Suppr超能文献

[热技术用于血管外肺水定量测量的评估]

[Evaluation of the thermal technic for the quantitative measurement of extravascular lung water].

作者信息

Zadrobilek E, Schindler I, Jantsch H, Gilly H, Mauritz W, Draxler V, Sporn P, Steinbereithner K

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 1985 Nov;34(11):582-7.

PMID:4091246
Abstract

To evaluate the accuracy of the method, sequential measurements (n = 159) of extravascular lung water (EVLW) using the thermo-dye double-indicator dilution technique were performed in 22 critically surgical ill patients. Radiographic grading of lung water content served as clinical standard. Normal mean EVLW defined radiographically without evidence of pulmonary edema was 4.8 +/- 1.1 ml/kg. Early interstitial fluid accumulation was quite accurately detected with 6.9 +/- 2.1 ml/kg EVLW (p less than 0.001 vs normal lung water content). The mean EVLW present with definitive interstitial and alveolar edema was 11.5 +/- 3.8 ml/kg and 19.1 +/- 4.5 ml/kg, respectively. Despite some objections to the method (diffusion limitation of the thermal indicator, uneven regional lung perfusion), this technique for measuring EVLW reliably assesses the degree of pulmonary edema. Even when properly performed, chest roentgenograms only confirm gross changes in the lung water content.

摘要

为评估该方法的准确性,采用热染料双指示剂稀释技术对22例外科重症患者进行了血管外肺水(EVLW)的连续测量(n = 159)。肺水含量的影像学分级作为临床标准。影像学上定义的无肺水肿证据的正常平均EVLW为4.8±1.1 ml/kg。当EVLW为6.9±2.1 ml/kg时可相当准确地检测到早期间质液积聚(与正常肺水含量相比,p<0.001)。明确的间质和肺泡水肿时的平均EVLW分别为11.5±3.8 ml/kg和19.1±4.5 ml/kg。尽管对该方法存在一些异议(热指示剂的扩散限制、肺区域灌注不均),但这种测量EVLW的技术能可靠地评估肺水肿程度。即使操作得当,胸部X线片也只能证实肺水含量的大体变化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验