Stitzer M L, Bigelow G E
Addict Behav. 1985;10(4):345-9. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(85)90030-9.
This study determined the effects on smoking behavior of providing contingent reinforcement for nonsmoking versus reduced smoking afternoon breath carbon monoxide (CO) target levels. Twenty-eight hired chronic smoker volunteers were randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions during a 10-day intervention: (a) 8 ppm target CO, $5 per day incentive (n = 11); (b) 16 ppm target CO, $4 per day incentive (n = 8); or (c) 8 ppm target CO, no incentive (n = 9). Both payment groups showed significantly lower CO levels and greater amounts of daytime smoking reduction than the no-pay group. A specific effect of CO target was also seen; 45% of subjects in the 8 ppm group compared with 0% of subjects in the 16 ppm target and no-pay groups produced average afternoon CO levels of 8.5 ppm or lower during the intervention. Average levels of CO and smoking reduction did not differ for the two paid groups, however, because some subjects in the 8 ppm group failed to reduce CO sufficiently to contact the reinforcer. Contingent reinforcement based on expired air CO levels can exercise powerful and precise (target-specific) control over smoking behavior, but there may be individual differences in ability to meet reinforcement contingencies if difficult targets are introduced abruptly.
本研究确定了针对非吸烟与减少吸烟的下午呼出一氧化碳(CO)目标水平提供偶然强化对吸烟行为的影响。28名受雇的慢性吸烟者志愿者在为期10天的干预期间被随机分配到三种实验条件之一:(a)目标CO为8 ppm,每天奖励5美元(n = 11);(b)目标CO为16 ppm,每天奖励4美元(n = 8);或(c)目标CO为8 ppm,无奖励(n = 9)。两个有报酬组的CO水平均显著低于无报酬组,且白天吸烟减少量更多。还观察到了CO目标的特定效应;在干预期间,8 ppm组中45%的受试者与16 ppm目标组和无报酬组中0%的受试者相比,下午平均CO水平达到或低于8.5 ppm。然而,两个有报酬组的CO平均水平和吸烟减少量没有差异,因为8 ppm组中的一些受试者未能充分降低CO水平以获得强化物。基于呼出气体CO水平的偶然强化可以对吸烟行为进行有力且精确(目标特异性)的控制,但如果突然引入困难的目标,在满足强化条件的能力方面可能存在个体差异。