Suppr超能文献

关于公众和患者参与儿童、青少年及家庭健康与社会护理研究的科学现状的伞状综述方案。

Protocol for an umbrella review of the state-of-science on public and patient involvement in health and social care research with children, young people and families.

作者信息

Malone Gill Shauna, Hayes Orla, Corcoran Yvonne, Gunning Anna, Swallow Veronica, Nicholson Emma, Nafria Escalera Begonya, Drury Amanda, Murphy Edel, Templeman-Lilley Arthur, Lambert Veronica

机构信息

School of Nursing, Psychotherapy and Community Health, Faculty of Science and Health, Dublin City University - Glasnevin Campus, Glasnevin, County Dublin, D09 V209, Ireland.

PPI Ignite Network @ DCU, Dublin City University - Glasnevin Campus, Glasnevin, County Dublin, D09 V209, Ireland.

出版信息

HRB Open Res. 2025 Jul 14;8:78. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.14142.1. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) refers to the active collaboration of patients and the public in health and social care research decision-making, enhancing research success, cost-effectiveness, and impact. Children, young people, and their families bring unique lived experiences to PPI in research, relating to others with similar experiences, while factors like age, cognitive maturation, and developmental stage create differences between researchers and patients or the public. Collaboration with children, young people, and their families should be guided by specific project context and a strong evidence base. However, existing systematic reviews reveal inconsistencies in reporting and a lack of standardised methods for these groups, limiting effective PPI implementation. This protocol details methods for an umbrella review to identify the current state-of-science and future priorities for collaborating with children, young people and families in health and social care research.

METHODS

The protocol was developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines, which will also direct the reporting of findings. The Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology for conducting umbrella reviews will be adhered to throughout. MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane, DARE, JBI Evidence Synthesis, PROSPERO, grey literature databases, targeted international networks, and the Google search engine will be searched for systematic reviews on PPI with children, young people, and families in health and social care research. Two reviewers will independently conduct eligibility screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal.

CONCLUSIONS

This umbrella review will provide critical insights into the state-of-science of PPI with children, young people and families in health and social care research. The synthesis of findings could yield important information for researchers and other stakeholders conducting health and social care research in collaboration with children, young people and families by highlighting key patterns, gaps, and recommendations to guide future PPI practices, policies, and research.

REGISTRATION

This umbrella review was registered in PROSPERO, the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (Prospero registration number: CRD42024608935, registered 14th of November 2024).

摘要

背景

公众和患者参与(PPI)是指患者和公众积极参与卫生和社会护理研究决策,提高研究成功率、成本效益和影响力。儿童、青少年及其家庭在研究中的PPI带来了独特的生活经历,与有类似经历的其他人建立联系,而年龄、认知成熟度和发育阶段等因素造成了研究人员与患者或公众之间的差异。与儿童、青少年及其家庭的合作应以特定项目背景和有力的证据基础为指导。然而,现有的系统评价显示,这些群体在报告方面存在不一致,且缺乏标准化方法,限制了PPI的有效实施。本方案详细介绍了一项伞状评价的方法,以确定在卫生和社会护理研究中与儿童、青少年及其家庭合作的当前科学现状和未来优先事项。

方法

本方案是根据系统评价和Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)指南制定的,该指南也将指导研究结果的报告。将始终遵循乔安娜·布里格斯研究所进行伞状评价的方法。将检索MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、PsycINFO、Cochrane、DARE、JBI证据综合、PROSPERO、灰色文献数据库、目标国际网络和谷歌搜索引擎,以查找关于卫生和社会护理研究中与儿童、青少年及其家庭的PPI的系统评价。两名评审员将独立进行资格筛选、数据提取和质量评估。

结论

这项伞状评价将提供对卫生和社会护理研究中与儿童、青少年及其家庭的PPI的科学现状的关键见解。研究结果的综合分析可以为与儿童、青少年及其家庭合作开展卫生和社会护理研究的研究人员和其他利益相关者提供重要信息,突出关键模式、差距和建议,以指导未来的PPI实践、政策和研究。

注册

这项伞状评价已在国际系统评价前瞻性注册库PROSPERO中注册(PROSPERO注册号:CRD四月二十日二零二四六千零八十九35,于2024年11月14日注册)。

相似文献

2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
The experiences of midwives and nurses collaborating to provide birthing care: a systematic review.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):74-127. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2444.
6
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
9
Medication administration in aged care facilities: A mixed-methods systematic review.
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Feb;81(2):621-640. doi: 10.1111/jan.16318. Epub 2024 Jul 7.
10
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

本文引用的文献

3
Positive Impacts of Adolescent Involvement in Health Research: An Umbrella Review.
J Adolesc Health. 2024 Aug;75(2):218-230. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.02.029. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
4
Systematic Review: Patient and Public Involvement of Children and Young People in Mental Health Research.
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2024 Mar;27(1):257-274. doi: 10.1007/s10567-024-00470-x. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
7
8
10
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
PLoS Med. 2021 Mar 29;18(3):e1003583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583. eCollection 2021 Mar.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验