoothed curve fitting (based on the penalized spline method) were used to analyze the relationship between ACEF score and post-PCI anxiety, depression symptoms. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to assess the value of ACEF score for predicting post-PCI anxiety, depression, comorbid anxiety and depression symptoms and to determine its critical values.

RESULTS

Of the sample, the number of patients who were diagnosed with post-PCI anxiety, depression and comorbid anxiety and depression symptoms were 16 (7.2%), 33 (14.9%) and 37 (16.7%), which increased with the ACEF score quartiles. In multivariate-adjusted logistic regression analysis, the odds ratios (ORs) of post-PCI anxiety, depression symptoms were 7.701 (1.613-36.766), 6.173 (1.608-28.028) for the lowest quartile of ACEF score compared with the highest quartile. Multivariate-adjusted linear regression and smoothed curve fitting analysis demonstrated that post-PCI anxiety and depression scores increased with higher ACEF scores, indicating a nonlinear positive correlation. The ROC curve showed that ACEF score was a good predictor for post-PCI anxiety, depression and comorbid anxiety and depression symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Higher ACEF score is positively correlated with the prevalences of anxiety and depression symptoms after PCI in hospital, suggesting that ACEF score can be a valid predictor of depression and anxiety symptoms.

摘要

背景

相当一部分经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的患者患有或出现共病性抑郁和/或焦虑症状,这些症状与不良事件相关。年龄、肌酐和射血分数(ACEF)评分是某些心脏病预后评估的良好预测指标。但它从未被用于预测PCI后的抑郁和焦虑症状。

目的

评估入院时的ACEF评分与PCI后焦虑、抑郁、共病性焦虑和抑郁症状在医院中的可能关联。

方法

排除后,共纳入222例接受急诊或选择性PCI的患者,并在出院前完成医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)以测量焦虑和抑郁症状。根据HADS评分将患者分为四组(焦虑、抑郁、共病性焦虑和抑郁、既无焦虑也无抑郁)。采用逻辑回归、线性回归和平滑曲线拟合(基于惩罚样条法)分析ACEF评分与PCI后焦虑、抑郁症状之间的关系。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析以评估ACEF评分对预测PCI后焦虑、抑郁、共病性焦虑和抑郁症状的价值,并确定其临界值。

结果

在样本中,被诊断为PCI后焦虑、抑郁和共病性焦虑和抑郁症状的患者数量分别为16例(7.2%)、33例(14.9%)和37例(16.7%),且随着ACEF评分四分位数的增加而增加。在多变量调整逻辑回归分析中,与最高四分位数相比,ACEF评分最低四分位数的PCI后焦虑、抑郁症状的优势比(OR)分别为7.701(1.613 - 36.766)、6.173(1.608 - 28.028)。多变量调整线性回归和平滑曲线拟合分析表明,PCI后焦虑和抑郁评分随着ACEF评分升高而增加,表明存在非线性正相关。ROC曲线显示,ACEF评分是PCI后焦虑、抑郁和共病性焦虑和抑郁症状的良好预测指标。

结论

较高的ACEF评分与医院中PCI后焦虑和抑郁症状的患病率呈正相关,表明ACEF评分可以作为抑郁和焦虑症状的有效预测指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a67/12402421/bf61ef4d136b/NDT-21-1831-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验