• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国医疗保健领域生成式人工智能的伦理与法律治理

Ethical and Legal Governance of Generative AI in Chinese Healthcare.

作者信息

Jia Jinrun, Zhao Shiqiao

机构信息

School of Law, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Sep 1;18:5405-5419. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S541271. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S541271
PMID:40917542
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12412760/
Abstract

The application of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technology in the healthcare sector can significantly enhance the efficiency of China's healthcare services. However, risks persist in terms of accuracy, transparency, data privacy, ethics, and bias. These risks are manifested in three key areas: first, the potential erosion of human agency; second, issues of fairness and justice; and third, questions of liability and responsibility. This study reviews and analyzes the legal and regulatory frameworks established in China for the application of generative AI in healthcare, as well as relevant academic literature. Our research findings indicate that while China is actively constructing an ethical and legal governance framework in this field, the regulatory system remains inadequate and faces numerous challenges. These challenges include lagging regulatory rules; an unclear legal status of AI in laws such as the Civil Code; immature standards and regulatory schemes for medical AI training data; and the lack of a coordinated regulatory mechanism among different government departments. In response, this study attempts to establish a governance framework for generative AI in the medical field in China from both legal and ethical perspectives, yielding relevant research findings. Given the latest developments in generative AI in China, it is necessary to address the challenges of its application in the medical field from both ethical and legal perspectives. This includes enhancing algorithm transparency, standardizing medical data management, and promoting AI legislation. As AI technology continues to evolve, more diverse technical models will emerge in the future. This study also proposes that to address potential risks associated with medical AI, efforts should be made to establish a global AI ethics review committee to promote the formation of internationally unified ethical and legal review mechanisms.

摘要

生成式人工智能(AI)技术在医疗保健领域的应用能够显著提高中国医疗服务的效率。然而,在准确性、透明度、数据隐私、伦理和偏差方面,风险依然存在。这些风险体现在三个关键领域:其一,人类自主性可能受到侵蚀;其二,公平与正义问题;其三,责任归属问题。本研究回顾并分析了中国针对生成式AI在医疗保健领域应用所建立的法律法规框架以及相关学术文献。我们的研究结果表明,尽管中国正在积极构建该领域的伦理和法律治理框架,但监管体系仍不完善,面临诸多挑战。这些挑战包括监管规则滞后;在《民法典》等法律中AI的法律地位不明确;医疗AI训练数据的标准和监管方案不成熟;以及不同政府部门之间缺乏协调的监管机制。对此,本研究试图从法律和伦理两个角度为中国医疗领域的生成式AI建立一个治理框架,并得出相关研究结果。鉴于中国生成式AI的最新发展情况,有必要从伦理和法律两个角度应对其在医疗领域应用所带来的挑战。这包括提高算法透明度、规范医疗数据管理以及推动AI立法。随着AI技术不断发展,未来将会出现更多样化的技术模型。本研究还提议,为应对与医疗AI相关的潜在风险,应努力建立一个全球AI伦理审查委员会,以促进形成国际统一的伦理和法律审查机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01d/12412760/0c6af756f9a9/JMDH-18-5405-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01d/12412760/0c6af756f9a9/JMDH-18-5405-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01d/12412760/0c6af756f9a9/JMDH-18-5405-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Ethical and Legal Governance of Generative AI in Chinese Healthcare.中国医疗保健领域生成式人工智能的伦理与法律治理
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Sep 1;18:5405-5419. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S541271. eCollection 2025.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
AI in Medical Questionnaires: Innovations, Diagnosis, and Implications.医学问卷中的人工智能:创新、诊断及影响
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 23;27:e72398. doi: 10.2196/72398.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
High-reward, high-risk technologies? An ethical and legal account of AI development in healthcare.高回报、高风险技术?医疗保健领域人工智能开发的伦理与法律剖析
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jan 15;26(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01158-1.
6
Generative AI/LLMs for Plain Language Medical Information for Patients, Caregivers and General Public: Opportunities, Risks and Ethics.用于为患者、护理人员和普通公众提供通俗易懂的医学信息的生成式人工智能/大型语言模型:机遇、风险与伦理
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Jul 31;19:2227-2249. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S527922. eCollection 2025.
7
Ethics, Bias, and Governance in Artificial Intelligence for Hepatology: Toward Building a Safe and Fair Future.肝病学人工智能中的伦理、偏见与治理:迈向构建安全公正的未来
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2025 Nov-Dec;15(6):102628. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2025.102628. Epub 2025 Jun 21.
8
Multi-stakeholder preferences for the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review and thematic analysis.多利益相关方对人工智能在医疗保健中的应用的偏好:系统评价和主题分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Dec;338:116357. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116357. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
9
Stench of Errors or the Shine of Potential: The Challenge of (Ir)Responsible Use of ChatGPT in Speech-Language Pathology.错误的恶臭还是潜力的光辉:言语病理学中(不)负责任地使用ChatGPT的挑战。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70088. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70088.
10
From black box to clarity: Strategies for effective AI informed consent in healthcare.从黑箱到明晰:医疗保健中有效人工智能知情同意的策略。
Artif Intell Med. 2025 May 24;167:103169. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2025.103169.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the performance of ChatGPT in medical ethical decision-making: a comparative study with USMLE-based scenarios.评估ChatGPT在医学伦理决策中的表现:一项基于美国医师执照考试情景的比较研究。
J Med Ethics. 2025 Jan 25. doi: 10.1136/jme-2024-110240.
2
High-reward, high-risk technologies? An ethical and legal account of AI development in healthcare.高回报、高风险技术?医疗保健领域人工智能开发的伦理与法律剖析
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jan 15;26(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01158-1.
3
Bridging the gap in AI integration: enhancing clinician education and establishing pharmaceutical-level regulation for ethical healthcare.
弥合人工智能整合的差距:加强临床医生教育并建立符合道德的医疗保健的制药级监管。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 19;11:1514741. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1514741. eCollection 2024.
4
Human Dignity and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Basis for a Catholic Ethics on AI.医疗保健中的人类尊严与人工智能:天主教人工智能伦理的基础。
J Relig Health. 2024 Dec 27. doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02206-1.
5
Ethical implications of AI-driven clinical decision support systems on healthcare resource allocation: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perspectives.人工智能驱动的临床决策支持系统对医疗资源分配的伦理影响:一项关于医疗专业人员观点的定性研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01151-8.
6
Exploring barriers and ethical challenges to medical data sharing: perspectives from Chinese researchers.探讨医学数据共享的障碍和伦理挑战:来自中国研究人员的观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Nov 15;25(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01135-8.
7
Gaps in the Global Regulatory Frameworks for the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Healthcare Services Sector and Key Recommendations.医疗服务领域使用人工智能(AI)的全球监管框架中的差距及关键建议。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 30;12(17):1730. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171730.
8
Can large language models help solve the cost problem for the right to explanation?大语言模型能否帮助解决解释权的成本问题?
J Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 7;51(7):493-496. doi: 10.1136/jme-2023-109737.
9
Synergizing blockchain and artificial intelligence to enhance healthcare.区块链与人工智能协同,助力医疗健康。
Drug Discov Today. 2024 Sep;29(9):104111. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2024.104111. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
10
The ethics of artificial intelligence systems in healthcare and medicine: from a local to a global perspective, and back.医疗保健和医学中人工智能系统的伦理:从地方视角到全球视角,再回归地方视角。
Pflugers Arch. 2025 Apr;477(4):591-601. doi: 10.1007/s00424-024-02984-3. Epub 2024 Jul 6.