• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能驱动的临床决策支持系统对医疗资源分配的伦理影响:一项关于医疗专业人员观点的定性研究

Ethical implications of AI-driven clinical decision support systems on healthcare resource allocation: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perspectives.

作者信息

Elgin Cansu Yüksel, Elgin Ceyhun

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.

Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01151-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12910-024-01151-8
PMID:39707327
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11662436/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence-driven Clinical Decision Support Systems (AI-CDSS) are increasingly being integrated into healthcare for various purposes, including resource allocation. While these systems promise improved efficiency and decision-making, they also raise significant ethical concerns. This study aims to explore healthcare professionals' perspectives on the ethical implications of using AI-CDSS for healthcare resource allocation.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 23 healthcare professionals, including physicians, nurses, administrators, and medical ethicists in Turkey. Interviews focused on participants' views regarding the use of AI-CDSS in resource allocation, potential ethical challenges, and recommendations for responsible implementation. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Participant responses are clustered around five pre-determined thematic areas: (1) balancing efficiency and equity in resource allocation, (2) the importance of transparency and explicability in AI-CDSS, (3) shifting roles and responsibilities in clinical decision-making, (4) ethical considerations in data usage and algorithm development, and (5) balancing cost-effectiveness and patient-centered care. Participants acknowledged the potential of AI-CDSS to optimize resource allocation but expressed concerns about exacerbating healthcare disparities, the need for interpretable AI models, changing professional roles, data privacy, and maintaining individualized care.

CONCLUSIONS

The integration of AI-CDSS into healthcare resource allocation presents both opportunities and significant ethical challenges. Our findings underscore the need for robust ethical frameworks, enhanced AI literacy among healthcare professionals, interdisciplinary collaboration, and rigorous monitoring and evaluation processes. Addressing these challenges proactively is crucial for harnessing the potential of AI-CDSS while preserving the fundamental values of equity, transparency, and patient-centered care in healthcare delivery.

摘要

背景

人工智能驱动的临床决策支持系统(AI-CDSS)正越来越多地出于各种目的被整合到医疗保健中,包括资源分配。虽然这些系统有望提高效率和改善决策,但它们也引发了重大的伦理问题。本研究旨在探讨医疗保健专业人员对使用AI-CDSS进行医疗资源分配的伦理影响的看法。

方法

我们对23名医疗保健专业人员进行了半结构化定性访谈,其中包括土耳其的医生、护士、管理人员和医学伦理学家。访谈聚焦于参与者对在资源分配中使用AI-CDSS的看法、潜在的伦理挑战以及负责任实施的建议。使用主题分析法对数据进行了分析。

结果

参与者的回答集中在五个预先确定的主题领域:(1)在资源分配中平衡效率与公平;(2)AI-CDSS中透明度和可解释性的重要性;(3)临床决策中角色和责任的转变;(4)数据使用和算法开发中的伦理考量;(5)平衡成本效益与以患者为中心的护理。参与者认可AI-CDSS在优化资源分配方面的潜力,但对加剧医疗保健差距、对可解释的人工智能模型的需求、职业角色的变化、数据隐私以及维持个性化护理表示担忧。

结论

将AI-CDSS整合到医疗资源分配中既带来了机遇,也带来了重大的伦理挑战。我们的研究结果强调了需要强大的伦理框架、提高医疗保健专业人员的人工智能素养、跨学科合作以及严格的监测和评估过程。积极应对这些挑战对于发挥AI-CDSS的潜力,同时在医疗服务中维护公平、透明和以患者为中心的护理等基本价值观至关重要。

