• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects of the decision on abortion and related service provision among sexual and reproductive health clinics in the United States: results from a qualitative study.美国性与生殖健康诊所中堕胎决定及相关服务提供的影响:一项定性研究的结果
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025 Dec;33(1):2557074. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2025.2557074. Epub 2025 Sep 24.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.
4
Vesicoureteral Reflux膀胱输尿管反流
5
Evaluating health system barriers to sexual and reproductive health service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic in China: a mixed-methods study.评估中国新冠疫情期间性与生殖健康服务提供中的卫生系统障碍:一项混合方法研究
Reprod Health. 2025 Sep 22;22(Suppl 3):162. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02093-z.
6
Assessing the impact of the decision on abortion attitudes by abortion identity labels: a mixed-methods longitudinal study.通过堕胎身份标签评估该决定对堕胎态度的影响:一项混合方法纵向研究。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025 Dec;33(1):2518669. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2025.2518669. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
7
Mid Forehead Brow Lift额中眉提升术
8
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
9
Midwives as agents of change: a qualitative analysis of midwives' experiences with abortion care provision in Canada.助产士作为变革推动者:对加拿大助产士提供堕胎护理经历的定性分析。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025 Dec;33(1):2548657. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2025.2548657. Epub 2025 Sep 15.
10
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.

本文引用的文献

1
"I am putting my fear on them subconsciously": a qualitative study of contraceptive care in the context of abortion bans in the U.S.“我在潜意识里将恐惧投射到她们身上”:在美国堕胎禁令背景下的避孕护理定性研究
Reprod Health. 2024 Nov 24;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01908-9.
2
Providing Quality Family Planning Services in the United States: Recommendations of the U.S. Office of Population Affairs (Revised 2024).在美国提供优质计划生育服务:美国人口事务办公室的建议(2024年修订)
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Dec;67(6S):S41-S86. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.007. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
3
Abortion access barriers shared in "r/abortion" after : a qualitative analysis of a Reddit community post- decision leak in 2022.2022年Reddit社区决定后泄密事件中“/r/堕胎”板块所分享的堕胎获取障碍:一项定性分析
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2024 Dec;32(1):2426921. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2024.2426921. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
4
State Abortion Policy and Moral Distress Among Clinicians Providing Abortion After the Dobbs Decision.多布斯案裁决后,各州堕胎政策与提供堕胎服务的临床医生的道德困扰
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2426248. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26248.
5
Navigating Miscarriage Management Post-Dobbs: Health Risks and Ethical Dilemmas.
Womens Health Issues. 2024 Sep-Oct;34(5):449-454. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2024.05.004. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
6
Health-care workforce implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案对医疗保健劳动力的影响。
Lancet. 2024 Jun 22;403(10445):2747-2750. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00581-6. Epub 2024 May 22.
7
Impact of post-Dobbs abortion restrictions on maternal-fetal medicine physicians in the Southeast: a qualitative study.多布斯案后堕胎限制对东南部母胎医学医生的影响:一项定性研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Jul;6(7):101387. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101387. Epub 2024 May 19.
8
Our hands are tied: abortion bans and hesitant medicine.我们束手无策:堕胎禁令与犹豫不决的医学。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Jun;350:116912. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116912. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
9
Abortion Shield Laws.堕胎保护法。
NEJM Evid. 2023 Apr;2(4):EVIDra2200280. doi: 10.1056/EVIDra2200280. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
10
Patient Acceptability of Telehealth Medication Abortion Care in the United States, 2021‒2022: A Cohort Study.美国 2021-2022 年远程医疗药物流产护理的患者可接受性:一项队列研究。
Am J Public Health. 2024 Feb;114(2):241-250. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2023.307437. Epub 2024 Jan 18.

美国性与生殖健康诊所中堕胎决定及相关服务提供的影响:一项定性研究的结果

Effects of the decision on abortion and related service provision among sexual and reproductive health clinics in the United States: results from a qualitative study.

作者信息

Mueller Jennifer, Cech Sidney, Mulhern Octavia, VandeVusse Alicia

机构信息

Senior Research Associate, Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA.

Senior Research Assistant, Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025 Dec;33(1):2557074. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2025.2557074. Epub 2025 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1080/26410397.2025.2557074
PMID:40916874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12462416/
Abstract

Since the release of the Supreme Court decision in June 2022, researchers have been working to better understand the impact that the growing number of abortion restrictions is having on the provision of and access to abortion services in the United States (US). Less is known about the impact of abortion restrictions on the provision of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services more broadly, including at clinics that do not directly offer abortion. Between November 2023 and February 2024, we conducted interviews with SRH managers, clinic managers, and other administrators at publicly funded SRH clinics around the US to generate evidence on the effects of state-level abortion restrictions on the provision of abortion and related services, such as pregnancy options counselling and abortion referrals, at facilities providing contraceptive services. Through content analysis, we found that, while clinics in states with abortion restrictions have stopped providing abortions or are struggling to provide abortions amidst the variety of restrictive policies, clinics in states without these restrictions are also facing difficulties, specifically having to adjust their care provision due to the increase in patients seeking abortion. Simultaneously, the complicated web of abortion regulations has led providers in all states to experience challenges related to combating misinformation and protecting reproductive autonomy. These findings demonstrate the ways in which the ripple effects of extend well beyond abortion and affect the wider network of publicly funded SRH care.

摘要

自2022年6月最高法院做出裁决以来,研究人员一直在努力更好地了解越来越多的堕胎限制措施对美国堕胎服务的提供和获取产生的影响。关于堕胎限制对更广泛的性与生殖健康(SRH)服务提供的影响,包括在不直接提供堕胎服务的诊所,人们了解得较少。在2023年11月至2024年2月期间,我们采访了美国各地由公共资金资助的性与生殖健康诊所的SRH管理人员、诊所经理和其他行政人员,以获取关于州级堕胎限制对提供堕胎及相关服务(如怀孕选择咨询和堕胎转诊)在提供避孕服务的机构所产生影响的证据。通过内容分析,我们发现,虽然有堕胎限制的州的诊所已经停止提供堕胎服务,或者在各种限制政策下难以提供堕胎服务,但没有这些限制的州的诊所也面临困难,特别是由于寻求堕胎的患者增加而不得不调整其护理服务。同时,复杂的堕胎法规网络导致所有州的提供者在应对错误信息和保护生殖自主权方面都面临挑战。这些发现表明,堕胎限制的连锁反应远远超出堕胎本身,并影响到更广泛由公共资金资助的性与生殖健康护理网络。