Stitzer M L, Rand C S, Bigelow G E, Mead A M
J Appl Behav Anal. 1986 Summer;19(2):197-202. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-197.
We assessed the ability of a combined contingent reinforcement and intensive monitoring procedure to promote and sustain temporary smoking cessation among 34 hired research volunteers, and the ability of a smoking reduction test to predict the subsequent initiation of abstinence. During the 5-day cutdown test, subjects were paid from $0 to $6 per day depending on the extent of reduction from baseline CO levels. During the abstinence test, breath samples were obtained three times daily and subjects were paid $4 for each CO reading less than or equal to 11 ppm. Sixty-eight percent of subjects initiated abstinence. Of the breath samples collected during the abstinence test (91% of scheduled samples), 96.5% were less than or equal to 11 ppm and 80.5% were less than or equal to 8 ppm. Subjects who earned more money during the cutdown test were more likely to abstain (r = -0.51, p less than .001). Contingent reinforcement and intensive monitoring procedures appear to have usefulness for analog studies of smoking reduction and cessation.
我们评估了联合的偶然强化和强化监测程序在34名受雇的研究志愿者中促进并维持临时戒烟的能力,以及减少吸烟测试预测随后戒断开始的能力。在为期5天的减少吸烟测试期间,根据与基线一氧化碳水平相比减少的程度,每天向受试者支付0至6美元。在戒断测试期间,每天采集三次呼吸样本,每次一氧化碳读数小于或等于11 ppm,受试者可获得4美元报酬。68%的受试者开始戒断。在戒断测试期间采集的呼吸样本(占计划样本的91%)中,96.5%小于或等于11 ppm,80.5%小于或等于8 ppm。在减少吸烟测试中赚得更多钱的受试者更有可能戒烟(r = -0.51,p小于0.001)。偶然强化和强化监测程序似乎对减少吸烟和戒烟的模拟研究有用。