相似文献

1
Ethical implications of AI-driven clinical decision support systems on healthcare resource allocation: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perspectives.人工智能驱动的临床决策支持系统对医疗资源分配的伦理影响:一项关于医疗专业人员观点的定性研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01151-8.
2
Expectations and Requirements of Surgical Staff for an AI-Supported Clinical Decision Support System for Older Patients: Qualitative Study.外科医护人员对用于老年患者的人工智能支持临床决策支持系统的期望与要求:定性研究
JMIR Aging. 2024 Dec 17;7:e57899. doi: 10.2196/57899.
3
Perspectives of Health Care Professionals on the Use of AI to Support Clinical Decision-Making in the Management of Multiple Long-Term Conditions: Interview Study.医疗保健专业人员对使用人工智能支持多种慢性病管理中临床决策的看法:访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 4;27:e71980. doi: 10.2196/71980.
4
Health Care Professionals' Experience of Using AI: Systematic Review With Narrative Synthesis.医疗保健专业人员使用人工智能的体验:系统评价与叙事综合。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 30;26:e55766. doi: 10.2196/55766.
5
Improving AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems and Their Integration Into Care From the Perspective of Experts: Interview Study Among Different Stakeholders.从专家视角看基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统的改进及其在医疗中的整合:不同利益相关者访谈研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jul 7;13:e69688. doi: 10.2196/69688.
6
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
7
Designing Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS)-A User-Centered Lens of the Design Characteristics, Challenges, and Implications: Systematic Review.设计临床决策支持系统(CDSS)——基于用户中心视角的设计特征、挑战及影响:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 20;27:e63733. doi: 10.2196/63733.
8
Exploring doctors' perspectives on precision medicine and AI in colorectal cancer: opportunities and challenges for the doctor-patient relationship.探索医生对结直肠癌精准医学和人工智能的看法:医患关系面临的机遇与挑战
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03134-0.
9
Navigating ethical considerations in the use of artificial intelligence for patient care: A systematic review.在将人工智能用于患者护理中应对伦理考量:一项系统综述。
Int Nurs Rev. 2024 Nov 15. doi: 10.1111/inr.13059.
10
The Role of AI in Nursing Education and Practice: Umbrella Review.人工智能在护理教育与实践中的作用:综合述评
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 4;27:e69881. doi: 10.2196/69881.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical and Legal Governance of Generative AI in Chinese Healthcare.中国医疗保健领域生成式人工智能的伦理与法律治理
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Sep 1;18:5405-5419. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S541271. eCollection 2025.
2
Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions for the Integration of Automation in Nursing Practice: Discursive Study.护理实践中自动化整合的机遇、挑战与未来方向:话语研究
JMIR Nurs. 2025 Aug 14;8:e72674. doi: 10.2196/72674.
3
Integrated artificial intelligence in healthcare and the patient's experience of care.医疗保健中的集成人工智能与患者的护理体验。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21879. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07581-7.
4
Navigating the integration of artificial intelligence in Nursing: Opportunities, challenges, and strategic actions.探索人工智能在护理领域的整合:机遇、挑战及战略行动。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2025 Apr 16;12(3):241-245. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2025.04.009. eCollection 2025 May.
5
Artificial Intelligence in Aesthetic Medicine: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.美容医学中的人工智能:应用、挑战与未来方向。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025 Jun;24(6):e70241. doi: 10.1111/jocd.70241.
6
Role of Artificial Intelligence and Personalized Medicine in Enhancing HIV Management and Treatment Outcomes.人工智能与个性化医疗在改善艾滋病病毒管理及治疗效果中的作用
Life (Basel). 2025 May 6;15(5):745. doi: 10.3390/life15050745.
7
Artificial intelligence-driven clinical decision support systems for early detection and precision therapy in oral cancer: a mini review.用于口腔癌早期检测和精准治疗的人工智能驱动临床决策支持系统:综述
Front Oral Health. 2025 Apr 28;6:1592428. doi: 10.3389/froh.2025.1592428. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Is thematic analysis used well in health psychology? A critical review of published research, with recommendations for quality practice and reporting.主题分析在健康心理学中应用得好吗?对已发表研究的批判性评价,以及对质量实践和报告的建议。
Health Psychol Rev. 2023 Dec;17(4):695-718. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2161594. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
2
Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead.停止为高风险决策解释黑箱机器学习模型,转而使用可解释模型。
Nat Mach Intell. 2019 May;1(5):206-215. doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x. Epub 2019 May 13.
3
Ethical Machine Learning in Healthcare.医疗保健中的伦理机器学习。
Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. 2021 Jul;4:123-144. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-092820-114757. Epub 2021 May 6.
4
Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19.新冠疫情期间稀缺医疗资源的公平分配
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2049-2055. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2005114. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
5
The Economic Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Systematic Review.人工智能在医疗保健领域的经济影响:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 20;22(2):e16866. doi: 10.2196/16866.
6
Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine.人工智能在医学中的可归因性与可解释性。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov. 2019 Jul-Aug;9(4):e1312. doi: 10.1002/widm.1312. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
7
Human factors challenges for the safe use of artificial intelligence in patient care.患者护理中安全使用人工智能的人为因素挑战。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019 Nov;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100081.
8
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations.剖析用于管理人群健康的算法中的种族偏见。
Science. 2019 Oct 25;366(6464):447-453. doi: 10.1126/science.aax2342.
9
Potential Liability for Physicians Using Artificial Intelligence.医生使用人工智能的潜在责任。
JAMA. 2019 Nov 12;322(18):1765-1766. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.15064.
10
Development and Validation of a Deep Learning System to Detect Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Using Fundus Photographs.利用眼底照片开发和验证一种深度学习系统来检测青光眼视神经病变。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec 1;137(12):1353-1360. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.3501.