• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丙泊酚-氯胺酮与丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼用于儿童胃镜检查麻醉的比较

Comparison of propofol-ketamine versuspropofol-remifentanil in children anaesthetized for gastroscopy.

作者信息

Damps Maria, Stołtny Ludwik, Siemek-Mitela Jadwiga, Lekstan Andrzej, Krzych Łukasz, Kucewicz-Czech Ewa

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Upper Silesian Child Health Centre, Katowice, Poland.

Department of Surgery, Vascular Surgery and Transplantation, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

出版信息

Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2019;51(4):262-267. doi: 10.5114/ait.2019.88185.

DOI:10.5114/ait.2019.88185
PMID:31550872
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The search for ideal anaesthesia is still an open research issue. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare two methods of general anaesthesia with preserved own breath - propofol with ketamine and propofol with remifentanil - in children anaesthetized for gastroscopy.

METHODS

The study included 90 children enrolled for elective endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract under general anaesthesia. The patients were randomized to one of two groups: Group K consisted of children anesthetized with propofol and ketamine, Group R included children anesthetized with propofol and remifentanil. Parameters monitored during anaesthesia were induction time, respiratory and circulatory parameters, adverse events, waking time and the child's condition after regaining consciousness.

RESULTS

The groups differed significantly in time of induction of anaesthesia (Group K 3 ± 1 min vs. Group R 4 ± 2.5 min; P < 0.001), waking time (Group R 4 ± 4.5 min vs. Group K 6 ± 5 min; P < 0.01), condition of the child after regaining consciousness (Group R 90.9% calm, Group of K 54% confused; P < 0.001) and evaluation of test conditions in the opinion of the gastroenterologist (in favour of Group K; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both methods of anaesthesia presented in the paper are safe and can be used in children to perform endoscopy. Combining propofol with ketamine allows fast induction of anaesthesia and creates very good conditions for the examination. Combining propofol with remifentanil allows fast and full return of consciousness after anaesthesia.

摘要

背景

寻找理想的麻醉方法仍是一个开放的研究课题。本研究的目的是评估和比较两种保留自主呼吸的全身麻醉方法——丙泊酚联合氯胺酮和丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼——用于接受胃镜检查麻醉的儿童。

方法

本研究纳入了90名接受全身麻醉下择期上消化道内镜检查的儿童。患者被随机分为两组:K组由接受丙泊酚和氯胺酮麻醉的儿童组成,R组包括接受丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼麻醉的儿童。麻醉期间监测的参数包括诱导时间、呼吸和循环参数、不良事件、苏醒时间以及患儿苏醒后的状况。

结果

两组在麻醉诱导时间(K组3±1分钟 vs. R组4±2.5分钟;P<0.001)、苏醒时间(R组4±4.5分钟 vs. K组6±5分钟;P<0.01)、患儿苏醒后的状况(R组90.9%平静,K组54%神志不清;P<0.001)以及胃肠病学家对检查条件的评价(有利于K组;P<0.05)方面存在显著差异。

结论

本文介绍的两种麻醉方法都是安全的,可用于儿童进行内镜检查。丙泊酚联合氯胺酮可实现快速麻醉诱导,并为检查创造非常好的条件。丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼可使麻醉后意识快速且完全恢复。

