Suppr超能文献

塞来昔布治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疾病安全性的现有证据:一项系统综述。

Current Evidence on Celecoxib Safety in the Management of Chronic Musculoskeletal Conditions: An Umbrella Review.

作者信息

Beaudart Charlotte, Brabant Christian, Alokail Majed, Reginster Jean-Yves, Bruyère Olivier

机构信息

Public Health Aging Research & Epidemiology (PHARE) Group, Research Unit in Clinical, Pharmacology and Toxicology (URPC), NAmur Research Institute for LIfe Sciences (NARILIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.

Research Unit in Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.

出版信息

Drugs. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1007/s40265-025-02234-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to systematically synthesize and evaluate the existing evidence from meta-syntheses (systematic reviews and meta-analyses) reporting on the safety of celecoxib in adults with chronic musculoskeletal disorders.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search in November 2024 across MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, and Scopus databases, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines for umbrella reviews. Only systematic reviews and meta-analyses involving celecoxib safety in osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis were included. We assessed the risk of bias using the AMSTAR-2 tool and graded the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

RESULTS

Of 2294 retrieved records, 16 systematic reviews based on randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria (14 of 16 were rated as critically low quality). Celecoxib was consistently associated with a lower risk of gastroduodenal ulcers than were non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and some studies also reported fewer gastrointestinal complaints and serious events with celecoxib than with non-selective NSAIDs. Cardiovascular safety outcomes were generally similar to those with non-selective NSAIDs, although one meta-analysis showed a lower risk of cardiovascular mortality with celecoxib. Compared with placebo or non-selective NSAIDs, celecoxib did not increase the risk of renal dysfunction or elevated creatinine and may be associated with fewer renal adverse events. Evidence on all-cause mortality was limited and inconsistent, but one study suggested a lower risk than with non-selective NSAIDs.

CONCLUSIONS

Celecoxib appears to offer better gastrointestinal safety than non-selective NSAIDs. Although data on cardiovascular, renal, and mortality outcomes suggest possible advantages, the evidence remains limited and of low certainty. Moreover, some real-world evidence raises concerns in specific high-risk populations. Future research should integrate data from both randomized trials and observational studies to better inform long-term safety assessments and guide individualized treatment decisions.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是系统地综合和评估来自荟萃综合分析(系统评价和荟萃分析)的现有证据,这些分析报告了塞来昔布在患有慢性肌肉骨骼疾病的成年人中的安全性。

方法

我们于2024年11月按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目2020年伞状评价指南,在MEDLINE、Cochrane Central和Scopus数据库中进行了全面的文献检索。仅纳入涉及塞来昔布在骨关节炎、类风湿关节炎或强直性脊柱炎中安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。我们使用AMSTAR-2工具评估偏倚风险,并使用GRADE对证据的确定性进行分级。

结果

在检索到的2294条记录中,16项基于随机对照试验的系统评价符合纳入标准(16项中有14项被评为极低质量)。与非选择性非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)相比,塞来昔布与胃十二指肠溃疡风险较低始终相关,一些研究还报告,与非选择性NSAIDs相比,塞来昔布的胃肠道不适和严重事件更少。心血管安全性结果总体上与非选择性NSAIDs相似,尽管一项荟萃分析显示塞来昔布的心血管死亡率风险较低。与安慰剂或非选择性NSAIDs相比,塞来昔布不会增加肾功能不全或肌酐升高的风险,并且可能与较少的肾脏不良事件相关。全因死亡率的证据有限且不一致,但一项研究表明其风险低于非选择性NSAIDs。

结论

与非选择性NSAIDs相比,塞来昔布似乎具有更好的胃肠道安全性。尽管关于心血管、肾脏和死亡率结果的数据表明可能存在优势,但证据仍然有限且确定性较低。此外,一些真实世界的证据引发了对特定高危人群的担忧。未来的研究应整合来自随机试验和观察性研究的数据,以更好地为长期安全性评估提供信息并指导个体化治疗决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验