Suppr超能文献

作为邻居的营地:华盛顿州西雅图市无家可归者群体的营地位置及与便利设施的距离

Encampments as neighbors: Encampment location and proximity to amenities among Seattle, WA's unhoused population.

作者信息

Sutton Aja, Walker Whitney, Hagopian Amy, Almquist Zack W

机构信息

Department of Environmental Social Sciences, Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability, Stanford University, Yang & Yamazaki (Y2E2) Building, 473 Via Ortega, Room 350, Stanford, CA, USA 94305.

Evergreen Treatment Services REACH, 2133 3rd Ave., Suite 116, Seattle, WA, USA, 98121.

出版信息

Cities. 2026 Jan;168. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2025.106348. Epub 2025 Aug 27.

Abstract

In the United States, no jurisdiction guarantees the basic conditions necessary for health, such as stable housing, even as homelessness continues to intensify. King County, Washington, the twelfth largest U.S. county, hosts the fourth largest population of people experiencing homelessness, many of whom reside in Seattle. Discouraging encampments and providing shelter beds has proven ineffective. We investigate how encampments' proximity to basic amenities compares to those in emergency shelters and rental units. We analyze rich spatial, administrative, and outreach worker data from Seattle's Evergreen Treatment Services (ETS) REACH on individuals living in tents and on the street from 2016 to 2022. We discuss the implications of providing effective support for people living unhoused and provide, to our knowledge, the most comprehensive and recent study of neighborhood amenities proximity among the unsheltered population in Seattle, WA. We find that, in most neighborhoods, encampment locations were similarly located in proximity to a range of amenities as were rental units. Additionally, encampments were located closer than shelters to certain amenities, especially food-related ones, excluding food banks, suggesting that they may offer opportunities for meeting basic needs, and accessing WiFi. We conclude that housing options that feel like homes rather than institutions are crucial in supporting the unhoused population. Our findings suggest that emergency shelters should be more integrated into neighborhoods and better reflect the proximity to amenities of tent encampments and rentals.

摘要

在美国,即使无家可归的情况持续加剧,也没有哪个司法管辖区能保障健康所需的基本条件,比如稳定的住房。华盛顿州的金县是美国第十二大县,无家可归者数量位居全国第四,其中许多人居住在西雅图。事实证明,阻止搭建帐篷营地和提供庇护床位的做法并不奏效。我们调查了帐篷营地与基本便利设施的距离,并将其与紧急避难所和出租单元的情况进行比较。我们分析了西雅图常青治疗服务(ETS)机构“拓展计划”(REACH)提供的丰富空间、行政和外展工作者数据,这些数据涉及2016年至2022年期间居住在帐篷里和街头的个人。我们讨论了为无家可归者提供有效支持的意义,并据我们所知,对华盛顿州西雅图市无庇护人群附近社区便利设施进行了最全面和最新的研究。我们发现,在大多数社区,帐篷营地的位置与一系列便利设施的距离和出租单元类似。此外,帐篷营地比避难所更靠近某些便利设施,尤其是与食物相关的设施(不包括食品银行),这表明帐篷营地可能提供满足基本需求和使用无线网络的机会。我们得出结论,让人感觉像家而不是机构的住房选择对于支持无家可归人群至关重要。我们的研究结果表明,紧急避难所应更好地融入社区,并更接近帐篷营地和出租单元附近便利设施的情况。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
Unsheltered Homelessness and Health: A Literature Review.无家可归者的露宿与健康:文献综述
AJPM Focus. 2022 Oct 29;2(1):100043. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2022.100043. eCollection 2023 Mar.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验