相似文献

1
Comparison of propofol-ketamine versuspropofol-remifentanil in children anaesthetized for gastroscopy.丙泊酚-氯胺酮与丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼用于儿童胃镜检查麻醉的比较
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2019;51(4):262-267. doi: 10.5114/ait.2019.88185.
2
Comparison of propofol-remifentanil versus propofol-ketamine deep sedation for third molar surgery.丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼与丙泊酚-氯胺酮深度镇静用于第三磨牙手术的比较。
Anesth Prog. 2012 Fall;59(3):107-17. doi: 10.2344/12-00001.1.
3
The Effect of Low-Dose Intraoperative Ketamine on Closed-Loop-Controlled General Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Equivalence Trial.小剂量氯胺酮对闭环控制全身麻醉的影响:一项随机对照等效试验。
Anesth Analg. 2021 Nov 1;133(5):1215-1224. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005372.
4
Determination of the median effective dose of propofol in combination with different doses of ketamine during gastro-duodenoscopy in children: a randomised controlled trial.在儿童胃镜检查中,联合使用不同剂量氯胺酮时丙泊酚的半数有效剂量的测定:一项随机对照试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Aug;121(2):453-461. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.03.037. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
5
Comparison of ketamine-propofol and remifentanil in terms of hemodynamic variables and patient satisfaction during monitored anaesthesia care.在麻醉监测护理期间,比较氯胺酮-丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼在血流动力学变量及患者满意度方面的差异。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2016;48(2):116-21. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2016.0019. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
6
Remifentanil-based total intravenous anesthesia for pediatric rigid bronchoscopy: comparison of adjuvant propofol and ketamine.基于瑞芬太尼的小儿硬质支气管镜检查全静脉麻醉:丙泊酚与氯胺酮辅助效果比较
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014 Jun;69(6):372-7. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2014(06)01.
7
Propofol versus propofol/ketamine for brief painful procedures in the emergency department: clinical and bispectral index scale comparison.丙泊酚与丙泊酚/氯胺酮用于急诊科简短疼痛操作的比较:临床与脑电双频指数比较
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2010 Dec;24(4):349-55. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2010.506503.
8
Intravenous remifentanil and propofol for gastroscopy.静脉注射瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚用于胃镜检查。
J Clin Anesth. 2008 Aug;20(5):352-355. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.03.006.
9
Medetomidine-ketamine anaesthesia induction followed by medetomidine-propofol in ponies: infusion rates and cardiopulmonary side effects.小马驹中先采用美托咪定-氯胺酮诱导麻醉,随后使用美托咪定-丙泊酚:输注速率及心肺副作用
Equine Vet J. 2003 May;35(3):308-13. doi: 10.2746/042516403776148354.
10
Efficacy of ketamine and midazolam as co-induction agents with propofol for laryngeal mask insertion in children.氯胺酮与咪达唑仑作为丙泊酚的联合诱导剂用于儿童喉罩置入的疗效。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Jul;18(7):628-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02563.x. Epub 2008 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A comprehensive systematic review of randomized controlled trials on anesthetic agents in children's upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: highlighting safety concerns and efficacy.儿童上消化道内镜检查中麻醉剂的随机对照试验综合系统评价:突出安全性问题和疗效
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s00210-025-04557-2.
2
ED50 of ciprofol combined with different doses of remifentanil during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in school-aged children: a prospective dose-finding study using an up-and-down sequential allocation method.学龄儿童上消化道内镜检查期间丙泊酚联合不同剂量瑞芬太尼的半数有效剂量:一项采用序贯法的前瞻性剂量探索研究
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Oct 11;15:1386129. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1386129. eCollection 2024.
3
Assessing pediatric anesthesia outcomes and prognostic factors: a comparative study of ketamine vs. ketamine + propofol.评估小儿麻醉效果及预后因素:氯胺酮与氯胺酮+丙泊酚的对比研究
Am J Transl Res. 2023 Oct 15;15(10):6095-6105. eCollection 2023.
4
Comparison of propofol-esketamine versus propofol for anesthesia in gastroscopy: a double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial.丙泊酚-艾司氯胺酮与丙泊酚用于胃镜检查麻醉的比较:一项双盲、随机对照临床试验。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 8;10:1184709. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1184709. eCollection 2023.
5
Advances in Analgosedation and Periprocedural Care for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.胃肠内镜检查的镇痛镇静及围手术期护理进展
Life (Basel). 2023 Feb 8;13(2):473. doi: 10.3390/life13020473.
6
A comparison of ketamine-midazolam combination and propofol-fentanyl combination on procedure comfort and recovery process in pediatric colonoscopy procedures.氯胺酮-咪达唑仑组合与丙泊酚-芬太尼组合在小儿结肠镜检查术中的舒适度及恢复过程比较。
Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Mar-Apr;37(2):483-488. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.2.2787.