• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国的保险政策与主粮作物种植结构调整:对粮食系统韧性与安全的影响

Insurance policy and cropping structure adjustment toward staple grains in China: implications for food system resilience and security.

作者信息

Wang Jiawei, Yuan Zihui, Wu Zhihua, Kuang Xia, Ye Feng

机构信息

School of Economics, Management and Law, Jiangxi Normal University of Science and Technology, Nanchang, China.

Digital Faculty of Economics, Jiangxi Open University, Nanchang, China.

出版信息

Front Nutr. 2025 Aug 20;12:1636296. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1636296. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fnut.2025.1636296
PMID:40909890
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12405428/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The ongoing decline in staple crop acreage and the accelerating trend of "non-grain" cultivation pose structural risks to China's food security. Agricultural insurance, beyond its traditional role in risk mitigation, may serve as a structural policy tool to influence farmers' planting decisions and guide cropping structures toward staple grains. However, empirical evidence on this guiding function remains limited.

METHODS

Drawing on data from the 2020 China Rural Revitalization Survey (CRRS), this study employs a two-limit Tobit model to examine the impact pathways and moderating mechanisms through which agricultural insurance affects farmers' cropping structure adjustment. The analysis addresses endogeneity issues and explores heterogeneous effects across different farmer groups.

RESULTS

Agricultural insurance significantly increases the proportion of staple crops in total cultivated area, with findings robust to both robustness checks and endogeneity tests. Mechanism analysis shows that digital technology training significantly strengthens the incentive effect by improving farmers' ability to access and interpret policy information. The marginal effect also rises with greater distance from the administrative center, indicating higher responsiveness in institutionally underserved areas. Heterogeneity analysis reveals stronger effects among highly educated farmers, small-scale operators, residents in pilot regions, those in non-plain terrains, and farmers in eastern provinces.

DISCUSSION

These results confirm the effectiveness of agricultural insurance as a policy instrument for guiding cropping structure adjustments. Strengthening policy communication, expanding service coverage-especially in remote areas-and improving coverage levels can further enhance its contribution to national food security strategies and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

摘要

引言

主要农作物种植面积持续下降以及“非粮化”种植加速的趋势,给中国粮食安全带来了结构性风险。农业保险除了在风险缓解方面发挥传统作用外,还可作为一种结构性政策工具,影响农民的种植决策,并引导种植结构向主粮倾斜。然而,关于这一引导功能的实证证据仍然有限。

方法

本研究利用2020年中国农村振兴调查(CRRS)的数据,采用双限托宾模型来检验农业保险影响农民种植结构调整的影响路径和调节机制。该分析解决了内生性问题,并探讨了不同农民群体的异质性影响。

结果

农业保险显著提高了主粮作物在总种植面积中的比例,稳健性检验和内生性检验的结果均支持这一发现。机制分析表明,数字技术培训通过提高农民获取和解读政策信息的能力,显著增强了激励效果。边际效应也随着与行政中心距离的增加而上升,表明在制度服务不足的地区反应更为灵敏。异质性分析显示,在受教育程度高的农民、小规模经营者、试点地区居民、非平原地区居民以及东部省份的农民中,影响更为显著。

讨论

这些结果证实了农业保险作为引导种植结构调整的政策工具的有效性。加强政策沟通、扩大服务覆盖范围(特别是在偏远地区)以及提高覆盖水平,可以进一步增强其对国家粮食安全战略和可持续发展目标(SDGs)的贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea59/12405428/5523d63d5e89/fnut-12-1636296-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea59/12405428/3a98393bec1d/fnut-12-1636296-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea59/12405428/0d002b5798b0/fnut-12-1636296-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea59/12405428/5523d63d5e89/fnut-12-1636296-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea59/12405428/3a98393bec1d/fnut-12-1636296-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea59/12405428/0d002b5798b0/fnut-12-1636296-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea59/12405428/5523d63d5e89/fnut-12-1636296-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Insurance policy and cropping structure adjustment toward staple grains in China: implications for food system resilience and security.中国的保险政策与主粮作物种植结构调整:对粮食系统韧性与安全的影响
Front Nutr. 2025 Aug 20;12:1636296. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1636296. eCollection 2025.
2
Historical carbon emissions and future mitigation potentials from staple food cropping systems in China.中国主要粮食种植系统的历史碳排放及未来减排潜力
J Environ Manage. 2025 Aug;389:126090. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126090. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
[Spatial-temporal Differentiation Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Cultivated Land NPP in Major Grain Producing Areas (Henan Province)].[主要粮食产区(河南省)耕地净初级生产力的时空分异特征及影响因素]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3632-3644. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202406053.
5
From sole crops to strip cropping: Decision rules of frontrunner farmers in The Netherlands.从单一作物种植到带状种植:荷兰领先农民的决策规则。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 24;20(7):e0329133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329133. eCollection 2025.
6
Investigation and analysis of mental health status of the older adult in western rural areas.西部农村地区老年人心理健康状况的调查与分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 16;13:1612600. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612600. eCollection 2025.
7
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
8
Impacts of agritech on sustainable agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa: a quantile regression approach towards SDG 2.4.农业科技对撒哈拉以南非洲可持续农业的影响:实现可持续发展目标2.4的分位数回归方法
Carbon Balance Manag. 2025 Aug 23;20(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13021-025-00313-4.
9
Improving Energy Access, Climate and Socio-Economic Outcomes Through Off-Grid Electrification Technologies: A Systematic Review.通过离网电气化技术改善能源获取、气候和社会经济成果:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 15;21(3):e70060. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70060. eCollection 2025 Sep.
10
Soil carbon storage or sustainable conservation agriculture practices-Which should be our goal?土壤碳储存还是可持续保护性农业实践——我们的目标应该是什么?
J Environ Qual. 2025 Aug 26. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.70073.

本文引用的文献

1
A qualitative study of rural healthcare providers' views of social, cultural, and programmatic barriers to healthcare access.一项关于农村医疗服务提供者对医疗服务获取的社会、文化和项目障碍的看法的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 2;22(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07829-2.
2
Will land circulation sway "grain orientation"? The impact of rural land circulation on farmers' agricultural planting structures.土地流转是否会“摇摆不定”?农村土地流转对农户农业种植结构的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 24;16(6):e0253158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253158. eCollection 2021.
3
Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers.
与数以百万计的小农一起追求可持续生产力。
Nature. 2018 Mar 15;555(7696):363-366. doi: 10.1038/nature25785. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
4
Barriers to Household Risk Management: Evidence from India.家庭风险管理的障碍:来自印度的证据。
Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2013 Jan 1;5(1):104-135. doi: 10.1257/app.5.1.104.