Suppr超能文献

多发性硬化症的复发与否:疾病活动生物标志物能否为临床医生提供帮助?

Relapse or no relapse in multiple sclerosis: Can disease activity biomarkers support the clinician?

作者信息

van Pamelen Jeske, Koel-Simmelink Marleen J A, Lissenberg Birgit I, Arnoldus Edo P J, de Beukelaar Janet, van Vliet Judith, Killestein Joep, Teunissen Charlotte E, Visser Leo H

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2025 Sep 2;11(3):20552173251370830. doi: 10.1177/20552173251370830. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), the assessment of clinical disease activity can be challenging.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic potential of serum neurofilament light (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) to distinguish a relapse from other causes of deterioration.

METHODS

In this multicenter, prospective study, RRMS patients with new neurological symptoms in the last 14 days were followed for 12 weeks. A diagnosis was established by the treating physician or, when in doubt, a panel of experienced neurologists. Blood samples were taken at baseline and week 12.

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients were included. At baseline, patients with a clear relapse had a significantly higher median sNfL (14.6 pg/mL) than those with a clear other cause (9.5 pg/mL,  = 0.004). Although not significant after correction for multiple testing, median sGFAP was also higher in relapse patients (73.0 vs 64.6 pg/mL,  = 0.036). An sNfL value below 6.0 pg/mL had a high sensitivity (67% at baseline (CI 22.3-95.7%) and 100% at follow-up (CI 54.1-100%)) to rule out a relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of sNfL level can be useful as an add-on investigation to determine whether disease activity is present in patients with RRMS presenting with new symptoms.

摘要

背景

在复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)中,临床疾病活动度的评估可能具有挑战性。

目的

确定血清神经丝轻链(sNfL)和胶质纤维酸性蛋白(sGFAP)区分复发与其他恶化原因的诊断潜力。

方法

在这项多中心前瞻性研究中,对过去14天出现新神经症状的RRMS患者进行了12周的随访。由主治医生进行诊断,如有疑问,则由一组经验丰富的神经科医生进行诊断。在基线和第12周采集血样。

结果

共纳入65例患者。在基线时,明确复发的患者中位sNfL(14.6 pg/mL)显著高于明确由其他原因导致恶化的患者(9.5 pg/mL,P = 0.004)。尽管在多重检验校正后不显著,但复发患者的中位sGFAP也更高(73.0 vs 64.6 pg/mL,P = 0.036)。sNfL值低于6.0 pg/mL对排除复发具有较高的敏感性(基线时为67%(CI 22.3 - 95.7%),随访时为100%(CI 54.1 - 100%))。

结论

分析sNfL水平作为一项补充检查,对于确定出现新症状的RRMS患者是否存在疾病活动可能有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a113/12405697/9b557ff768b9/10.1177_20552173251370830-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验